[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jeborg/v204y2022icp631-642.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Humans, technology and control: An essay based on the metalanguage of economic calculation

Author

Listed:
  • Lopes, Tiago Camarinha
Abstract
The socialist economic calculation debate can work as a platform of communication between different traditions in economics to explore the dichotomy of technology-humans. Based on the metalanguage of the economic calculation as first systematized by Don Lavoie, I develop a triangular and complementary relationship between the mainstream neoclassical model, the Austrian school of economics and the Marxist Political Economy to minimize misunderstandings due to poor communication and to look for agreements that are usually disregarded. This paper draws attention to an important convergence between the antagonistic sides in the socialist economic calculation debate regarding the relationship between humans and technology and that the issue of control must be explicitly taken into account if any scientific advancement is to be made.

Suggested Citation

  • Lopes, Tiago Camarinha, 2022. "Humans, technology and control: An essay based on the metalanguage of economic calculation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 631-642.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:204:y:2022:i:c:p:631-642
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2022.10.041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268122003997
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.10.041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tiago Camarinha Lopes, 2022. "Rejoinder: Mises’s attempt to scientifically reject socialism failed," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 46(3), pages 613-617.
    2. Samuel Bowles & Jung-Kyoo Choi, 2019. "The Neolithic Agricultural Revolution and the Origins of Private Property," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(5), pages 2186-2228.
    3. Maurice Dobb, 1935. "Economic Theory and Socialist Economy: A Reply," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 144-151.
    4. Per L. Bylund & G.P. Manish, 2017. "Private Property and Economic Calculation: A Reply to Andy Denis," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 414-431, July.
    5. Salerno, Joseph T, 1993. "Mises and Hayek Dehomogenized: Review Essay," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 6(2), pages 113-146.
    6. Hoppe, Hans-Hermann, 1996. "Socialism: A Property or Knowledge Problem?," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 143-149.
    7. Wagner, Alfred, 1891. "Marshall's Principles of Economics," History of Economic Thought Articles, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, vol. 5, pages 319-338.
    8. A. P. Lerner, 1936. "A Note on Socialist Economics," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 4(1), pages 72-76.
    9. Andy Denis, 2017. "Private Property or Several Control: A Rejoinder," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 432-439, July.
    10. Alejandro Agafonow, 2012. "The Austrian Dehomogenization Debate, or the Possibility of a Hayekian Planner," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 273-287, April.
    11. A. P. Lerner, 1938. "Theory and Practice in Socialist Economics," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 71-75.
    12. A. P. Lerner, 1934. "Economic Theory and Socialist Economy," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 2(1), pages 51-61.
    13. Kevin Carson, 2014. "Economic Calculation Under Capitalist Central Planning," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Austrian Theory and Economic Organization, chapter 0, pages 57-95, Palgrave Macmillan.
    14. Oskar Lange, 1937. "On the Economic Theory of Socialism: Part Two," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 4(2), pages 123-142.
    15. Yeager, Leland B, 1996. "Salerno on Calculation, Knowledge, and Appraisement: Rejoinder," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 137-139.
    16. Jacob L. Weisdorf, 2005. "From Foraging To Farming: Explaining The Neolithic Revolution," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(4), pages 561-586, September.
    17. Boettke, Peter J., 1995. "Why are There No Austrian Socialists? Ideology, Science and the Austrian School," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(1), pages 35-56, April.
    18. Yeager, Leland B, 1997. "Calculation and Knowledge: Let's Write Finis," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 133-136.
    19. Michael R. Warner & Lijun Qiu & Michael J. Holmes & Alexander S. Mikheyev & Timothy A. Linksvayer, 2019. "Convergent eusocial evolution is based on a shared reproductive groundplan plus lineage-specific plastic genes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    20. Tiago Camarinha Lopes, 2021. "Technical or political? The socialist economic calculation debate," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 45(4), pages 787-810.
