[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v1y1985i2p193-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of information presentation structures on audit planning and review judgments

Author

Listed:
  • JEFIM EFRIM BORITZ
Abstract
. This study examines the effect of data structuring techniques on audit judgments by comparing responses based on information cues arranged according to a hierarchically structured template with the response to identical cues arranged in a simple list. Forty auditors, at five different levels of expertise, reviewed the audit strategy of a hypothetical senior and provided evaluations of the original plan, a revised set of plans, and reports of their difficulty in making the required judgments. The experimental task involved 16 cases, in which types of transaction processing systems (i.e., manual and computerized), and internal control cues, were manipulated in addition to the format of presenting information. Structure of information presentation appears to play a significant role in the evaluations and plans of the auditors, but is considered to contribute substantially to the difficulty of making judgments. In most cases, structure appears to contribute to uniformity of responses; but, in some instances it actually seems to exaggerate differences in auditors' judgments. Résumé. Cette étude examine l'effet des techniques de structure des données sur les jugements en vérification, en comparant les réponses basées sur une information organisée de façon hiérarchique avec les réponses basées sur la même information organisée selon la structure d'une liste simple. Quarante vérificateurs de cinq niveaux de compétence différents, ont révisé la stratégie de vérification d'une chef d'équipe hypothétique et ont présenté des évaluations du plan original, d'un ensemble de plans révisés et ont fait rapport de leur difficulté en rendant les jugements requis. L'expérience comportait 16 cas dans lesquels des types de systèmes de traitement (i.e. manuels et informatisés) et des éléments de contrôle devaient être pris en considération en plus du format de présentation de l'information. La structure de présentation de l'information semble jouer un rôle significatif dans les évaluations et les plans des vérificateurs et contribue de façon importante à la difficulté de rendre des jugements. Dans la plupart des cas, la structure de présentation de l'information semble contribuer à l'uniformité des réponses; dans certains cas cependant, elle semble exagérer les différences dans les jugements des vérificateurs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jefim Efrim Boritz, 1985. "The effect of information presentation structures on audit planning and review judgments," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(2), pages 193-218, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:1:y:1985:i:2:p:193-218
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1985.tb00376.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1985.tb00376.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1985.tb00376.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ricchiute, Dn, 1984. "An Empirical-Assessment Of The Impact Of Alternative Task Presentation Modes On Decision-Making Research In Auditing," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 341-350.
    2. Joyce, Ej, 1976. "Expert Judgment In Audit Program Planning," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14, pages 29-60.
    3. Hamilton, Re & Wright, Wf, 1982. "Internal Control Judgments And Effects Of Experience - Replications And Extensions," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 756-765.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kristian D. Allee & Matthew D. Deangelis, 2015. "The Structure of Voluntary Disclosure Narratives: Evidence from Tone Dispersion," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 241-274, May.
    2. Enis, Charles R., 1995. "Expert-novive judgments and new cue sets: Process versus outcome," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 641-662, December.
    3. Rajni Mala & Parmod Chand, 2015. "Judgment and Decision‐Making Research in Auditing and Accounting: Future Research Implications of Person, Task, and Environment Perspective," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 1-50, March.
    4. Dinuja Perera & Parmod Chand & Rajni Mala, 2020. "Confirmation bias in accounting judgments: the case for International Financial Reporting Standards for small and medium‐sized enterprises," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(4), pages 4093-4119, December.
    5. Rich, J. S. & Solomon, I. & Trotman, K. T., 1997. "The audit review process: A characterization from the persuasion perspective," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 481-505, July.
    6. Mala, Rajni & Chand, Parmod, 2014. "Impacts of Additional Guidance Provided on International Financial Reporting Standards on the Judgments of Accountants," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 263-288.
    7. Trotman, Ken T. & Bauer, Tim D. & Humphreys, Kerry A., 2015. "Group judgment and decision making in auditing: Past and future research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 56-72.
    8. E. Michael Bamber & Joseph H. Bylinski, 1987. "The effects of the planning memorandum, time pressure and individual auditor characteristics on audit managers' review time judgments," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), pages 127-143, September.
    9. Chuleeporn Changchit & Clyde W. Holsapple, 2004. "The development of an expert system for managerial evaluation of internal controls," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(2), pages 103-120, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sadok Mansour, 2007. "Modelisation Du Risque Dans Les Methodologies D'Audit : Apport Des De La Psychometrie," Post-Print halshs-00543217, HAL.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3528 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. E. Michael Bamber & Joseph H. Bylinski, 1987. "The effects of the planning memorandum, time pressure and individual auditor characteristics on audit managers' review time judgments," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), pages 127-143, September.
    4. Jean Bã‰Dard, 1991. "Expertise and Its Relation to Audit Decision Quality," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 198-222, September.
    5. Jean Bã‰Dard, 1991. "Compétence et qualité des décisions de vérification," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 223-252, September.
    6. W. Robert Knechel & William F. Messier, 1990. "Sequential auditor decision making: Information search and evidence evaluation," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(2), pages 386-406, March.
    7. Petersen, Knut & Patzke, Henning, 1986. "Individuelles Informationsverhalten als Gegenstand des "Behavioral Accounting": Eine Meta-Analyse der empirischen Forschung," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 177, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    8. Xiao, Xinning & Shailer, Greg, 2022. "Stakeholders’ perceptions of factors affecting the credibility of sustainability reports," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    9. Dezoort, F. T., 1998. "An analysis of experience effects on audit committee members' oversight judgments," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 1-21, January.
    10. Carmen B. Ríos-Figueroa & Rogelio J. Cardona, 2013. "Does Experience Affect Auditors’ Professional Judgment? Evidence From Puerto Rico," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(2), pages 13-32.
    11. Liangcheng Wang & Siying Li & Bikun Zhang & Yifan Zhang & Tao Peng, 2024. "The effect of auditor experience on stock price crash risk," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 64(1), pages 411-444, March.
    12. Peter Best, 2000. "Auditing SAP R/3 – Control Risk Assessment," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 10(22), pages 31-42, November.
    13. Shirland, Larry E. & Jesse, Richard R. & Thompson, Ronald L. & Iacovou, Charalambos L., 2003. "Determining attribute weights using mathematical programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 423-437, December.
    14. Stefano Azzali & Tatiana Mazza & Luca Fornaciari & Laura Trinchera, 2021. "Effects of Materiality Assessment on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting Maturity," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Scott D. Vandervelde, 2006. "The Importance of Account Relations when Responding to Interim Audit Testing Results," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3), pages 789-821, September.
    16. May, V., 1987. "Nonequilibrium Green's functions and kinetic equations for highly excited semiconductors," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 539-555.
    17. Dierynck, Bart & Kadous, Kathryn & Peters, Christian P. H., 2023. "Learning in the auditing profession: A framework and future directions," Other publications TiSEM eb74c8e4-bc4a-4b71-b88a-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Trotman, Ken T. & Bauer, Tim D. & Humphreys, Kerry A., 2015. "Group judgment and decision making in auditing: Past and future research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 56-72.
    19. Ning Du & Kevin Stevens, 2011. "Numeric-to-verbal translation of probability expressions in SFAS 5," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 26(3), pages 248-262, March.
    20. Solomon, Ira & Trotman, Ken T., 2003. "Experimental judgment and decision research in auditing: the first 25 years of AOS," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 395-412, May.
    21. Yongliang Wu & Zihui Li & Min Zhang & Shengbao Zhai, 2023. "Auditor Assignments and Audit Quality," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(2), pages 160-187, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:1:y:1985:i:2:p:193-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.