[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v47y2013i10p1785-1789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Views on Book Reviews

Author

Listed:
  • P�ivi Oinas
  • Samuli Lepp�l�
Abstract
No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • P�ivi Oinas & Samuli Lepp�l�, 2013. "Views on Book Reviews," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(10), pages 1785-1789, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:47:y:2013:i:10:p:1785-1789
    DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2013.856530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00343404.2013.856530
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343404.2013.856530?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cristiano Antonelli, 2010. "From Population Thinking to Organization Thinking: Coalitions for Innovation," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 513-518.
    2. Martina Fromhold-Eisebith, 2013. "Textbooks and Academic Cultural Contexts," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(5), pages 826-828, May.
    3. Erik Stam, 2009. "Cluster Creation," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 319-323.
    4. Alesia Zuccala & Thed van Leeuwen, 2011. "Book reviews in humanities research evaluations," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(10), pages 1979-1991, October.
    5. Andrew Leyshon, 2013. "Why edit handbooks?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(9), pages 1613-1614, October.
    6. Rolf Bergs, 2011. "Planning across Borders in Europe: The Need for an Economic Point of View," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 141-145.
    7. Chris van Egeraat, 2012. "Competition, Competitive Advantage, and Clusters: The Ideas of Michael Porter," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(2), pages 276-277, February.
    8. Frank Van Oort, 2011. "Of Economics and Geography: Unity in Diversity?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 707-710.
    9. Alesia Zuccala & Thed van Leeuwen, 2011. "Book reviews in humanities research evaluations," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(10), pages 1979-1991, October.
    10. Roel Rutten & Frans Boekema, 2009. "Universities and Regional Development," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 771-775.
    11. Cristiano Antonelli, 2010. "The Economic Complexity of Technology and Innovation," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(6), pages 801-806.
    12. Peter Hall & Annalee Saxenian & Harald Bathelt & Johannes Glückler, 2012. "Book Views: Edited by PÄIVI OINAS," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(4), pages 559-563, April.
    13. Britta Klagge & Martina Fromhold-Eisebith & Martina Fuchs, 2010. "The Return of Depression Economics and the Crisis of 2008," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 383-385.
    14. Ron Martin, 2013. "Why Edit Books? In Defence of an Oft-Disparaged Academic Activity," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(9), pages 1611-1613, October.
    15. Susan M. Roberts & Andrew Wood, 2013. "Why write textbooks?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(9), pages 1609-1611, October.
    16. Amanda Spink & David Robins & Linda Schamber, 1998. "Use of scholarly book reviews: Implications for electronic publishing and scholarly communication," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 49(4), pages 364-374.
    17. Mark Greeven & Frieder Munk, 2010. "Remade in China: Foreign Investors and Institutional Change in China," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(8), pages 1100-1101.
    18. Richard Walker, 2013. "Why write books?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(9), pages 1607-1609, October.
    19. Martijn Burger & Bas Karreman, 2010. "Foreign Direct Investment, China and the World Economy," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(9), pages 1302-1303.
    20. Trevor Barnes, 2013. "What Regional Studies Might Have Been: Cold War American Social Science," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(3), pages 461-464, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Weishu Liu & Yishan Ding & Mengdi Gu, 2017. "Book reviews in academic journals: patterns and dynamics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(1), pages 355-364, January.
    2. Ugo Fratesi, 2017. "Classic books in regional studies: an introduction to the 50th Anniversary Book Review Collection," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(2), pages 346-347, February.
    3. Wang, Kai & Liu, Xiaojuan & Han, Yutong, 2019. "Exploring Goodreads reviews for book impact assessment," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 874-886.
    4. Yaoyu Wei & Weiwei Fan, 2018. "A study of book reviews in SCI-Expanded, SSCI, and A&HCI journals by researchers from five countries: 2006–2015," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(2), pages 637-654, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yaoyu Wei & Weiwei Fan, 2018. "A study of book reviews in SCI-Expanded, SSCI, and A&HCI journals by researchers from five countries: 2006–2015," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(2), pages 637-654, May.
