[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijtlid/v14y2022i3p244-271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benchmarking the Nigerian private innovation incubators: analysis of the influence of firm age, firm size, and employee qualification on their innovation activities

Author

Listed:
  • Babasile D. Oladele-Emmanuel
  • Tobias Redlich
  • Jens P. Wulfsberg
Abstract
There is no doubt that innovation is integral to the development and competitiveness of nations and firms. The significance of innovation is partly due to the influence of innovation incubators (IIs). IIs are significant interfacial firms that contribute to the transfer of technologies from inventors to the commercial sector. Existing literature on the contribution of IIs in Nigeria is focused on government-funded technology-based incubators, whereas no study has investigated the impact of privately owned IIs. Since this is a novel study in the Nigerian context, we employed a mixed methods research approach. Qualitative data were gathered from private IIs (PIIs), and cross-tabulation analysis was used to test the relationships between the variables. The study reveals that firm size influences the ability of PIIs to generate funds through self-funding and their ability to generate revenue from their innovation expenditure.

Suggested Citation

  • Babasile D. Oladele-Emmanuel & Tobias Redlich & Jens P. Wulfsberg, 2022. "Benchmarking the Nigerian private innovation incubators: analysis of the influence of firm age, firm size, and employee qualification on their innovation activities," International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(3), pages 244-271.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijtlid:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:244-271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=125687
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijtlid:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:244-271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=240 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.