[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i3p676-d488967.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individual vs. Community: Economic Assessment of Energy Management Systems under Different Regulatory Frameworks

Author

Listed:
  • Àlex Alonso

    (Electric Engineering Department, Escola d’Enginyeria de Barcelona Est, Polytechnic University of Catalonia, 08019 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Jordi de la Hoz

    (Electric Engineering Department, Escola d’Enginyeria de Barcelona Est, Polytechnic University of Catalonia, 08019 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Helena Martín

    (Electric Engineering Department, Escola d’Enginyeria de Barcelona Est, Polytechnic University of Catalonia, 08019 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Sergio Coronas

    (Electric Engineering Department, Escola d’Enginyeria de Barcelona Est, Polytechnic University of Catalonia, 08019 Barcelona, Spain)

  • José Matas

    (Electric Engineering Department, Escola d’Enginyeria de Barcelona Est, Polytechnic University of Catalonia, 08019 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract
In the context of the increasing popularity of self-sufficient communities around the globe, this study aims to compare the economic performance of energy management in two distinct situations: whether it is conducted individually or collectively within a community. After setting the context and completing a literature review, a research gap concerning the influence of regulatory frameworks in the economic results is identified. Therefore, this work presents this comparison under several frameworks employed to promote renewable energy, in order to provide a more realistic point of view and deliver insights in policy making. To this end, a mixed integer linear program (MILP) is developed, and the formulation of three key regulatory schemes is embedded into it: feed-in tariff, net metering, and self-consumption schemes. A what-if analysis is performed in order to take into account different combinations of rewarding parameters for each regulatory framework, as well as different profiles of consumption for the individual case. Results show that energy management within a community improves the overall average benefit of the customers up to 0.44 €/day·dwelling, for all of the studied frameworks except feed-in-tariff and some instances of type-B self-consumption, which can reduce it up to −0.87 €/day·dwelling. The conclusions determine fundamental differences between regulatory schemes and their suitability to promote collective or individual facilities, and emphasize the need to design a set of policies that take into account the habits of consumption of the individuals to foster effectively energy communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Àlex Alonso & Jordi de la Hoz & Helena Martín & Sergio Coronas & José Matas, 2021. "Individual vs. Community: Economic Assessment of Energy Management Systems under Different Regulatory Frameworks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-27, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:3:p:676-:d:488967
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/3/676/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/3/676/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van der Stelt, Sander & AlSkaif, Tarek & van Sark, Wilfried, 2018. "Techno-economic analysis of household and community energy storage for residential prosumers with smart appliances," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 266-276.
    2. Lopes, Rui Amaral & Martins, João & Aelenei, Daniel & Lima, Celson Pantoja, 2016. "A cooperative net zero energy community to improve load matching," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 1-13.
    3. Mengelkamp, Esther & Gärttner, Johannes & Rock, Kerstin & Kessler, Scott & Orsini, Lawrence & Weinhardt, Christof, 2018. "Designing microgrid energy markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 870-880.
    4. Liu, Youbo & Zuo, Kunyu & Liu, Xueqin (Amy) & Liu, Junyong & Kennedy, Jason M., 2018. "Dynamic pricing for decentralized energy trading in micro-grids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 689-699.
    5. Chen, Weidong & Zeng, Yu & Xu, Chongqing, 2019. "Energy storage subsidy estimation for microgrid: A real option game-theoretic approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 373-382.
    6. Qi, Wei & Shen, Bo & Zhang, Hongcai & Shen, Zuo-Jun Max, 2017. "Sharing demand-side energy resources - A conceptual design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 455-465.
    7. Jordi de la Hoz & Àlex Alonso & Sergio Coronas & Helena Martín & José Matas, 2020. "Impact of Different Regulatory Structures on the Management of Energy Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, June.
    8. Hanna, Ryan & Ghonima, Mohamed & Kleissl, Jan & Tynan, George & Victor, David G., 2017. "Evaluating business models for microgrids: Interactions of technology and policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 47-61.
