[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/statpp/v13y2022i1p97-117n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Declining Pension Wealth of Employment for the Birth Cohorts 1935–1974 in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Mika Tatjana

    (Forschung und Entwicklung, Deutsche Rentenversicherung, Berlin, Germany)

Abstract
Social inequality in the labor market leads to similarly unequal pension entitlements. From a life-course perspective, however, there are two components of inequality in the labor market: the degree of stability of employment until retirement, as well as the amount of gross income earned in periods of employment. The following analysis focuses on working-life and income trajectories of the birth cohorts 1935–1974 in East and West Germany until age 40. The results demonstrate a structural shift in the German labor market towards less stable employment in the first half of the working career. The labor market therefore offered increasingly less stable employment, with an especially stark negative trend for East Germans. Only West German women born after 1945 experienced a positive trend in employment stability. For employees of all birth cohorts, the analysis demonstrates that instability in the employment career has a strong negative effect on income and, subsequently, on pension wealth. The impact of income discrimination against those with less employment stability thus remained similar for the later-born despite the more widespread experience of employment interruptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mika Tatjana, 2022. "The Declining Pension Wealth of Employment for the Birth Cohorts 1935–1974 in Germany," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 97-117, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:statpp:v:13:y:2022:i:1:p:97-117:n:5
    DOI: 10.1515/spp-2021-0022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/spp-2021-0022
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/spp-2021-0022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:statpp:v:13:y:2022:i:1:p:97-117:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.