[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v22y2001i4-5p281-298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate investment and strategic stability in hypercompetition

Author

Listed:
  • Roch Parayre

    (Huntsman Center for Global Competition and Innovation, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, and Decision Strategies International, USA)

  • Dileep Hurry

    (OneSource Information Services, Inc., Concord, MA, USA)

Abstract
As competition accelerates, so do the strategies of players, in the shape of fast-track corporate investment strategies to maneuver around competitors. Under hypercompetition, a corporate strategy for acquiring competitive options may form an evolutionarily stable meta-strategy capable of sustaining persistent disruptive actions. This type of strategy is evolutionarily stable under competition across generations of contests. This paper explains the concept of memetic evolution and applies evolutionary game theory to the study of hypercompetition. We show how this option meta-strategy has superior long-term dynamic stability compared to large acquisitions and small greenfield investments. We demonstrate the disruptive potential of this meta-strategy under hypercompetition, through a simulation analysis of competing strategies in hypercompetitive markets. The concept of evolutionarily stable strategies implies that hypercompetition may indeed be an enduring phenomenon. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Roch Parayre & Dileep Hurry, 2001. "Corporate investment and strategic stability in hypercompetition," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(4-5), pages 281-298.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:22:y:2001:i:4-5:p:281-298
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.1021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/mde.1021
    File Function: Link to full text; subscription required
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.1021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul J. H. Schoemaker, 1990. "Strategy, Complexity, and Economic Rent," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(10), pages 1178-1192, October.
    2. Mailath, George J., 1992. "Introduction: Symposium on evolutionary game theory," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 259-277, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. ZHOU, Chaohong & VAN WITTELOOSTUIJN, Arjen, 2009. "Evolutionary game theory and organizational ecology: The case of resource-partitioning theory," Working Papers 2009002, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    2. ZHOU, Chaohong & VAN WITTELOOSTUIJN, Arjen, 2009. "Evolutionary game theory and organizational ecology: The case of resource-partitioning theory," ACED Working Papers 2009001, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seog S. Hun, 2006. "Limited Competition, Information Asymmetry, and Organizational Forms," Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Ball, Richard, 2017. "Violations of monotonicity in evolutionary models with sample-based beliefs," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 100-104.
    3. Mauricio G. Villena & Marcelo J. Villena, 2004. "Evolutionary Game Theory and Thorstein Veblen’s Evolutionary Economics: Is EGT Veblenian?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 585-610, September.
    4. Iman Seoudi & Matthias Huehn & Bo Carlsson, 2008. "Penrose Revisited: A Re-Appraisal of the Resource Perspective," Working Papers 14, The German University in Cairo, Faculty of Management Technology.
    5. Wang, Chun-Ju & Wu, Lei-Yu, 2012. "Team member commitments and start-up competitiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 708-715.
    6. Christina Fang & Jeho Lee & Melissa A. Schilling, 2010. "Balancing Exploration and Exploitation Through Structural Design: The Isolation of Subgroups and Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 625-642, June.
    7. Richard PEK & Marcel RIEDL & Vilém JARSKÝ, 2017. "Innovative approaches in forest management - the application of a business model to designing a small-scale forestry strategy," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(9), pages 393-400.
    8. Kazeminia, Ali, 2021. "Unfolding the airbus’ strategic growth: A successful case," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(1).
    9. Hardcopf, Rick & Gonçalves, Paulo & Linderman, Kevin & Bendoly, Elliot, 2017. "Short-term bias and strategic misalignment in operational solutions: Perceptions, tendencies, and traps," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(3), pages 1004-1021.
    10. Anne-Gaëlle Lefeuvre & Maurice Baslé, 1997. "Coordination of agents through Learning and Evolutionary Processes : a Game Theory Approach," Post-Print hal-02082849, HAL.
    11. Timsit, Jean-Philippe & Castiaux, Annick & Truong, Yann & Athaide, Gerard A. & Klink, Richard R., 2015. "The effect of market-pull vs. resource-push orientation on performance when entering new markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(9), pages 2005-2014.
    12. Manfred J. Holler & Bengt-Arne Wickström, 1998. "The Scandal Matrix: The Use of Scandals in the Progress of Society," CESifo Working Paper Series 159, CESifo.
    13. Rhisiart, Martin & Störmer, Eckhard & Daheim, Cornelia, 2017. "From foresight to impact? The 2030 Future of Work scenarios," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 203-213.
    14. Michael J. Lenox & Scott F. Rockart & Arie Y. Lewin, 2006. "Interdependency, Competition, and the Distribution of Firm and Industry Profits," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 757-772, May.
    15. Jonathan E. Alevy & Craig E. Landry & John A. List, 2015. "Field Experiments On The Anchoring Of Economic Valuations," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 53(3), pages 1522-1538, July.
    16. Lagunoff, Roger, 1997. "On the dynamic selection of mechanisms for provision of public projects," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 21(10), pages 1699-1725, August.
    17. Friedman, D., 1992. "Economically applicable evolutionary games," Discussion Paper 1992-26, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    18. Vankatesh Bala & Ngo Van Long, 2004. "International Trade and Cultural Diversity: A Model of Preference Selection," CESifo Working Paper Series 1242, CESifo.
    19. Gwendolyn K. Lee & Mishari A. Alnahedh, 2016. "Industries’ Potential for Interdependency and Profitability: A Panel of 135 Industries, 1988–1996," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(4), pages 285-308, December.
    20. Simons, Dirk & Weißenberger, Barbara E., 2007. "Die Konvergenz von externem und internem Rechnungswesen : kritische Faktoren für die Entwicklung einer partiell integrierten Rechnungslegung aus theoretischer Sicht," Papers 07-67, Sonderforschungsbreich 504.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:22:y:2001:i:4-5:p:281-298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.