[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v75y2019i1p133-143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A useful design utilizing the information fraction in a group sequential clinical trial with censored survival data

Author

Listed:
  • Chih‐Yuan Hsu
  • Chen‐Hsin Chen
  • Ken‐Ning Hsu
  • Ya‐Hung Lu
Abstract
Lan and DeMets (1983) proposed the alpha spending function for group sequential trials to permit the use of unspecified frequencies and timings of interim analyses in the trial design. Regarding a trial with censored time to endpoint, Lan and DeMets (1989) later defined information time at an interim analysis in a maximum duration trial. To compare two survival curves utilizing such a design, information times for group sequential logrank and Wilcoxon‐type statistics have been developed by assuming that the survival time follows an exponential distribution or a Weibull distribution without considering the censoring distribution. To better address the practical concerns inherent in clinical trials with survival endpoints, we present a new approach to adequately design a group sequential trial using the Harrington–Fleming (1982) test based on our proposed information fractions by assuming the censoring distribution depends on the patient's accrual time according to various entry distributions and by extending the underlying survival distribution to the generalized gamma distribution. We also determine associated sample sizes, expected number of events and expected stopping time. Two phase III trials of non‐small‐cell lung cancer originally designed using fixed‐sample tests are utilized to illustrate the potential advantages of using a group sequential design with the proposed approach. This enhanced method facilitates the design and analysis of group sequential clinical trials studying survival endpoints by increasing implemental flexibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Chih‐Yuan Hsu & Chen‐Hsin Chen & Ken‐Ning Hsu & Ya‐Hung Lu, 2019. "A useful design utilizing the information fraction in a group sequential clinical trial with censored survival data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 133-143, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:75:y:2019:i:1:p:133-143
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.12925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12925
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.12925?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Constantine E. Frangakis & Donald B. Rubin, 2001. "Addressing an Idiosyncrasy in Estimating Survival Curves Using Double Sampling in the Presence of Self-Selected Right Censoring," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 333-342, June.
    2. Constantine E. Frangakis & Donald B. Rubin, 2001. "Rejoinder to Discussions on Addressing an Idiosyncrasy in Estimating Survival Curves Using Double Sampling in the Presence of Self-Selected Right Censoring," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 351-353, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Menggang Yu, 2016. "Improving estimation efficiency for semi-competing risks data with partially observed terminal event," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 860-874, October.
    2. Richard J. Cook & Jerald F. Lawless, 2020. "Failure time studies with intermittent observation and losses to follow‐up," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 47(4), pages 1035-1063, December.
    3. Constantine E. Frangakis & Donald B. Rubin, 2002. "Principal Stratification in Causal Inference," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(1), pages 21-29, March.
    4. Menggang Yu & Constantin T. Yiannoutsos, 2015. "Marginal and Conditional Distribution Estimation from Double-sampled Semi-competing Risks Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(1), pages 87-103, March.
    5. Stephanie A. Kovalchik & Steven C. Martino & Rebecca L. Collins & William G. Shadel & Elizabeth J. D’Amico & Kirsten Becker, 2018. "Scaled Inverse Probability Weighting: A Method to Assess Potential Bias Due to Event Nonreporting in Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 43(3), pages 354-381, June.
    6. Tianchen Qian & Constantine Frangakis & Constantin Yiannoutsos, 2020. "Deductive Semiparametric Estimation in Double-Sampling Designs with Application to PEPFAR," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 12(3), pages 417-445, December.
    7. Stuart G. Baker, 2001. "Discussion of Double Sampling for Survival Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 348-350, June.
    8. Vernon T. Farewell & Jerald F. Lawless & Dafna D. Gladman & Murray B. Urowitz, 2003. "Tracing studies and analysis of the effect of loss to follow‐up on mortality estimation from patient registry data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 52(4), pages 445-456, October.
    9. Ming-Wen An & Constantine E. Frangakis & Beverly S. Musick & Constantin T. Yiannoutsos, 2009. "The Need for Double-Sampling Designs in Survival Studies: An Application to Monitor PEPFAR," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(1), pages 301-306, March.
    10. Constantine E. Frangakis & Stuart G. Baker, 2001. "Compliance Subsampling Designs for Comparative Research: Estimation and Optimal Planning," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 899-908, September.
    11. Martin W G Brinkhof & Ben D Spycher & Constantin Yiannoutsos & Ralf Weigel & Robin Wood & Eugène Messou & Andrew Boulle & Matthias Egger & Jonathan A C Sterne & for the International epidemiological D, 2010. "Adjusting Mortality for Loss to Follow-Up: Analysis of Five ART Programmes in Sub-Saharan Africa," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-6, November.
    12. Agnes N Kiragga & Barbara Castelnuovo & Rachel Musomba & Jonathan Levin & Andrew Kambugu & Yukari C Manabe & Constantin T Yiannoutsos & Noah Kiwanuka, 2013. "Comparison of Methods for Correction of Mortality Estimates for Loss to Follow-Up after ART Initiation: A Case of the Infectious Diseases Institute, Uganda," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-7, December.
    13. Julie Henriques & Mar Pujades-Rodriguez & Megan McGuire & Elisabeth Szumilin & Jean Iwaz & Jean-François Etard & René Ecochard, 2012. "Comparison of Methods to Correct Survival Estimates and Survival Regression Analysis on a Large HIV African Cohort," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-7, February.
    14. Fan Li & Constantine E. Frangakis, 2006. "Polydesigns and Causal Inference," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(2), pages 343-351, June.
    15. Russell T. Shinohara & Constantine E. Frangakis & Constantine G. Lyketsos, 2012. "A Broad Symmetry Criterion for Nonparametric Validity of Parametrically Based Tests in Randomized Trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(1), pages 85-91, March.
    16. Heejung Bang & James M. Robins, 2005. "Doubly Robust Estimation in Missing Data and Causal Inference Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 962-973, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:75:y:2019:i:1:p:133-143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.