[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v64y2013i10p2157-2172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Visualizing the history of evidence‐based medicine: A bibliometric analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jiantong Shen
  • Leye Yao
  • Youping Li
  • Mike Clarke
  • Li Wang
  • Dan Li
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to visualize the history of evidence‐based medicine (EBM) and to examine the characteristics of EBM development in China and the West. We searched the Web of Science and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure database for papers related to EBM. We applied information visualization techniques, citation analysis, cocitation analysis, cocitation cluster analysis, and network analysis to construct historiographies, themes networks, and chronological theme maps regarding EBM in China and the West. EBM appeared to develop in 4 stages: incubation (1972–1992 in the West vs. 1982–1999 in China), initiation (1992–1993 vs. 1999–2000), rapid development (1993–2000 vs. 2000–2004), and stable distribution (2000 onwards vs. 2004 onwards). Although there was a lag in EBM initiation in China compared with the West, the pace of development appeared similar. Our study shows that important differences exist in research themes, domain structures, and development depth, and in the speed of adoption between China and the West. In the West, efforts in EBM have shifted from education to practice, and from the quality of evidence to its translation. In China, there was a similar shift from education to practice, and from production of evidence to its translation. In addition, this concept has diffused to other healthcare areas, leading to the development of evidence‐based traditional Chinese medicine, evidence‐based nursing, and evidence‐based policy making.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiantong Shen & Leye Yao & Youping Li & Mike Clarke & Li Wang & Dan Li, 2013. "Visualizing the history of evidence‐based medicine: A bibliometric analysis," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(10), pages 2157-2172, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:64:y:2013:i:10:p:2157-2172
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.22890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22890
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.22890?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:64:y:2013:i:10:p:2157-2172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.