[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijaape/v14y2018i2-3p183-253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A review of the concept and measures of audit quality across three decades of research

Author

Listed:
  • Tânia Menezes Montenegro
  • Filomena Antunes Brás
Abstract
This study provides a comprehensive literature review of audit quality and it explores three decades of audit research (1980 to 2010). The DeFond and Zhang (2014) framework is used to present and discuss several perspectives on the concept and measures of audit quality, its inherent limitations and main strengths, adding US versus international studies comparative approach. The study is of interest to students, academic researchers, practitioners, standard setters/regulators and all those interested in understanding audit quality, from a US versus international perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Tânia Menezes Montenegro & Filomena Antunes Brás, 2018. "A review of the concept and measures of audit quality across three decades of research," International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(2/3), pages 183-253.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijaape:v:14:y:2018:i:2/3:p:183-253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=91063
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijaape:v:14:y:2018:i:2/3:p:183-253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=41 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.