[go: up one dir, main page]

IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v31y2003i2p283-323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In the Shadow of Speenhamland: Social Policy and the Old Poor Law

Author

Listed:
  • Fred Block
  • Margaret Somers
Abstract
In 1996, the U.S. Congress passed the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunities Reconciliation Act that ended the entitlement of poor families to government assistance. The debate leading up to that transformation in welfare policy occurred in the shadow of Speenhamland—an episode in English Poor Law history. This article revisits the Speenhamland episode to unravel its tangled history. Drawing on four decades of recent scholarship, the authors show that Speenhamland policies could not have had the consequences that have been attributed to them. The article ends with an alternative narrative that seeks to explain how the Speenhamland story became so deeply entrenched.

Suggested Citation

  • Fred Block & Margaret Somers, 2003. "In the Shadow of Speenhamland: Social Policy and the Old Poor Law," Politics & Society, , vol. 31(2), pages 283-323, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:31:y:2003:i:2:p:283-323
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329203252272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329203252272
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329203252272?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jane Jenson, 2008. "Getting to Sewers and Sanitation: Doing Public Health within Nineteenth-Century Britain's Citizenship Regimes," Politics & Society, , vol. 36(4), pages 532-556, December.
    2. Martin Ravallion, 2020. "On the Origins of the Idea of Ending Poverty," NBER Working Papers 27808, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:31:y:2003:i:2:p:283-323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.