[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/metroe/v71y2020i3p487-495.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A note reconsidering a post‐Keynesian model of growth and distribution in the globalization context

Author

Listed:
  • João Gabriel de Araujo Oliveira
  • Joanilio Rodolpho Teixeira
Abstract
We treat an extension of the Metcalfe and Steedman model of growth and distribution in a small open economy with government activity. We show, simultaneously, that certain kinds of taxation and government expenditures will not affect the essential nature of the “Cambridge Equation.” This is important due to the increasing process of Financial Globalization which can be responsible for changing the profit distribution between capitalists and workers. The present note aims at integrating the public sector and the foreign trade together into the model, based on previous literature that, with few exceptions, treats them separately. To do so, a new framework is proposed. Our contribution shows that workers’ income grows when the Current Account in the balance of payments is in surplus, a result not studied by Teixeira and Araújo. The discussion includes recent literature concerning with limits of applicability of such analytical model, dealing with more realistic economies including the process of globalization.

Suggested Citation

  • João Gabriel de Araujo Oliveira & Joanilio Rodolpho Teixeira, 2020. "A note reconsidering a post‐Keynesian model of growth and distribution in the globalization context," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(3), pages 487-495, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:metroe:v:71:y:2020:i:3:p:487-495
    DOI: 10.1111/meca.12285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/meca.12285
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/meca.12285?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pasinetti, Luigi L, 1989. "Ricardian Debt/Taxation Equivalence in the Kaldor Theory of Profits and Income Distribution," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 13(1), pages 25-36, March.
    2. Nicholas Kaldor, 1955. "Alternative Theories of Distribution," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 23(2), pages 83-100.
    3. J. S. Metcalfe & Ian Steedman, 1979. "Growth and Distribution in an Open Economy," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Ian Steedman (ed.), Fundamental Issues in Trade Theory, chapter 16, pages 201-227, Palgrave Macmillan.
    4. Joanílio Rodolpho Teixeira & Jorge Thompson Araújo, 1997. "A Pasinettian Amend to Growth and Distribution in an Open Economy," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(2), pages 205-209, June.
    5. Luigi L. Pasinetti, 1962. "Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 29(4), pages 267-279.
    6. Dalziel, Paul C, 1991. "A Generalisation and Simplification of the Cambridge Theorem with Budget Deficits," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 15(3), pages 287-300, September.
    7. Usamah Uthman, 2006. "Profit-sharing versus interest-taking in the Kaldor-Pasinetti theory of income and profit distribution," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 209-222.
    8. Steedman, Ian, 1972. "The State and the Outcome of the Pasinetti Process," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 82(328), pages 1387-1395, December.
    9. Antonella Palumbo, 2009. "Adjusting Theory to Reality: The Role of Aggregate Demand in Kaldor's Late Contributions on Economic Growth," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 341-368.
    10. Lance Taylor & Duncan K Foley & Armon Rezai, 2019. "Demand drives growth all the way: Goodwin, Kaldor, Pasinetti and the Steady State," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 43(5), pages 1333-1352.
    11. Palley, Thomas I, 1997. "Money, Fiscal Policy and the Cambridge Theorem," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 21(5), pages 633-639, September.
    12. Pasquale Commendatore & Carlo Panico & Antonio Pinto, 2011. "The Influence Of Different Forms Of Government Spending On Distribution And Growth," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 1-23, February.
    13. Massimiliano La Marca, 2005. "The Public Sector In A Model Of Growth And Distribution À La Pasinetti: Existence Of One‐ Or Two‐Class Economies," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(2), pages 157-181, May.
    14. Paul A. Samuelson & Franco Modigliani, 1966. "The Pasinetti Paradox in Neoclassical and More General Models," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 33(4), pages 269-301.
