[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/eneene/0028.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La economía y su pretensión de ciencia exacta: Un comentario respecto del ejercicio académico de la profesión

Author

Listed:
  • Vergara, Damian

    (Universidad de Chile)

Abstract
La presente nota plantea que reducir el estudio de la economía a su dimensión formal, entendida ésta como el componente matemático/estadístico subyacente, podría ser altamente perjudicial para su desarrollo académico e intelectual. Para ello, se plantean una serie de riesgos consistentes con poner un excesivo foco en dicha arista formal, para posteriormente analizar que está ocurriendo actualmente en la enseñanza misma de la economía y cómo eso se relaciona con los problemas descritos previamente. Se concluye con un llamado al pluralismo en el estudio y enseñanza de economía, dado los problemas asociados al escaso diálogo existente entre las distintas maneras de realizar investigación económica, y entre la economía y otras disciplinas, en relación a la realización de investigación rigurosa y relevante para el mundo real.

Suggested Citation

  • Vergara, Damian, 2015. "La economía y su pretensión de ciencia exacta: Un comentario respecto del ejercicio académico de la profesión," Estudios Nueva Economía, Estudios Nueva Economía, vol. 5(2), pages 17-24.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:eneene:0028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.estudiosnuevaeconomia.cl/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Vergara-D.-2015.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: l
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Candia, Jorge & Nilo, Joaquín, 2015. "La enseñanza de economía en una Universidad Jesuita: Un análisis comparativo," Estudios Nueva Economía, Estudios Nueva Economía, vol. 5(2), pages 73-80.
    2. Paul M. Romer, 2015. "Mathiness in the Theory of Economic Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(5), pages 89-93, May.
    3. Samuel Bowles, 1998. "Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and Other Economic Institutions," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 36(1), pages 75-111, March.
    4. Espinoza, Sergio & González Lepin, Camila, 2015. "La formación académica de la economía en Chile: Experiencia de la Universidad de Santiago de Chile," Estudios Nueva Economía, Estudios Nueva Economía, vol. 5(2), pages 56-63.
    5. Verónica Montecinos, 2009. "Economics: the Chilean story," Chapters, in: Veronica Montecinos & John Markoff (ed.), Economists in the Americas, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Cárdenas, Roberto, 2015. "La no-reforma curricular en Ingeniería Comercial, Universidad de Concepción," Estudios Nueva Economía, Estudios Nueva Economía, vol. 5(2), pages 64-72.
    7. North, Douglass C, 1994. "Economic Performance through Time," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(3), pages 359-368, June.
    8. Douglass C. North, 1991. "Institutions," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 97-112, Winter.
    9. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/67ft27s7u58ocangahl1jigu6p is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Guin-Po, Alejandro & Vidal, Milton, 2015. "Enseñanza de la economía en la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile: Un análisis comparativo," Estudios Nueva Economía, Estudios Nueva Economía, vol. 5(2), pages 47-55.
    11. M. Fourcade & E. Ollion & Y. Algan, 2015. "The Superiority of Economists," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 7.
    12. Geoffrey M. Hodgson, 1999. "Evolution and Institutions," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1481.
    13. Marion Fourcade & Etienne Ollion & Yann Algan, 2015. "La superioridad de los economistas," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 17(33), pages 13-43, July-Dece.
    14. López, Rodrigo & Palet, Andrée, 2015. "La UDP con nueva malla curricular, ¿Nueva economía o más de lo mismo?," Estudios Nueva Economía, Estudios Nueva Economía, vol. 5(2), pages 81-87.
    15. Ioana Negru, 2009. "Reflections on pluralism in economics," International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1/2), pages 7-21.
    16. Marion Fourcade & Etienne Ollion & Yann Algan, 2015. "The Superiority of Economists," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(1), pages 89-114, Winter.
    17. Irene Van Staveren, 2011. "Mind and matter: developing pluralist development economics," International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 120-144.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olavarría, Vicente, 2015. "Reforma curricular de Ingeniería Comercial en la U. de Chile: ¿Abrimos o no abrimos la mirada?," Estudios Nueva Economía, Estudios Nueva Economía, vol. 5(2), pages 40-46.
