[go: up one dir, main page]

IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/bejeap/v24y2024i3p701-750n1002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asymmetric Performance Evaluation Under Quantity and Price Competition with Managerial Delegation

Author

Listed:
  • Hamamura Jumpei

    (School of Business Administration, Kwansei Gakuin University, 1-155 Uegahara Ichiban-Cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 662-8501, Japan)

  • Ramani Vinay

    (Department of Industrial & Management Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, 208016, India)

Abstract
In this paper, we consider asymmetric performance evaluation contracts under different product market configurations with managerial delegation and specify the optimal decision-making by the social and relative performance evaluation firms. We present a reversal result on the owner’s choice of the social performance and relative performance evaluation contract as the product market competition type changes from quantity to price competition. Surprisingly, results indicate that the consumer surplus increases as the degree of product substitution increases under quantity competition in a specific economic environment. A firm that considers social performance evaluation produces less, charges a higher price, and earns a lower profit than a firm that uses relative performance evaluation. We also endogenize the choice of performance evaluation systems. While relative performance emerges as the endogenous choice under both modes of product market competition, it leads to lower consumer surplus and social welfare in comparison to an asymmetric performance evaluation system.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamamura Jumpei & Ramani Vinay, 2024. "Asymmetric Performance Evaluation Under Quantity and Price Competition with Managerial Delegation," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 24(3), pages 701-750.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:bejeap:v:24:y:2024:i:3:p:701-750:n:1002
    DOI: 10.1515/bejeap-2023-0135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2023-0135
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/bejeap-2023-0135?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:bejeap:v:24:y:2024:i:3:p:701-750:n:1002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.