[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v50y2018i14p1536-1554.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eco-innovation and regulatory push/pull effect in the case of REACH regulation: empirical evidence based on survey data

Author

Listed:
  • N. Arfaoui
Abstract
Numerous theoretical and empirical studies provide evidence of a positive correlation between eco-innovation and environmental regulation. However, few analyses explain how environmental policies drive eco-innovation. This article studies eco-innovation-friendly mechanisms in the design of European REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization of Chemicals) regulation. The aim of REACH, which became effective in 2007, is ‘to ensure a high level of protection of human health and the environment while improving competitiveness and innovation’ which makes it appropriate and original for analysing the relationship between environmental regulation and eco-innovation. The primary contribution of this article is to provide a new theoretical and empirical perspective on eco-innovation by showing how design regulation is able to push and pull the environment innovation, based on an original survey related to REACH regulation. The econometric model shows that (1) regulatory-push mechanisms seem to be more important drivers than regulatory-pull mechanisms; (2) the process of authorization and the obligation to transmit information throughout the supply chain play an important role in ‘pushing’ eco-innovation, suggesting that policymakers should promote new ‘green knowledge’ to encourage eco-innovation; (3) extending obligations has a significantly positive effect on ‘pulling’ eco-innovation and (4) only well-designed instruments, appropriate for the techno-industrial and institutional contexts in which they are to be applied, lead to innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • N. Arfaoui, 2018. "Eco-innovation and regulatory push/pull effect in the case of REACH regulation: empirical evidence based on survey data," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(14), pages 1536-1554, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:50:y:2018:i:14:p:1536-1554
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2017.1368989
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2017.1368989
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2017.1368989?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katharina Friz, 2021. "A question of regulation or motivation? Environmental innovation activities in transition economies," Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation 2107, University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics.
    2. Samin Shaaban-Nejad & Farid Shirazi, 2022. "ICT and Environmental Sustainability: A Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-24, July.
    3. Jie Mi & Chuanpeng Yao & Xiaoyang Zhao & Fei Li, 2024. "Research on the Diffusion Mechanism of Green Technology Innovation Based on Enterprise Perception," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(5), pages 1981-2010, May.
    4. Antonella Biscione & Raul Caruso & Annunziata de Felice, 2021. "Environmental innovation in European transition countries," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(5), pages 521-535, January.
    5. Zhang, Dongyang, 2022. "Environmental regulation, green innovation, and export product quality: What is the role of greenwashing?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    6. Wenjing Ma & Mingyue Wang, 2023. "Discussion on the Relationship between Environmental Regulation and Green Technology Innovation from the Perspective of Innovation External Cooperation: Evidence from Chinese Private Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-28, November.
    7. Kai Ou & Yu Shi & Wenwen Zhou, 2024. "An Evolutionary Game Study on Green Technology Innovation of Coal Power Firms under the Dual-Regulatory System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-21, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:50:y:2018:i:14:p:1536-1554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.