    21. Porter, Philip K & Scully, Gerald W, 1995. "Institutional Technology and Economic Growth," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 82(1-2), pages 17-36, January.
    22. Yeager, Leland B, 1994. "Mises and Hayek on Calculation and Knowledge," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 7(2), pages 93-109.
    23. Andy Denis, 2015. "Economic Calculation: Private Property or Several Control?," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 606-623, October.
    24. Ugo Pagano, 2020. "Why only humans and social insects have a division of labour," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 44(1), pages 1-16.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lambert, Karras J. & Fegley, Tate, 2023. "Economic Calculation in Light of Advances in Big Data and Artificial Intelligence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 243-250.
    2. Jael, Paul, 2015. "Socialist Calculation and Market Socialism," MPRA Paper 64255, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Jael, Paul, 2018. "Calcul socialiste et socialisme de marché [Socialist Calculation and Market Socialism]," MPRA Paper 89521, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Göcen, Serdar, 2015. "F. A. Hayek'in Bilgisizlik Teorisi Çerçevesinde Piyasa, Denge ve Planlama [Market, Equilibrium, and Planning within the Framework of F.A. Hayek's Theory of Ignorance]," MPRA Paper 66811, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Emilio Carnevali & André Pedersen Ystehede, 2023. "Is socialism back? A review of contemporary economic literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 239-270, April.
    6. Walter Block & Ivan Jankovic, 2016. "Tragedy of the Partnership: A Critique of Elinor Ostrom," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 289-318, March.
    7. Boettke, Peter J. & Candela, Rosolino A., 2023. "On the feasibility of technosocialism," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 44-54.
    8. Garrett R. Wood, 2023. "Assumed military solutions to central economic planning problems: evidence from soviet military journals," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 36(3), pages 383-401, September.
    9. Octavian-Dragomir Jora & Mihai-Vladimir Topan & Radu Cristian Musetescu & Matei-Alexandru Apavaloaei, 2015. "“Corporate Scene Investigation”: A Praxeological Attempt to Sketch the Profile of the Entrepreneur in Modern Business," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(38), pages 456-456, February.
    10. Levy, David M. & Peart, Sandra J. & Farrant, Andrew, 2005. "The spatial politics of F.A. Hayek's Road to Serfdom," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 982-999, December.
    11. Dalibor Roháč, 2013. "What Are the Lessons from Post-Communist Transitions?," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 65-77, February.
    12. Samuelson, Paul, 1995. "Some uneasiness with the Coase Theorem," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 1-7, May.
    13. Andy Denis, 2017. "Private Property or Several Control: A Rejoinder," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 432-439, July.
    14. Federico, Giovanni & Bisin, Alberto, 2021. "Merger or acquisition? An introduction to the Handbook of Historical economics," CEPR Discussion Papers 15795, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    15. Jean-Sébastien Lenfant & Jérôme Lallement, 2004. "L'équilibre général comme savoir : de Walras à nos jours," Working Papers hal-01765036, HAL.
    16. Hubert Gabrisch, 2020. "Elements, origins and future of Great Transformations: Eastern Europe and global capitalism," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 31(2), pages 172-190, June.
    17. Mario A. González-Corzo, 2018. "Principal Elements of Agricultural Reforms in Transition Economies: Implications For Cuba?," Annual Proceedings, The Association for the Study of the Cuban Economy, vol. 28.
    18. Vernon L. Smith & Sabiou M. Inoua, 2019. "Classical Economics: Lost and Found," Working Papers 19-15, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    19. Alexandre Chirat, 2020. "Démocratie de la demande versus démocratie de l’offre : Reconstruction et interprétation des analogies démocratie-marché," Working Papers 2020-10, CRESE.
    20. Anna B. Faria & John Robert Subrick, 2023. "After Shleifer, who needs Mises?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 89(3), pages 680-693, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economic calculation; History of economic thought; Methodology;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B24 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Socialist; Marxist; Scraffian
    • B25 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Austrian; Stockholm School
    • B40 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:204:y:2022:i:c:p:631-642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jebo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.