[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/gbusec/v29y2023i1p107-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fraudulent financial reporting analyses using Beneish model: evidence from Malaysian public companies

Author

Listed:
  • Nurshamimi Sabli
  • Rosmini Mohd Aripin
  • Radziah Mahmud
  • Roszana Tapsir
Abstract
Increasing fraud cases are alarming, particularly during economic instability periods. In meeting the financial targets and secure financing to sustain business activities, companies may be involved in fraudulent activities. However, such unethical behaviour will adversely affect the sustainability of the business in the long run. Adopting agency theory, this study intends to explore the influence of firm characteristics and corporate governance attributes on the fraudulent financial reporting (FFR) proxied by Beneish model. Based on 754 firm-year observations from public listed companies in Bursa Malaysia from 2018 to 2020, it is found that only firm characteristics have influenced the inclination for fraudulent financial reporting activities. Apart from contributing additional knowledge to existing literature, this study is expected to provide valuable insights to the industry players in Malaysia to curb fraudulent activities through appropriate monitoring mechanisms, from both the firm characteristics and governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Nurshamimi Sabli & Rosmini Mohd Aripin & Radziah Mahmud & Roszana Tapsir, 2023. "Fraudulent financial reporting analyses using Beneish model: evidence from Malaysian public companies," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 29(1), pages 107-132.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:29:y:2023:i:1:p:107-132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=131948
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:29:y:2023:i:1:p:107-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=168 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.