[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/gfkmir/v13y2021i1p30-35n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Metrics Gone Wrong: What Managers Can Learn from the 2016 US Presidential Election

Author

Listed:
  • Kübler Raoul

    (Junior Professor of Marketing, Marketing Center Münster, Germany)

  • Pauwels Koen

    (Distinguished Professor of Marketing, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA)

Abstract
In the 2016 presidential election, the vast majority of available polls showed a comfortable lead for Hillary Clinton throughout the whole race, but in the end, she lost. Campaign managers could have known better, if they had had a closer look at other data sources and variables that – like polls – show voter engagement and preferences. In the political arena, donations, media coverage, social media followership, engagement and sentiment may similarly indicate how well a candidate is doing, and most of these variables are available for free. Validating the bigger picture with alternative data sources is not limited to politics. The latest marketing research shows that online-consumer-behavior metrics can enrich, and sometimes replace, traditional funnel metrics. Trusting a single ‘silver bullet’ metric does not just lead to surprises, it can also mislead managerial decision-making. Econometric models can help disentangle a complex web of dynamic interactions and show immediate and lagged effects of marketing or political events.

Suggested Citation

  • Kübler Raoul & Pauwels Koen, 2021. "Metrics Gone Wrong: What Managers Can Learn from the 2016 US Presidential Election," NIM Marketing Intelligence Review, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 30-35, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:30-35:n:5
    DOI: 10.2478/nimmir-2021-0005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/nimmir-2021-0005
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/nimmir-2021-0005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:30-35:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.