[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v64y2013i12p2468-2491.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The intellectual characteristics of the information field: Heritage and substance

Author

Listed:
  • Ping Zhang
  • Jasy Liew Suet Yan
  • Katie DeVries Hassman
Abstract
As the information field (IField) becomes more recognized by different constituencies for education and research, the need to better understand its intellectual characteristics becomes more compelling. Although there are various conceptualizations of the IField, to date, in‐depth studies based on empirical evidence are scarce. This article reports a study that fills this gap. We focus on the first five ISchools in the ICaucus as a proxy to represent the IField. The intellectual characteristics are depicted by two independent sets of data on tenure track faculty as knowledge contributors: their intellectual heritages and the intellectual substance in their journal publications. We use a critical analysis method to examine doctoral training areas and 3 years of journal publications. Our results indicate that (a) the IField can be better conceptualized with empirical support by a four‐component model that includes People, Information, Technology, and Management, as predicted by the I‐Model (Zhang & Benjamin, 2007); (b) the ISchools' faculty members are diverse, interdisciplinary, and multidisciplinary as shown by their intellectual heritages, by their research foci, by journals in which they publish, by the contexts within which they conduct research, and by the levels of analysis in research investigations; (c) the five ISchools share similarities while evincing differences in both faculty heritages and intellectual substances; (d) ISchool tenure track faculty members do not collaborate much with each other within or across schools although there is great potential; and (e) intellectual heritages are not good predictors of scholars' intellectual substance. We conclude by discussing the implications of the findings on IField identity, IField development, new ISchool formation and existing ISchool evolution, faculty career development, and collaboration within the IField.

Suggested Citation

  • Ping Zhang & Jasy Liew Suet Yan & Katie DeVries Hassman, 2013. "The intellectual characteristics of the information field: Heritage and substance," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(12), pages 2468-2491, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:64:y:2013:i:12:p:2468-2491
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.22941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22941
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.22941?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shalini R. Urs & Mohamed Minhaj, 2023. "Evolution of data science and its education in iSchools: An impressionistic study using curriculum analysis," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(6), pages 606-622, June.
    2. Zuo, Zhiya & Zhao, Kang & Ni, Chaoqun, 2019. "Standing on the shoulders of giants?—Faculty hiring in information schools," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 341-353.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:64:y:2013:i:12:p:2468-2491. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.