    2. Daniel Torres-Salinas & Nicolás Robinson-García & Álvaro Cabezas-Clavijo & Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras, 2014. "Analyzing the citation characteristics of books: edited books, book series and publisher types in the book citation index," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 2113-2127, March.
    3. Thed Leeuwen & Rodrigo Costas & Clara Calero-Medina & Martijn Visser, 2013. "The role of editorial material in bibliometric research performance assessments," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(2), pages 817-828, May.
    4. Paul Donner, 2017. "Document type assignment accuracy in the journal citation index data of Web of Science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(1), pages 219-236, October.
    5. Kousha, Kayvan & Thelwall, Mike, 2018. "Can Microsoft Academic help to assess the citation impact of academic books?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 972-984.
    6. Ka-wai Fan, 2024. "Book Reviews in Medical History Journals," Publications, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-6, May.
    7. Elea Giménez-Toledo & Jorge Mañana-Rodríguez & Tim C. E. Engels & Peter Ingwersen & Janne Pölönen & Gunnar Sivertsen & Frederik T. Verleysen & Alesia A. Zuccala, 2016. "Taking scholarly books into account: current developments in five European countries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(2), pages 685-699, May.
    8. Juan Gorraiz & Christian Gumpenberger & Philip J. Purnell, 2014. "The power of book reviews: a simple and transparent enhancement approach for book citation indexes," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 841-852, February.
    9. Olesia Iefremova & Kamil Wais & Marcin Kozak, 2018. "Biographical articles in scientific literature: analysis of articles indexed in Web of Science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(3), pages 1695-1719, December.
    10. Daniel Torres-Salinas & Nicolás Robinson-Garcia & Juan Gorraiz, 2017. "Filling the citation gap: measuring the multidimensional impact of the academic book at institutional level with PlumX," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(3), pages 1371-1384, December.
    11. Julian Hamann & Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, 2022. "Biographical representation, from narrative to list: The evolution of curricula vitae in the humanities, 1950 to 2010," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 31(4), pages 438-451.
    12. Weishu Liu & Yishan Ding & Mengdi Gu, 2017. "Book reviews in academic journals: patterns and dynamics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(1), pages 355-364, January.
    13. Torres-Salinas, Daniel & Rodríguez-Sánchez, Rosa & Robinson-García, Nicolás & Fdez-Valdivia, J. & García, J.A., 2013. "Mapping citation patterns of book chapters in the Book Citation Index," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 412-424.
    14. Lixuan Sun & Adelina Asmawi, 2022. "Research Progress and Trend of Business English Writing Instruction in China (2002-2021): A Bibliometric Analysis," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(6), pages 241-241, September.
    15. Davide Consoli & Pier Paolo Patrucco, 2011. "Complexity and the Coordination of Technological Knowledge: The Case of Innovation Platforms," Chapters, in: Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change, chapter 8 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Pier Paolo Patrucco, 2012. "Innovative Platforms, Complexity and the Knowledge Intensive Firm," Chapters, in: Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft (ed.), Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, chapter 26, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Ugo Fratesi, 2017. "Classic books in regional studies: an introduction to the 50th Anniversary Book Review Collection," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(2), pages 346-347, February.
    18. Felzensztein, Christian & Brodt, Susan E. & Gimmon, Eli, 2014. "Do strategic marketing and social capital really matter in regional clusters? Lessons from an emerging economy of Latin America," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 498-507.
    19. Patrucco, Pier Paolo, 2013. "Innovation Platforms, Complexity and the Knowledge-Intensive Firm," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 201316, University of Turin.
    20. Schricke, Esther, 2013. "Occurrence of cluster structures in knowledge-intensive services," Working Papers "Firms and Region" R1/2013, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:47:y:2013:i:10:p:1785-1789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.