    9. Cornélusse, Bertrand & Savelli, Iacopo & Paoletti, Simone & Giannitrapani, Antonio & Vicino, Antonio, 2019. "A community microgrid architecture with an internal local market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 547-560.
    10. Long, Chao & Wu, Jianzhong & Zhou, Yue & Jenkins, Nick, 2018. "Peer-to-peer energy sharing through a two-stage aggregated battery control in a community Microgrid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 261-276.
    11. Müller, Simon C. & Welpe, Isabell M., 2018. "Sharing electricity storage at the community level: An empirical analysis of potential business models and barriers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 492-503.
    12. Lo Prete, Chiara & Hobbs, Benjamin F., 2016. "A cooperative game theoretic analysis of incentives for microgrids in regulated electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 524-541.
    13. Roberts, Mike B. & Bruce, Anna & MacGill, Iain, 2019. "Impact of shared battery energy storage systems on photovoltaic self-consumption and electricity bills in apartment buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C), pages 78-95.
    14. Xiaofeng Liu & Shijun Wang & Jiawen Sun, 2018. "Energy Management for Community Energy Network with CHP Based on Cooperative Game," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, April.
    15. Luthander, Rasmus & Widén, Joakim & Munkhammar, Joakim & Lingfors, David, 2016. "Self-consumption enhancement and peak shaving of residential photovoltaics using storage and curtailment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 221-231.
    16. Bertrand Corn'elusse & Iacopo Savelli & Simone Paoletti & Antonio Giannitrapani & Antonio Vicino, 2018. "A Community Microgrid Architecture with an Internal Local Market," Papers 1810.09803, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2019.
    17. Barbour, Edward & Parra, David & Awwad, Zeyad & González, Marta C., 2018. "Community energy storage: A smart choice for the smart grid?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 489-497.
    18. Quoilin, Sylvain & Kavvadias, Konstantinos & Mercier, Arnaud & Pappone, Irene & Zucker, Andreas, 2016. "Quantifying self-consumption linked to solar home battery systems: Statistical analysis and economic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 58-67.
    19. Lüth, Alexandra & Zepter, Jan Martin & Crespo del Granado, Pedro & Egging, Ruud, 2018. "Local electricity market designs for peer-to-peer trading: The role of battery flexibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1233-1243.
    20. Braito, Michael & Flint, Courtney & Muhar, Andreas & Penker, Marianne & Vogel, Stefan, 2017. "Individual and collective socio-psychological patterns of photovoltaic investment under diverging policy regimes of Austria and Italy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 141-153.
    21. Koirala, Binod Prasad & Koliou, Elta & Friege, Jonas & Hakvoort, Rudi A. & Herder, Paulien M., 2016. "Energetic communities for community energy: A review of key issues and trends shaping integrated community energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 722-744.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lubov Petrichenko & Antans Sauhats & Illia Diahovchenko & Irina Segeda, 2022. "Economic Viability of Energy Communities versus Distributed Prosumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Jordi de la Hoz & Helena Martín & José Matas, 2023. "Editorial on the Special Issue Entitled “Regulatory Frameworks Addressed to Promote Renewable Energy Sources and Microgrids. Regulatory Constraints and Implications on Conception, Design and Energy Ma," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-4, June.
    3. Hamza Gribiss & Mohammad Mohsen Aghelinejad & Farouk Yalaoui, 2023. "Configuration Selection for Renewable Energy Community Using MCDM Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-23, March.
    4. Àlex Alonso-Travesset & Diederik Coppitters & Helena Martín & Jordi de la Hoz, 2023. "Economic and Regulatory Uncertainty in Renewable Energy System Design: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-30, January.
    5. Cristian Tapia & Diana Ulloa & Mayra Pacheco-Cunduri & Jorge Hernández-Ambato & Jesús Rodríguez-Flores & Victor Herrera-Perez, 2022. "Optimal Fuzzy-Based Energy Management Strategy to Maximize Self-Consumption of PV Systems in the Residential Sector in Ecuador," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-28, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schwidtal, J.M. & Piccini, P. & Troncia, M. & Chitchyan, R. & Montakhabi, M. & Francis, C. & Gorbatcheva, A. & Capper, T. & Mustafa, M.A. & Andoni, M. & Robu, V. & Bahloul, M. & Scott, I.J. & Mbavarir, 2023. "Emerging business models in local energy markets: A systematic review of peer-to-peer, community self-consumption, and transactive energy models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    