[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v28y2019i5p1321-1341..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The patent paradox in crowdfunding: an empirical analysis of Kickstarter data

Author

Listed:
  • Azzurra Meoli
  • Federico Munari
  • James Bort
Abstract
Building on signaling theory, this paper analyzes whether projects signaling patented technologies have a higher probability of funding success on a reward-based crowdfunding platform as compared with a control group of similar projects. Our analysis of a set of Kickstarter projects suggests the existence of an apparent paradox concerning the role of patents in this funding context. Despite solid evidence in entrepreneurial finance literature on the positive role of patents for accessing financing from professional investors such as venture capitals and business angels, our results from the reward-based crowdfunding context point out a negative signaling role of patents. We provide explanations to reconcile such evidence with previous relevant literature and highlight promising avenues for future research in this area.

Suggested Citation

  • Azzurra Meoli & Federico Munari & James Bort, 2019. "The patent paradox in crowdfunding: an empirical analysis of Kickstarter data," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 28(5), pages 1321-1341.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:28:y:2019:i:5:p:1321-1341.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtz004
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vazirani, Ashish & Sarkar, Subhro & Bhattacharjee, Titas & Dwivedi, Yogesh K & Jack, Sarah, 2023. "Information signals and bias in investment decisions: A meta-analytic comparison of prediction and actual performance of new ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PB).
    2. Sahaym, Arvin & (Avi) Datta, Avimanyu & Brooks, Stoney, 2021. "Crowdfunding success through social media: Going beyond entrepreneurial orientation in the context of small and medium-sized enterprises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 483-494.
    3. Cutolo, Donato & Grimaldi, Rosa, 2023. "I wasn't expecting that: How engaging with digital platforms can turn leisure passion into entrepreneurial aspirations," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital
    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation
    • G29 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:28:y:2019:i:5:p:1321-1341.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.