    15. Satya prasad Padhi, 2015. "The Role of Aggregate Demand in Kaldor's Late Contributions to Economic Growth: A Comment on Palumbo," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 442-449, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luca Zamparelli, 2017. "Wealth Distribution, Elasticity of Substitution and Piketty: An ‘Anti-Dual’ Pasinetti Economy," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(4), pages 927-946, November.
    2. Javier López Bernardo & Engelbert Stockhammer & Félix López Martínez, 2016. "A post Keynesian theory for Tobin’s in a stock-flow consistent framework," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 256-285, April.
    3. Linus Mattauch & Ottmar Edenhofer & David Klenert & Sophie Bénard, 2016. "Distributional Effects of Public Investment when Wealth and Classes are Back," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(3), pages 603-629, July.
    4. Javier López-Bernardo & Félix López-Martínez & Engelbert Stockhammer, 2016. "A Post-Keynesian Response to Piketty's ‘Fundamental Contradiction of Capitalism’," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 190-204, April.
    5. Joanílio Rodolpho Teixeira, 2009. "Growth, Distribution, Stability and Government Budget Surplus: The Extended Cambridge Equation Revisited," Economia, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics], vol. 10(2), pages 239-251.
    6. Massimiliano La Marca, 2005. "The Public Sector In A Model Of Growth And Distribution À La Pasinetti: Existence Of One‐ Or Two‐Class Economies," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(2), pages 157-181, May.
    7. Rishabh Kumar, 2015. "Wealth accumulation and aggregate demand stagnation in a two class economy with applications to the United States," Working Papers 1526, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
    8. , Stone Center & Ranaldi, Marco, 2020. "Distributional Aspects of Economic Systems," SocArXiv n7wj4, Center for Open Science.
    9. Petach, Luke & Tavani, Daniele, 2022. "Aggregate demand externalities, income distribution, and wealth inequality," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 433-446.
    10. Marco Ranaldi & Elisa Palagi, 2022. "Heterogeneity in Macroeconomics: The Compositional Inequality Perspective," LIS Working papers 848, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    11. Sasaki, Hiroaki & Asada, Yasukuni & Sonoda, Ryunosuke, 2024. "Effects of Minimum Wage Share and Wage Gap Reduction on Cyclical Fluctuation: A Goodwin Approach," MPRA Paper 121695, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1799 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Stefan Ederer & Maximilian Mayerhofer & Miriam Rehm, 2021. "Rich and ever richer? Differential returns across socioeconomic groups," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 283-301, April.
    14. Thomas I. Palley, 2013. "Cambridge and neo-Kaleckian growth and distribution theory: comparison with an application to fiscal policy," Review of Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 1(1), pages 79-104, January.
    15. Ahmad A. Borazan, 2015. "On the Way to the Great Depression, The Demand Regime of the US Economy (1900-1929)," Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, University of Utah 2015_02, University of Utah, Department of Economics.
    16. Baranzini, Mauro L. & Mirante, Amalia, 2021. "Pasinetti's theorem: A narrow escape, for what was to become an inexhaustible research programme," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 470-481.
    17. Stefan Ederer & Miriam Rehm, 2021. "Wealth inequality and aggregate demand," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(2), pages 405-424, May.
    18. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4093 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Jean‐François Jacques & Antoine Rebeyrol, 2010. "Primitive Accumulation, Growth And The Genesis Of Social Classes," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 540-557, July.
    20. Michaël Assous & Muriel Dal Pont Legrand & Sonia Manseri, 2020. "Samuelson's Neoclassical Synthesis in the Context of Growth Economics, 1956-1967," GREDEG Working Papers 2020-12, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    21. Agliari, Anna & Böhm, Volker & Pecora, Nicolò, 2020. "Endogenous cycles from income diversity, capital ownership, and differential savings," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    22. Soon Ryoo, 2016. "Inequality of Income and Wealth in the Long Run: A Kaldorian Perspective," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(2), pages 429-457, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:metroe:v:71:y:2020:i:3:p:487-495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0026-1386 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.