[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v58y2016icp558-564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Giant reed as energy crop for Southern Italy: An economic feasibility study

Author

Listed:
  • Testa, Riccardo
  • Foderà, Mario
  • Di Trapani, Anna Maria
  • Tudisca, Salvatore
  • Sgroi, Filippo
Abstract
Among renewable sources giant reed has attracted a growing interest as energy crop especially in Southern Europe, thanks to its low agronomic input requirements. This paper aimed at evaluating the economic feasibility of introduction of giant reed plantation as energy crop in the Southern Italy. In particular, an economic and financial analysis was performed by comparing giant reed (both for woodchip and chopped forage production) with traditional crops (pluriannual and annual) that are currently cultivated in the same area, such as wine grape, melon and tomato. Results showed the highest profitability of giant reed respect to other crops with current market prices. In particular, giant reed destined to woodchip production denoted the highest annual gross margin with a value of 647.10 €ha−1, followed by giant reed for silage production (617.04 €ha−1), wine grape (477.52 €ha−1), melon (310.00 €ha−1) and tomato (280.00 €ha−1).

Suggested Citation

  • Testa, Riccardo & Foderà, Mario & Di Trapani, Anna Maria & Tudisca, Salvatore & Sgroi, Filippo, 2016. "Giant reed as energy crop for Southern Italy: An economic feasibility study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 558-564.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:58:y:2016:i:c:p:558-564
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032115015063
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.123?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fazio, Simone & Barbanti, Lorenzo, 2014. "Energy and economic assessments of bio-energy systems based on annual and perennial crops for temperate and tropical areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 233-241.
    2. Çetin, Bahattin & Vardar, Ali, 2008. "An economic analysis of energy requirements and input costs for tomato production in Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 428-433.
    3. Antonio Messineo & Roberto Volpe & Francesco Asdrubali, 2012. "Evaluation of Net Energy Obtainable from Combustion of Stabilised Olive Mill By-Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-14, May.
    4. A. E. Ades & Karl Claxton & Mark Sculpher, 2006. "Evidence synthesis, parameter correlation and probabilistic sensitivity analysis," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(4), pages 373-381, April.
    5. Karakosta, Charikleia & Flouri, Maria & Dimopoulou, Stamatia & Psarras, John, 2012. "Analysis of renewable energy progress in the western Balkan countries: Bosnia–Herzegovina and Serbia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 5166-5175.
    6. Osmani, Atif & Zhang, Jun, 2013. "Stochastic optimization of a multi-feedstock lignocellulosic-based bioethanol supply chain under multiple uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 157-172.
    7. Lamers, Patrick & Junginger, Martin & Hamelinck, Carlo & Faaij, André, 2012. "Developments in international solid biofuel trade—An analysis of volumes, policies, and market factors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3176-3199.
    8. Gasol, Carles M. & Brun, Filippo & Mosso, Angela & Rieradevall, Joan & Gabarrell, Xavier, 2010. "Economic assessment and comparison of acacia energy crop with annual traditional crops in Southern Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 592-597, January.
    9. Pantaleo, Antonio & Candelise, Chiara & Bauen, Ausilio & Shah, Nilay, 2014. "ESCO business models for biomass heating and CHP: Profitability of ESCO operations in Italy and key factors assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 237-253.
    10. Testa, Riccardo & Di Trapani, Anna Maria & Foderà, Mario & Sgroi, Filippo & Tudisca, Salvatore, 2014. "Economic evaluation of introduction of poplar as biomass crop in Italy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 775-780.
    11. Ian J. Bonner & Kara G. Cafferty & David J. Muth & Mark D. Tomer & David E. James & Sarah A. Porter & Douglas L. Karlen, 2014. "Opportunities for Energy Crop Production Based on Subfield Scale Distribution of Profitability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Sgroi, Filippo & Di Trapani, Anna Maria & Foderà, Mario & Testa, Riccardo & Tudisca, Salvatore, 2015. "Economic assessment of Eucalyptus (spp.) for biomass production as alternative crop in Southern Italy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 614-619.
    13. Tian, Wei, 2013. "A review of sensitivity analysis methods in building energy analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 411-419.
