[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/spppps/0258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

I Wrocławski Panel Obywatelski jako przykład zastosowania praktyki deliberacyjnej

Author

Listed:
  • Ufel, Wojciech

    (Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Instytut Politologii; Uniwersytet SWPS, Wydział Nauk Humanistycznych w Warszawie)

Abstract
W artykule zaprezentowano wnioski z obserwacji I Wrocławskiego Panelu Obywatelskiego, przeprowadzonego w 2020 r. W opracowaniu omówiono współczesną literaturę na temat deliberacji. Następnie przypadek ten poddano analizie empirycznej bazującej na obserwacji jawnej nieuczestniczącej, analizie dokumentów oraz wywiadach z uczestniczkami i uczestnikami. Przeprowadzone badanie wykazało mocne i słabe strony Panelu, co prowadzi do wniosków, że chociaż jest to obiecująca metoda zwiększania partycypacji obywatelskiej w procesie podejmowania decyzji, to wiąże się z licznymi wyzwaniami dotyczącymi planowania, organizacji i moderacji zarówno edukacyjnego, jak i deliberacyjnego aspektu tej procedury.

Suggested Citation

  • Ufel, Wojciech, 2022. "I Wrocławski Panel Obywatelski jako przykład zastosowania praktyki deliberacyjnej," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 9(4), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:spppps:0258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjournals.sgh.waw.pl/KSzPP/article/view/2882
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: azybal@sgh.waw.pl
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rebecca Sandover & Alice Moseley & Patrick Devine-Wright, 2021. "Contrasting Views of Citizens’ Assemblies: Stakeholder Perceptions of Public Deliberation on Climate Change," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 76-86.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna R. Davies & Vanesa Castán Broto & Stephan Hügel, 2021. "Editorial: Is There a New Climate Politics?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 1-7.
    2. Zenonas Turskis & Violeta Keršulienė, 2024. "SHARDA–ARAS: A Methodology for Prioritising Project Managers in Sustainable Development," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Stephen Elstub & Jayne Carrick & David M. Farrell & Patricia Mockler, 2021. "The Scope of Climate Assemblies: Lessons from the Climate Assembly UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Lummina G. Horlings & Christian Lamker & Emma Puerari & Ward Rauws & Gwenda van der Vaart, 2021. "Citizen Engagement in Spatial Planning, Shaping Places Together," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Kim Strandberg & Kim Backström & Janne Berg & Thomas Karv, 2021. "Democratically Sustainable Local Development? The Outcomes of Mixed Deliberation on a Municipal Merger on Participants’ Social Trust, Political Trust, and Political Efficacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Rebecca Wells & Candice Howarth & Lina I. Brand-Correa, 2021. "Are citizen juries and assemblies on climate change driving democratic climate policymaking? An exploration of two case studies in the UK," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Anatol Itten & Niek Mouter, 2022. "When Digital Mass Participation Meets Citizen Deliberation: Combining Mini- and Maxi-Publics in Climate Policy-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    panel obywatelski; partycypacja; demokracja deliberacyjna; samorząd lokalny; demokracja miejska;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation
    • R42 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Government and Private Investment Analysis; Road Maintenance; Transportation Planning
    • R53 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Public Facility Location Analysis; Public Investment and Capital Stock
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:spppps:0258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marcin Ochalski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sgwawpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.