[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v90y2008i1p55-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Domestic Support and Border Measures for Processed Horticultural Products

Author

Listed:
  • Bradley J. Rickard
  • Daniel A. Sumner
Abstract
In horticultural markets, trade barriers often apply to the processed products whereas domestic support applies to farm-produced raw commodities. Here we assess the effects of such trade barriers and domestic support by simulating the effects of policy reform on global processing tomato markets, which are faced with modest processed product tariffs and high domestic support in the European Union (EU). Both protection and EU subsidy drive down world welfare, but we find that reducing import tariffs for tomato products would yield greater effects on markets and larger welfare impacts outside Europe than would reductions in EU domestic support. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Bradley J. Rickard & Daniel A. Sumner, 2008. "Domestic Support and Border Measures for Processed Horticultural Products," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 90(1), pages 55-68.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:90:y:2008:i:1:p:55-68
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01039.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rickard, Bradley J. & Sumner, Daniel A., 2011. "Was there policy "reform"? Evolution of EU domestic support for processed fruits and vegetables," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 438-449, June.
    2. Ahn, Byeong-il & Im, Jeong-bin, 2016. "An equilibrium displacement approach to analyzing the effects of tariff reduction on farmers' profits: The Korea-Chile FTA's effects on Korean grape producers," Economics Discussion Papers 2016-10, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    3. Sambucci, Olena & Sumner, Daniel A. & Goldstein, Robin, 2020. "Effect of taxes and costly regulations on the licensed and unlicensed cannabis markets," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304602, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Sengupta, Ushree & Roy, Saikat Sinha, 2011. "Behaviour of India’s Horticultural Exports: Does Price Competitiveness Play a Determining Role?," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 66(2), pages 1-12.
    5. Rickard, Bradley J. & Lei, Lei, 2010. "How important are sanitary and phytosanitary barriers in international markets for fresh fruit?," Working Papers 126974, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    6. Lee, Hanbin & Sexton, Richard J. & Sumner, Daniel A., 2022. "Government Restrictions on Food Available to Consumers: Economics of Regulations that Limit Farming Practices for Products Sold within Jurisdictions, with Application to California’s 2022 Pork Rules," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322438, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Bo Xiong, 2017. "The implications of US punitive tariffs on Chinese tires for rubber exports from South-East Asia," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 575-586, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:90:y:2008:i:1:p:55-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.