[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v39y2022i2p143-169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What do we know about opportunities and challenges for localities from Cannabis legalization?

Author

Listed:
  • Parisa Kavousi
  • Taylor Giamo
  • Gwen Arnold
  • Mateo Alliende
  • Elisabeth Huynh
  • Jaclyn Lea
  • Rachel Lucine
  • Alexandria Tillett Miller
  • Alana Webre
  • Aneka Yee
  • Adrianna Champagne‐Zamora
  • Keith Taylor
Abstract
This review article assays the scholarly and popular press literature on the opportunities and challenges the growing legalized cannabis industry offers U.S. local governments and communities. Localities are an important focus because in many states with legalized cannabis, local jurisdictions have authority to prevent or condition its cultivation, sale, and use. Opportunities potentially flowing to localities from legalization include increased tax revenues and land values, business expansion, and increased employment; public health and safety benefits; and the potential for legalization to advance social and racial inclusion. Challenges include the possibility that economic benefits will be more limited than anticipated; complex regulatory environments facing local governments and cannabis businesses, possible increases in pollution, blight, and public health and safety concerns; and less advancement of social and racial equity than hoped by advocates. We offer recommendations for scholars investigating cannabis governance concerns and practitioners directly grappling with them. 本篇述评分析了关于“不断兴起的合法化大麻产业为美国地方政府和社区带来的机遇与挑战”的学术文献和大众刊物。地方 (Localities) 是一个重点, 因为在许多批准大麻合法化的州中, 地方管辖机构有权阻止或影响大麻的种植、销售及住用。大麻合法化可能为地方带来的机遇包括: 税收增加和土地价值增加、商业扩大、就业增加; 公共卫生和安全利益; 以及合法化在促进社会包容和种族包容方面的可能性。挑战包括: 经济利益将比预期更为受限的可能性; 地方政府和大麻产业面临的复杂监管环境、可能的污染恶化、作物疫病、公共卫生和安全关切; 以及比大麻倡导者预期更少的社会公平进步和种族公平进步。我们为研究大麻治理关切的学者和直接应对这些关切的从业人员提供一系列建议。 Este artículo de revisión analiza la literatura de prensa académica y popular sobre las oportunidades y desafíos que ofrece la creciente industria legalizada del cannabis a los gobiernos y comunidades locales de EE. UU. Las localidades son un foco importante porque en muchos estados con cannabis legalizado, las jurisdicciones locales tienen autoridad para prevenir o condicionar su cultivo, venta y uso. Las oportunidades que potencialmente fluyen a las localidades a partir de la legalización incluyen el aumento de los ingresos fiscales y el valor de la tierra, la expansión comercial y el aumento del empleo; beneficios de salud pública y seguridad; y el potencial de la legalización para promover la inclusión social y racial. Los desafíos incluyen la posibilidad de que los beneficios económicos sean más limitados de lo previsto; entornos regulatorios complejos a los que se enfrentan los gobiernos locales y las empresas de cannabis, posibles aumentos de la contaminación, las plagas y los problemas de salud y seguridad pública; y menos avance de la equidad social y racial de lo que esperaban los defensores. Ofrecemos recomendaciones para académicos que investigan las preocupaciones sobre la gobernanza del cannabis y para los profesionales que las abordan directamente.

