[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/gfkmir/v11y2019i1p30-35n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Perils of Retail Price Differentiation: Why Nobody Wins When Customers Lose

Author

Listed:
  • Reinartz Werner

    (Professor of Marketing, University of Cologne and Director of the Center for Research in Retailing (IFH), Cologne, Germany)

  • Wiegand Nico

    (Assistant Professor in Marketing, University of Cologne, Germany)

Abstract
Price differentiation is a longstanding marketing instrument in retailing. In our digital omni-channel environment its implementation may get technically easier, but also more transparent and obvious. As consumers generally consider price differentiation as unfair, systems need to be implemented cautiously and hold potential benefits for all parties. Some practices are perceived as more unfair than others. Dissimilarity of the purchase situation, control over the final price, the suspected motive of the company, and fairness of the pricing rule are decisive factors in the consumer evaluation process of price differentiation measures. To avoid detrimental effects like perceptions of unfairness or permanent damage of the relationship, companies must strike a balance between their own and consumers’ interests. The latter need to feel the advantage of price differentiation to appreciate it, especially the price-sensitive segment. However, from a company perspective, there is a profitability boundary to giving away free lunch. One way out of this dilemma is to foster self-selection into low-price offerings but preventing bargains for everyone by increasing the effort or time to get better prices. If head-on price differentiation is unavoidable, negative reactions can be attenuated by embedding pricing rules in social norms.

Suggested Citation

  • Reinartz Werner & Wiegand Nico, 2019. "The Perils of Retail Price Differentiation: Why Nobody Wins When Customers Lose," NIM Marketing Intelligence Review, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 30-35, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:30-35:n:5
    DOI: 10.2478/nimmir-2019-0005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/nimmir-2019-0005
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/nimmir-2019-0005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:30-35:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.