[go: up one dir, main page]

IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v96y2014i4p953-969..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Markets and the Value of Water: Hedonic Analysis Using Repeat Sales of Farmland

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Buck
  • Maximilian Auffhammer
  • David Sunding
Abstract
The lack of robust water markets makes it difficult to value irrigation water. Because water rights are appurtenant to land, it is possible to infer the value of water from observed differences in the market price of land. We use panel data on repeat farmland sales in California's San Joaquin Valley to estimate a hedonic regression equation with parcel fixed effects. This controls for sources of omitted variables bias and allows us to recover the value of irrigation water to landowners in our sample. We show that a more traditional cross-sectional regression results in an artificially low value of irrigation water.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Buck & Maximilian Auffhammer & David Sunding, 2014. "Land Markets and the Value of Water: Hedonic Analysis Using Repeat Sales of Farmland," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 96(4), pages 953-969.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:96:y:2014:i:4:p:953-969.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ajae/aau013
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:96:y:2014:i:4:p:953-969.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.