2. Kang, Hyuna & Jung, Seunghoon & Kim, Hakpyeong & Hong, Juwon & Jeoung, Jaewon & Hong, Taehoon, 2023. "Multi-objective sizing and real-time scheduling of battery energy storage in energy-sharing community based on reinforcement learning," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    3. Capper, Timothy & Gorbatcheva, Anna & Mustafa, Mustafa A. & Bahloul, Mohamed & Schwidtal, Jan Marc & Chitchyan, Ruzanna & Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Montakhabi, Mehdi & Scott, Ian J. & Franci, 2022. "Peer-to-peer, community self-consumption, and transactive energy: A systematic literature review of local energy market models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    4. Wenting Zhao & Jun Lv & Xilong Yao & Juanjuan Zhao & Zhixin Jin & Yan Qiang & Zheng Che & Chunwu Wei, 2019. "Consortium Blockchain-Based Microgrid Market Transaction Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-22, October.
    5. Rodrigues, Daniel L. & Ye, Xianming & Xia, Xiaohua & Zhu, Bing, 2020. "Battery energy storage sizing optimisation for different ownership structures in a peer-to-peer energy sharing community," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    6. Antoine Boche & Clément Foucher & Luiz Fernando Lavado Villa, 2022. "Understanding Microgrid Sustainability: A Systemic and Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-29, April.
    7. Gayo-Abeleira, Miguel & Santos, Carlos & Javier Rodríguez Sánchez, Francisco & Martín, Pedro & Antonio Jiménez, José & Santiso, Enrique, 2022. "Aperiodic two-layer energy management system for community microgrids based on blockchain strategy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    8. Francesca Andreolli & Chiara D'Alpaos & Peter Kort, 2023. "Does P2P Trading Favor Investments in PV-Battery Systems?," Working Papers 2023.02, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    9. Roberts, Mike B. & Bruce, Anna & MacGill, Iain, 2019. "Impact of shared battery energy storage systems on photovoltaic self-consumption and electricity bills in apartment buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C), pages 78-95.
    10. Mustika, Alyssa Diva & Rigo-Mariani, Rémy & Debusschere, Vincent & Pachurka, Amaury, 2022. "A two-stage management strategy for the optimal operation and billing in an energy community with collective self-consumption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    11. Wanessa Guedes & Lucas Deotti & Bruno Dias & Tiago Soares & Leonardo Willer de Oliveira, 2022. "Community Energy Markets with Battery Energy Storage Systems: A General Modeling with Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-22, October.
    12. Cornélusse, Bertrand & Savelli, Iacopo & Paoletti, Simone & Giannitrapani, Antonio & Vicino, Antonio, 2019. "A community microgrid architecture with an internal local market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 547-560.
    13. Scheller, Fabian & Burkhardt, Robert & Schwarzeit, Robert & McKenna, Russell & Bruckner, Thomas, 2020. "Competition between simultaneous demand-side flexibility options: the case of community electricity storage systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    14. Zheng, Boshen & Wei, Wei & Chen, Yue & Wu, Qiuwei & Mei, Shengwei, 2022. "A peer-to-peer energy trading market embedded with residential shared energy storage units," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    15. Keck, Felix & Lenzen, Manfred, 2021. "Drivers and benefits of shared demand-side battery storage – an Australian case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    16. Tushar, Wayes & Yuen, Chau & Saha, Tapan K. & Morstyn, Thomas & Chapman, Archie C. & Alam, M. Jan E. & Hanif, Sarmad & Poor, H. Vincent, 2021. "Peer-to-peer energy systems for connected communities: A review of recent advances and emerging challenges," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    17. Hahnel, Ulf J.J. & Herberz, Mario & Pena-Bello, Alejandro & Parra, David & Brosch, Tobias, 2020. "Becoming prosumer: Revealing trading preferences and decision-making strategies in peer-to-peer energy communities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    18. Àlex Alonso-Travesset & Helena Martín & Sergio Coronas & Jordi de la Hoz, 2022. "Optimization Models under Uncertainty in Distributed Generation Systems: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-40, March.
    19. Long, Chao & Wu, Jianzhong & Zhou, Yue & Jenkins, Nick, 2018. "Peer-to-peer energy sharing through a two-stage aggregated battery control in a community Microgrid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 261-276.
    20. Fabian Scheller & Robert Burkhardt & Robert Schwarzeit & Russell McKenna & Thomas Bruckner, 2020. "Competition between simultaneous demand-side flexibility options: The case of community electricity storage systems," Papers 2011.05809, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:3:p:676-:d:488967. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.