    14. Esengun, Kemal & Erdal, Gülistan & Gündüz, Orhan & Erdal, Hilmi, 2007. "An economic analysis and energy use in stake-tomato production in Tokat province of Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(11), pages 1873-1881.
    15. Sgroi, Filippo & Foderà, Mario & Trapani, Anna Maria Di & Tudisca, Salvatore & Testa, Riccardo, 2015. "Economic evaluation of biogas plant size utilizing giant reed," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 403-409.
    16. Borgonovo, E. & Peccati, L., 2004. "Sensitivity analysis in investment project evaluation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 17-25, July.
    17. Kantavichai, Rapeepan & Gallagher, Tom V. & Teeter, Larry D., 2014. "Assessing the economic feasibility of short rotation loblolly biomass plantations," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 126-131.
    18. Ferrer, Juan-Carlos & Mac Cawley, Alejandro & Maturana, Sergio & Toloza, Sergio & Vera, Jorge, 2008. "An optimization approach for scheduling wine grape harvest operations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 985-999, April.
    19. Hauk, Sebastian & Knoke, Thomas & Wittkopf, Stefan, 2014. "Economic evaluation of short rotation coppice systems for energy from biomass—A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 435-448.
    20. Koçar, Günnur & Civaş, Nilgün, 2013. "An overview of biofuels from energy crops: Current status and future prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 900-916.
    21. Messineo, Antonio & Volpe, Roberto & Marvuglia, Antonino, 2012. "Ligno-cellulosic biomass exploitation for power generation: A case study in sicily," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 613-625.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jie-fang Dong & Qiang Wang & Chun Deng & Xing-min Wang & Xiao-lei Zhang, 2016. "How to Move China toward a Green-Energy Economy: From a Sector Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Traverso L. & Mazzoli E. & Miller C. & Pulighe G. & Perelli C. & Morese M. M. & Branca G., 2021. "Cost Benefit and Risk Analysis of Low iLUC Bioenergy Production in Europe Using Monte Carlo Simulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Ioannis Gazoulis & Panagiotis Kanatas & Panayiota Papastylianou & Alexandros Tataridas & Efthymia Alexopoulou & Ilias Travlos, 2021. "Weed Management Practices to Improve Establishment of Selected Lignocellulosic Crops," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Deborah Bentivoglio & Adele Finco & Mirian Rumenos Piedade Bacchi, 2016. "Interdependencies between Biofuel, Fuel and Food Prices: The Case of the Brazilian Ethanol Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Song, Qingbin & Li, Jinhui & Duan, Huabo & Yu, Danfeng & Wang, Zhishi, 2017. "Towards to sustainable energy-efficient city: A case study of Macau," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 504-514.
    6. Attila Jámbor & Áron Török, 2019. "The Economics of Arundo donax —A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Pulighe, Giuseppe & Bonati, Guido & Colangeli, Marco & Morese, Maria Michela & Traverso, Lorenzo & Lupia, Flavio & Khawaja, Cosette & Janssen, Rainer & Fava, Francesco, 2019. "Ongoing and emerging issues for sustainable bioenergy production on marginal lands in the Mediterranean regions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 58-70.
    8. Maria Raimondo & Francesco Caracciolo & Luigi Cembalo & Gaetano Chinnici & Biagio Pecorino & Mario D’Amico, 2018. "Making Virtue Out of Necessity: Managing the Citrus Waste Supply Chain for Bioeconomy Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Rocha, Luiz Célio Souza & Aquila, Giancarlo & Rotela Junior, Paulo & Paiva, Anderson Paulo de & Pamplona, Edson de Oliveira & Balestrassi, Pedro Paulo, 2018. "A stochastic economic viability analysis of residential wind power generation in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 412-419.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sgroi, Filippo & Di Trapani, Anna Maria & Foderà, Mario & Testa, Riccardo & Tudisca, Salvatore, 2015. "Economic assessment of Eucalyptus (spp.) for biomass production as alternative crop in Southern Italy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 614-619.
    2. Testa, Riccardo & Di Trapani, Anna Maria & Foderà, Mario & Sgroi, Filippo & Tudisca, Salvatore, 2014. "Economic evaluation of introduction of poplar as biomass crop in Italy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 775-780.
