[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/spppps/0066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nic o nas bez nas? Zaangażowanie ruchu osób z niepełnosprawnościami w monitoring wdrażania Konwencji ONZ o prawach osób niepełnosprawnych w Polsce. Studium przypadku

Author

Listed:
  • Kocejko, Magdalena

    (Kolegium Ekonomiczno-Społeczne, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie)

Abstract
Artykuł 33 ratyfikowanej w 2012 r. przez Polskę Konwencji ONZ o prawach osób niepełnosprawnych (KPON) wskazuje konieczność prowadzenia działań monitorujących jej wdrażanie przez społeczeństwo obywatelskie, w tym w szczególności organizacje zrzeszające osoby z niepełnosprawnościami. Faktyczna reprezentacja i wpływ środowiska osób z niepełnosprawnościami w myśl zasady „nic o nas bez nas” jest przedmiotem szczególnego zainteresowania Komitetu ONZ o prawach osób niepełnosprawnych, który przygotował komentarz generalny do art. 33 poświęcony tej sprawie. W artykule przeanalizowany został sposób prowadzenia monitoringu KPON w Polsce i włączenie w ten proces osób z różnymi niepełnosprawnościami w kontekście wymagań określonych przez Komitet ONZ. W Polsce monitoring KPON prowadzony jest w dużej mierze przez duże organizacje pozarządowe i grono ekspertów, co ma swoje konsekwencje. Z działań monitoringowych i rzeczniczych praktycznie wykluczone są grupy osób z niepełnosprawnościami narażonych na wielokrotne wykluczenie i dyskryminację, a więc w szczególnie trudnej sytuacji.

Suggested Citation

  • Kocejko, Magdalena, 2018. "Nic o nas bez nas? Zaangażowanie ruchu osób z niepełnosprawnościami w monitoring wdrażania Konwencji ONZ o prawach osób niepełnosprawnych w Polsce. Studium przypadku," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 5(4), pages 1-13, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:spppps:0066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjournals.sgh.waw.pl/KSzPP/article/view/1075
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: azybal@sgh.waw.pl
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Theresia Degener, 2016. "Disability in a Human Rights Context," Laws, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-24, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fleur Beaupert, 2018. "Freedom of Opinion and Expression: From the Perspective of Psychosocial Disability and Madness," Laws, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-26, January.
    2. Gabor Petri & Julie Beadle-Brown & Jill Bradshaw, 2017. "“More Honoured in the Breach than in the Observance”—Self-Advocacy and Human Rights," Laws, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Głąb, Zbigniew & Kurowski, Krzysztof, 2018. "W poszukiwaniu nowego systemu orzekania o niepełnosprawności w świetle Konwencji OZN o prawach osób niepełnosprawnych i idei niezależnego życia," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 5(4), pages 1-21, November.
    4. James Gordon Rice & Helga Baldvins Bjargardóttir & Hanna Björg Sigurjónsdóttir, 2020. "Child Protection, Disability and Obstetric Violence: Three Case Studies from Iceland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Mary Ann Jackson, 2018. "Models of Disability and Human Rights: Informing the Improvement of Built Environment Accessibility for People with Disability at Neighborhood Scale?," Laws, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Linda Steele & Kate Swaffer & Lyn Phillipson & Richard Fleming, 2019. "Questioning Segregation of People Living with Dementia in Australia: An International Human Rights Approach to Care Homes," Laws, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-26, August.
    7. Laufey Löve & Rannveig Traustadóttir & Gerard Quinn & James Rice, 2017. "The Inclusion of the Lived Experience of Disability in Policymaking," Laws, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Laufey Löve & Rannveig Traustadóttir & James Rice, 2019. "Shifting the Balance of Power: The Strategic Use of the CRPD by Disabled People’s Organizations in Securing ‘a Seat at the Table’," Laws, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Anne Revillard, 2018. "Vulnerable Rights: The Incomplete Realization of Disability Social Rights in France," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-16, June.
    10. Vera Chouinard, 2018. "Living on the Global Peripheries of Law: Disability Human Rights Law in Principle and in Practice in the Global South," Laws, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, February.
    11. Richard Lombard-Vance & Evelyn Soye & Delia Ferri & Emma McEvoy & Malcolm MacLachlan & Sari Sarlio-Siintola, 2023. "Applying the ‘Human Rights Model of Disability’ to Informed Consent: Experiences and Reflections from the SHAPES Project," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-20, January.
    12. Liasidou, Anastasia & Mavrou, Katerina, 2017. "Disability rights in Higher Education Programs: The case of medical schools and other health-related disciplines," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 143-150.
    13. Mark C. Weber, 2017. "Protection for Privacy under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities," Laws, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-12, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    osoby z niepełnosprawnościami; Konwencja o prawach osób niepełnosprawnych; monitoring; reprezentacja;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • J14 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of the Elderly; Economics of the Handicapped; Non-Labor Market Discrimination
    • P46 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - Consumer Economics; Health; Education and Training; Welfare, Income, Wealth, and Poverty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:spppps:0066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marcin Ochalski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sgwawpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.