[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v23y2005i1p27-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Business Case for Corporate Sustainability:: Literature Review and Research Options

Author

Listed:
  • Salzmann, Oliver
  • Ionescu-somers, Aileen
  • Steger, Ulrich
Abstract
In the last ten years, the notion of a 'business case' for corporate sustainability has increasingly been used by the corporate sector, environmental organizations, consultancies and so on, to seek justification for sustainability strategies within organizations. In this paper, we aim to systemize and assess existing research and tools related to this increasingly popular concept. We present a review of (1) theoretical frameworks, (2) instrumental studies aiming to either prove or disprove a hypothesized causal sequence between corporate social or environmental performance and financial performance, (3) descriptive studies examining manager's actual perceptions and practices, and finally (4) tools. We identify a clearly insufficient understanding of manager's key arguments or business logic for adopting corporate sustainability strategies (how 'business cases' are built, how effective they are and what barriers they face). We attribute this primarily to lack of descriptive research in these areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Salzmann, Oliver & Ionescu-somers, Aileen & Steger, Ulrich, 2005. "The Business Case for Corporate Sustainability:: Literature Review and Research Options," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 27-36, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:23:y:2005:i:1:p:27-36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237304001409
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:23:y:2005:i:1:p:27-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.