    2. Florentin Gloetzl & Ernest Aigner, 2015. "Pluralism in the Market of Science? A citation network analysis of economic research at universities in Vienna," Ecological Economics Papers ieep5, Institute of Ecological Economics.
    3. Javdani, Moshen & Chang, Ha-Joon, 2019. "Who Said or What Said? Estimating Ideological Bias in Views Among Economists," MPRA Paper 91958, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Dieter Bögenhold, 2020. "History of Economic Thought as an Analytic Tool: why Past Intellectual Ideas Must Be Acknowledged as Lighthouses for the Future," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 26(1), pages 73-87, February.
    5. John Hudson, 2017. "Identifying economics’ place amongst academic disciplines: a science or a social science?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 735-750, November.
    6. David Dequech, 2016. "Some Institutions (Social Norms And Conventions) Of Contemporary Mainstream Economics, Macroeconomics, And Financial Economics," Anais do XLIII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 43rd Brazilian Economics Meeting] 006, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    7. Timothy Betts & Patrice M. Buzzanell, 2022. "Enacting Economic Resilience: A Synthesis of Economic and Communication Frameworks," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Marion Fourcade, 2018. "Economics: the view from below," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, Springer;Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics, vol. 154(1), pages 1-9, December.
    9. Andrew Mearman & Sebastian Berger & Danielle Guizzo, 2016. "Curriculum reform in UK economics: a critique," Working Papers 20161611, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    10. Goddard, Jessica J. & Kallis, Giorgos & Norgaard, Richard B., 2019. "Keeping multiple antennae up: Coevolutionary foundations for methodological pluralism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Thoma, Johanna, 2018. "Book review: economics rules," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 84173, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Karl Beyer & Stephan Puehringer, 2019. "Divided we stand? Professional consensus and political conflict in academic economics," ICAE Working Papers 94, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.
    13. Alexandre Truc, 2023. "Neuroeconomics: Hype or Hope? An Answer," Post-Print hal-04719266, HAL.
    14. Jishnu Das & Quy-Toan Do, 2020. "US and them - The geography of academic research," Vox eBook Chapters, in: Sebastian Galliani & Ugo Panizza (ed.), Publishing and Measuring Success in Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 1, pages 111-114, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    15. Joshua Aizenman & Kenneth Kletzer, 2020. "Networking, citations of academic research, and premature death," Vox eBook Chapters, in: Sebastian Galliani & Ugo Panizza (ed.), Publishing and Measuring Success in Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 1, pages 51-55, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    16. Michael E. Rose, 2022. "Small world: Narrow, wide, and long replication of Goyal, van der Leij and Moraga‐Gonzélez (JPE 2006) and a comparison of EconLit and Scopus," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(4), pages 820-828, June.
    17. Ilan Noy & Shunsuke Managi, 2020. "It’s Awful, Why Did Nobody See it Coming?," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 429-430, October.
    18. Candia, Jorge & Nilo, Joaquín, 2015. "La enseñanza de economía en una Universidad Jesuita: Un análisis comparativo," Estudios Nueva Economía, Estudios Nueva Economía, vol. 5(2), pages 73-80.
    19. Stan Liebowitz, 2020. "Our uneconomic methods of measuring economic research," Vox eBook Chapters, in: Sebastian Galliani & Ugo Panizza (ed.), Publishing and Measuring Success in Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 1, pages 99-104, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    20. Angela Ambrosino & Mario Cedrini & John B. Davis, 2024. "Today’s economics: one, no one and one hundred thousand," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 59-76, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    matemáticas; ciencia; academia;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
    • B23 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Econometrics; Quantitative and Mathematical Studies
    • Y80 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Related Disciplines - - - Related Disciplines

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:eneene:0028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roberto Cárdenas Retamal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/enecocl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.