[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijtlid/v15y2023i1p48-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digitalisation and resilience of industry sectors: a descriptive analysis of the COVID-19 crisis in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Stefanie Kunkel
  • Simon Terhorst
  • Grischa Beier
Abstract
Digitalisation is widely believed to aid societies and economies in managing crises, for instance by facilitating remote work. However, there is limited evidence of the extent to which digitalisation has improved social and economic performance of industry in the COVID-19 crisis. This paper examines correlations between three socio-economic indicators of resilience, and digital intensity of industry sectors in Germany between 2020 and previous years. We find that sectors with higher digital intensity experienced greater stock market volatility, but also a faster recovery, in 2020. However, less digitalised sectors seem to have performed better in terms of sectoral value added and employment. Thus our descriptive analysis challenges the prevailing positive framing of the impact of digitalisation and raises the hypothesis that less digitalised sectors may carry benefits for resilience in the economy. Our analysis also emphasises the crucial role of the public sector and public funding in promoting resilience. We conclude with recommendations on how to design industrial and digital policies for green and socio-economically resilient economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefanie Kunkel & Simon Terhorst & Grischa Beier, 2023. "Digitalisation and resilience of industry sectors: a descriptive analysis of the COVID-19 crisis in Germany," International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(1), pages 48-72.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijtlid:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:48-72
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=132871
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijtlid:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:48-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=240 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.