Suggested Citation

  • Parisa Kavousi & Taylor Giamo & Gwen Arnold & Mateo Alliende & Elisabeth Huynh & Jaclyn Lea & Rachel Lucine & Alexandria Tillett Miller & Alana Webre & Aneka Yee & Adrianna Champagne‐Zamora & Keith Ta, 2022. "What do we know about opportunities and challenges for localities from Cannabis legalization?," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(2), pages 143-169, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:39:y:2022:i:2:p:143-169
    DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12460
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ropr.12460?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael J. Motta, 2021. "Diffusion and Typology: The Invention and Early Adoption of Medicinal Marijuana and Offshore Wind Policies," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(1), pages 567-584, January.
    2. Anat Gofen, 2015. "Reconciling policy dissonance: patterns of governmental response to policy noncompliance," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 48(1), pages 3-24, March.
    3. Hailey M. Summers & Evan Sproul & Jason C. Quinn, 2021. "The greenhouse gas emissions of indoor cannabis production in the United States," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(7), pages 644-650, July.
    4. Jesse Burkhardt & Chris Goemans, 2019. "The short-run effects of marijuana dispensary openings on local crime," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 63(1), pages 163-189, August.
    5. Brian Owens, 2019. "The professionalization of cannabis growing," Nature, Nature, vol. 572(7771), pages 10-11, August.
    6. Rosalie Liccardo Pacula & Eric L. Sevigny, 2014. "Marijuana Liberalization Policies: Why We Can't Learn Much from Policy Still in Motion," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 212-221, January.
    7. James Conklin & Moussa Diop & Herman Li, 2020. "Contact High: The External Effects of Retail Marijuana Establishments on House Prices," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 48(1), pages 135-173, March.
    8. Wu, Guangzhen & Wen, Ming & Wilson, Fernando A., 2021. "Impact of recreational marijuana legalization on crime: Evidence from Oregon," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    9. Jesse Burkhardt & Matthew Flyr, 2019. "The Effect Of Marijuana Dispensary Openings On Housing Prices," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 37(3), pages 462-475, July.
    10. Dillis, Christopher & Biber, Eric & Bodwitch, Hekia & Butsic, Van & Carah, Jennifer & Parker-Shames, Phoebe & Polson, Michael & Grantham, Theodore, 2021. "Shifting geographies of legal cannabis production in California," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    11. Butsic, Van & Schwab, Benjamin & Baumann, Matthias & Brenner, Jacob C., 2017. "Inside the Emerald Triangle: Modeling the Placement and Size of Cannabis Production in Humboldt County, CA USA," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 70-80.
    12. D. Mark Anderson & Benjamin Hansen & Daniel I. Rees, 2013. "Medical Marijuana Laws, Traffic Fatalities, and Alcohol Consumption," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(2), pages 333-369.
    13. Jeremy N�meth & Eric Ross, 2014. "Planning for Marijuana: The Cannabis Conundrum," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 80(1), pages 6-20, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shahida Anusha Siddiqui & Prachi Singh & Sipper Khan & Ito Fernando & Igor Spartakovich Baklanov & Tigran Garrievich Ambartsumov & Salam A. Ibrahim, 2022. "Cultural, Social and Psychological Factors of the Conservative Consumer towards Legal Cannabis Use—A Review since 2013," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scott Callahan & David M. Bruner & Chris Giguere, 2021. "Smoke and Fears: The Effects of Marijuana Prohibition on Crime," Working Papers 21-12, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.
    2. Calkins, Lindsay N. & Ryan, Alexander J. & Zlatoper, Thomas J., 2023. "The Political Economy of Recreational Marijuana Laws in the U.S.: A Spatial Approach," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 53(1), April.
    3. Dwayne Marshall Baker, 2024. "Burden or benefit: Is retail marijuana facility siting influenced by LULU- or gentrification-related neighbourhood characteristics?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(6), pages 1049-1070, May.
    4. Eric L. Sevigny & Rosalie L. Pacula & Ariel M. Aloe & Danye N. Medhin & Jared Greathouse, 2021. "PROTOCOL: The effects of cannabis liberalization laws on health, safety, and socioeconomic outcomes: An evidence and gap map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), March.
    5. Sabia, Joseph J. & Dave, Dhaval & Alotaibi, Fawaz & Rees, Daniel I., 2024. "The effects of recreational marijuana laws on drug use and crime," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    6. Keshar M. Ghimire & Johanna Catherine Maclean, 2020. "Medical marijuana and workers' compensation claiming," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 419-434, April.
    7. Polson, Michael & Bodwitch, Hekia & Biber, Eric & Butsic, Van & Grantham, Theodore, 2023. "After legalization: Cannabis, environmental compliance, and agricultural futures," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    8. Hefei Wen & Jason Hockenberry & Janet R. Cummings, 2014. "The Effect of Medical Marijuana Laws on Marijuana, Alcohol, and Hard Drug Use," NBER Working Papers 20085, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Wen, Hefei & Hockenberry, Jason M. & Cummings, Janet R., 2015. "The effect of medical marijuana laws on adolescent and adult use of marijuana, alcohol, and other substances," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 64-80.
    10. Louis‐Philippe Beland & Jason Huh & Dongwoo Kim, 2024. "The effect of opioid use on traffic fatalities," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(6), pages 1123-1132, June.
    11. Kim, Jiin & Huh, Jin & Yoo, Sung-Sang, 2023. "Implementation of reproductive health education in a Filipino city: A case study," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    12. David Jancsics & Salvador Espinosa & Jonathan Carlos, 2023. "Organizational noncompliance: an interdisciplinary review of social and organizational factors," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 1273-1301, September.
    13. Carrieri, Vincenzo & Madio, Leonardo & Principe, Francesco, 2019. "Light cannabis and organized crime: Evidence from (unintended) liberalization in Italy," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 63-76.
    14. Rinaldo Brau & Marco Nieddu & S. Balia, 2021. "Depowering Risk: Vehicle Power Restriction and Teen Driver Accidents in Italy," Working Paper CRENoS 202101, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    15. Jesse Burkhardt & Chris Goemans, 2019. "The short-run effects of marijuana dispensary openings on local crime," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 63(1), pages 163-189, August.
    16. Rahi Abouk & Keshar M. Ghimire & Johanna Catherine Maclean & David Powell, 2023. "Pain Management and Work Capacity: Evidence From Workers’ Compensation and Marijuana Legalization," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(3), pages 737-770, June.
    17. D. Mark Anderson & Benjamin Hansen & Daniel I. Rees, 2015. "Medical Marijuana Laws and Teen Marijuana Use," American Law and Economics Review, American Law and Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 495-528.
    18. Olivier Marie & Ulf Zölitz, 2017. "“High” Achievers? Cannabis Access and Academic Performance," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 84(3), pages 1210-1237.
    19. d'Este, Rocco, 2022. "Scientific Advancements in Illegal Drugs Production and Institutional Responses: New Psychoactive Substances, Self-Harm, and Violence inside Prisons," IZA Discussion Papers 15248, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    20. Jan C. Ours & Jenny Williams, 2015. "Cannabis Use And Its Effects On Health, Education And Labor Market Success," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 993-1010, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:39:y:2022:i:2:p:143-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.