[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/seejeb/v5y2010i2p55-64n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Cooperation Pay? The Role of Social Capital among Household Plot Farmers in Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Wolz Axel

    (Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development, Central and Eastern Europe (IAMO))

  • Fritzsch Jana

    (Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development, Central and Eastern Europe (IAMO))

  • Buchenrieder Gertrud

    (Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg)

  • Nedoborovskyy Andriy

    (Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development, Central and Eastern Europe (IAMO))

Abstract
Social capital matters, not the least in determining individual welfare. It is argued that it functions similar to traditional production factors. However, there are not many empirical analyses about this issue at the farm-household level in general and in post-communist countries in particular. Whether or not social capital affects farm income is tested using micro-data from 255 household plot farmers in Ukraine. The data reflect 23 social capital indicators. These are merged in four separate index variables. The index variables reflect the theoretical dimensions of social capital, namely form, i.e. structural and cognitive, and relationship, i.e. bonding and bridging. By adopting multiple regression analysis, it can be shown that social capital in the form of bridging is indeed a significant factor for determining the level of agricultural income. However, the findings also underline the multidimensional side of social capital. Both bonding and cognitive social capital show no immediate impact on agricultural income among household plot farmers in Ukraine.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolz Axel & Fritzsch Jana & Buchenrieder Gertrud & Nedoborovskyy Andriy, 2010. "Does Cooperation Pay? The Role of Social Capital among Household Plot Farmers in Ukraine," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 5(2), pages 55-64, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:seejeb:v:5:y:2010:i:2:p:55-64:n:5
    DOI: 10.2478/v10033-010-0015-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10033-010-0015-2
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/v10033-010-0015-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nurul Atiqah Binti Mohd Suib & Norlida Hanim Mohd Salleh & Mohd Fazim Ahmad, 2023. "The economic well-being of smallholders and challenges during COVID-19 pandemic: A review," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(1), pages 35-44.
    2. Nasir Saukani & Noor Azina Ismail, 2019. "Identifying the Components of Social Capital by Categorical Principal Component Analysis (CATPCA)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 631-655, January.
    3. Westerink, Judith & Jongeneel, Roel & Polman, Nico & Prager, Katrin & Franks, Jeremy & Dupraz, Pierre & Mettepenningen, Evy, 2017. "Collaborative governance arrangements to deliver spatially coordinated agri-environmental management," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 176-192.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    empirical survey; household farming; agricultural income; social capital; Ukraine; empirical survey; household farming; agricultural income; social capital; Ukraine;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • P32 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - Collectives; Communes; Agricultural Institutions
    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:seejeb:v:5:y:2010:i:2:p:55-64:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.