    3. Ewelina Olba-Zięty & Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski & Michał Krzyżaniak, 2021. "Economic Evaluation of the Production of Perennial Crops for Energy Purposes—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Fuertes, A. & Oliveira, N. & Cañellas, I. & Sixto, H. & Rodríguez-Soalleiro, R., 2021. "An economic overview of Populus spp. in Short Rotation Coppice systems under Mediterranean conditions: An assessment tool for decision-making," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    5. Vanbeveren, Stefan P.P. & Spinelli, Raffaele & Eisenbies, Mark & Schweier, Janine & Mola-Yudego, Blas & Magagnotti, Natascia & Acuna, Mauricio & Dimitriou, Ioannis & Ceulemans, Reinhart, 2017. "Mechanised harvesting of short-rotation coppices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 90-104.
    6. Sgroi, Filippo & Foderà, Mario & Trapani, Anna Maria Di & Tudisca, Salvatore & Testa, Riccardo, 2015. "Economic evaluation of biogas plant size utilizing giant reed," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 403-409.
    7. Riccardo Squatrito & Filippo Sgroi & Salvatore Tudisca & Anna Maria Di Trapani & Riccardo Testa, 2014. "Post Feed-in Scheme Photovoltaic System Feasibility Evaluation in Italy: Sicilian Case Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Castoldi, Nicola & Bechini, Luca & Ferrante, Antonio, 2011. "Fossil energy usage for the production of baby leaves," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 86-93.
    9. Plappally, A.K. & Lienhard V, J.H., 2012. "Energy requirements for water production, treatment, end use, reclamation, and disposal," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 4818-4848.
    10. Krystyna Kurowska & Renata Marks-Bielska & Stanisław Bielski & Audrius Aleknavičius & Cezary Kowalczyk, 2020. "Geographic Information Systems and the Sustainable Development of Rural Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Mohammadi, Ali & Rafiee, Shahin & Mohtasebi, Seyed Saeid & Mousavi Avval, Seyed Hashem & Rafiee, Hamed, 2011. "Energy efficiency improvement and input cost saving in kiwifruit production using Data Envelopment Analysis approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 2573-2579.
    12. Witzel, Carl-Philipp & Finger, Robert, 2016. "Economic evaluation of Miscanthus production – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 681-696.
    13. Calliope Panoutsou & Efthymia Alexopoulou, 2020. "Costs and Profitability of Crops for Bioeconomy in the EU," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, March.
    14. Bonassa, Gabriela & Schneider, Lara Talita & Canever, Victor Bruno & Cremonez, Paulo André & Frigo, Elisandro Pires & Dieter, Jonathan & Teleken, Joel Gustavo, 2018. "Scenarios and prospects of solid biofuel use in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2365-2378.
    15. Caporale, Diana & De Lucia, Caterina, 2015. "Social acceptance of on-shore wind energy in Apulia Region (Southern Italy)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1378-1390.
    16. Roberto Volpe & Simona Messineo & Maurizio Volpe & Antonio Messineo, 2015. "Carbon Footprint of Tree Nuts Based Consumer Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-18, November.
    17. Lu, Yuehong & Wang, Shengwei & Yan, Chengchu & Shan, Kui, 2015. "Impacts of renewable energy system design inputs on the performance robustness of net zero energy buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1595-1606.
    18. Guizani, Chamseddine & Haddad, Khouloud & Jeguirim, Mejdi & Colin, Baptiste & Limousy, Lionel, 2016. "Combustion characteristics and kinetics of torrefied olive pomace," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 453-463.
    19. Maurizio Volpe & Carmelo D'Anna & Simona Messineo & Roberto Volpe & Antonio Messineo, 2014. "Sustainable Production of Bio-Combustibles from Pyrolysis of Agro-Industrial Wastes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-17, November.
    20. Stefano Verani & Giulio Sperandio & Rodolfo Picchio & Enrico Marchi & Corrado Costa, 2015. "Sustainability Assessment of a Self-Consumption Wood-Energy Chain on Small Scale for Heat Generation in Central Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-16, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:58:y:2016:i:c:p:558-564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.