Author
Abstract Problem, research strategy, and findingsSea-level rise will bring ocean salts inland and salinize the drinking water sources of some coastal communities. How are municipalities, regions, and states preparing for salinization? In this study I evaluated 264 climate plans and seven state water plans from the Atlantic and Gulf coasts of the United States. Of these, 65 climate adaptation plans engaged with salinization in the context of drinking water; 21 made salinity adaptation recommendations, 6 discussed implemented monitoring or modeling, and 11 discussed implemented adaptation strategies. In state water plans, some states showed considerable salinization adaptation activity, but not all linked these actions to climate adaptation. Despite seawater intrusion and salinization being widely recognized, actions were concentrated in fewer states. Maryland, Delaware, Virginia, Florida, and Texas exhibited high degrees of engagement. Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia showed little evidence of planning for salinization in climate or state water plans. In the absence of federal or state governments leading on managing sea-level rise–driven salinization, evaluating and preparing for the challenge of salinization is likely to become the de facto responsibility of coastal water suppliers and well owners, who may not have the capacity, budget, or jurisdiction to adequately monitor and protect supplies.Takeaway for practiceLeft to individual drinking water suppliers and well owners with varying capacity for adaptation, water supply salinization driven by sea-level rise has the potential to exacerbate existing inequities in drinking water provision. Planners can contribute to adapting coastal drinking water systems by integrating monitoring and modeling into climate adaptation plans, creating partnerships that enable drinking water adaptation actions, and supporting new approaches to water funding and financing.
Suggested Citation
Allison Lassiter, 2024.
"Planning for Drinking Water Salinization in the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf Coast Regions,"
Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 90(4), pages 699-714, October.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rjpaxx:v:90:y:2024:i:4:p:699-714
DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2024.2305882
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjpaxx:v:90:y:2024:i:4:p:699-714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjpa20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.