[go: up one dir, main page]

IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/hay/hetboo/rae1834.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Statement of Some New Principles on the Subject of Political Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Rae, John
Abstract
No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Rae, John, 1834. "Statement of Some New Principles on the Subject of Political Economy," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number rae1834.
  • Handle: RePEc:hay:hetboo:rae1834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/rae/newprin.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gioacchino Fazio, 2009. "Bilateral monopoly: a contribution by Francesco Ferrara," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 251-265.
    2. Mitra, Tapan & Sorger, Gerhard, 2013. "On Ramseyʼs conjecture," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(5), pages 1953-1976.
    3. Michael V. White, 2015. "A peculiar archaeology: Searching for Mr Giffen's behaviour," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 26-50, February.
    4. B. Ravikumar & Raymond G. Riezman & Yuzhe Zhang, 2022. "Private Information and Optimal Infant Industry Protection," CESifo Working Paper Series 9772, CESifo.
    5. Drakopoulos, Stavros A. & Karayiannis, Anastassios, 2007. "The Paradox of Happiness: Evidence from the Late Pre-Classical and Classical Economic Thought," MPRA Paper 71657, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Mikhail Pakhnin, 2021. "Collective Choice with Heterogeneous Time Preferences," CESifo Working Paper Series 9141, CESifo.
    7. W. Parker Wheatley, 2014. "Consumption, Credit, and Institutions: Using Field Research and Theory to Consider Poverty Alleviation," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 57-96, April.
    8. Borissov, K. & Pakhnin, M., 2018. "A Division of Society into the Rich and the Poor: Some Approaches to Modeling," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 40(4), pages 32-59.
    9. Robert W. Dimand, 2005. "Economists and the Shadow of “The Other” Before 1914," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 827-850, July.
    10. Khalil, Elias L. & Aimone, Jason A. & Houser, Daniel & Wang, Siyu & Martinez, Deborah & Qian, Kun, 2021. "The aspirational income hypothesis: On the limits of the relative income hypothesis," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 229-247.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hay:hetboo:rae1834. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Dimand (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/demcmca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.