[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bor/bistre/v17y2017i2p86-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of bank efficiency in Turkey: Participation banks versus conventional banks

Author

Listed:
  • Tugba Eyceyurt Batir
  • David A. Volkman
  • Bener Gungor
Abstract
This study examines the technical, allocative, and cost efficiency of conventional and participation banks in Turkey with data envelopment analysis (DEA) method. In the wake of finding technical, allocative, and cost efficiency results by DEA intermediation approach, Tobit regression analysis is used to determine the factors influencing the efficiency. The main purpose of this paper is analyzing efficiency of the banking system in Turkey and compare the efficiency of participation banks and conventional banks. The results of DEA indicate that average participation bank efficiency is higher than the average conventional bank efficiency each year. Regarding Tobit regression analysis, while expenses and loan quality have a significantly negative relationship with efficiency of conventional banks, they have a significantly positive relationship with the efficiency of participation banks. While the total loans have a significantly positive relationship, external variables have a significantly negative relationship with efficiency of both types of the banks.

Suggested Citation

  • Tugba Eyceyurt Batir & David A. Volkman & Bener Gungor, 2017. "Determinants of bank efficiency in Turkey: Participation banks versus conventional banks," Borsa Istanbul Review, Research and Business Development Department, Borsa Istanbul, vol. 17(2), pages 86-96, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bor:bistre:v:17:y:2017:i:2:p:86-96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845016300953
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Proença, Catarina & Augusto, Mário & Murteira, José, 2023. "The effect of earnings management on bank efficiency: Evidence from ECB-supervised banks," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    2. Salah Mohammed Abdulahi & Mekonnen Kumlachew Yitayaw & Habtamu Legese Feyisa & Wondmagegn Biru Mamo, 2023. "Factor affecting technical efficiency of the banking sector: Evidence from Ethiopia," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2186039-218, December.
    3. Mansour, Rana & El Moussawi, Chawki, 2020. "Efficiency, technical progress and productivity of Arab banks: A non-parametric approach," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 191-208.
    4. Rishabh Goswami & Farah Hussain & Manish Kumar, 2019. "Banking Efficiency Determinants in India: A Two-stage Analysis," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 13(4), pages 361-380, November.
    5. Reindolph Osei Anim & Newman Amaning & Joyce Ama Quartey & Patrick Twumasi Frimpong, 2021. "Exploring the impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Financial Performance of Rural and Community Banks in Ghana," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(2), pages 1-37, February.
    6. Abayomi Oredegbe, 2021. "Cost Efficiency Determinants: Evidence from the Canadian Banking Industry," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(1), pages 1-86, July.
    7. Anju Goswami & Pooja Malik, 2024. "Identifying Financial Performance Drivers in the Indian Banking Sector During the COVID-19 Crisis," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 22(3), pages 667-719, September.
    8. Nazire Nergiz Dincer & Barry Eichengreen & Ayça Tekin‐Koru, 2022. "Manufacturing and service‐sector productivity in Turkey: A perspective from firm‐level data," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(9), pages 2698-2723, September.
    9. Safiullah, Md & Shamsuddin, Abul, 2022. "Technical efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks with undesirable output: Evidence from a stochastic meta-frontier directional distance function," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    10. Abdul Qayyum & Khalid Riaz, 2018. "Incorporating Credit Quality in Bank Efficiency Measurements: A Directional Distance Function Approach," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Girma Jirata Duguma & Jiqin Han, 2021. "Effect of deposit mobilization on the technical efficiency of rural saving and credit cooperatives: Evidence from Ethiopia," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(4), pages 621-647, December.
    12. Safiullah, Md, 2021. "Financial stability efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    13. Mohamed E. Chaffai, 2022. "New evidence on Islamic and conventional bank efficiency: A meta‐regression analysis," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 221-246, January.
    14. Marjanović Ivana & Stanković Jelena J. & Popović Žarko, 2018. "Efficiency Estimation of Commercial Banks Based on Financial Performance: Input Oriented DEA CRS/VRS Models," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 56(2), pages 239-252, June.
    15. Mohamed Mehdi Jelassi & Ezzeddine Delhoumi, 2021. "What explains the technical efficiency of banks in Tunisia? Evidence from a two-stage data envelopment analysis," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-26, December.
    16. HASIB Fatin Fadhilah & LAILA Nisful & SUKMANINGRUM Puji Sucia, 2018. "Comparing The Efficiency Of Islamic Bank In Indonesia And Malaysia," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 70(4), pages 46-67, September.
    17. Habibu Sani & Shazida Jan Mohd-Khan & Mohd Saifoul Zamzuri Noor, 2018. "Microfinance training and the number of loans received by SMEs. An empirical evidence from emerging economy," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 14(2), pages 326-341, April.
    18. Adesina, Kolade Sunday, 2019. "Bank technical, allocative and cost efficiencies in Africa: The influence of intellectual capital," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 419-433.
    19. Özlem O. Akdeniz & Hussein A. Abdou & Ali I. Hayek & Jacinta C. Nwachukwu & Ahmed A. Elamer & Chris Pyke, 2024. "Technical efficiency in banks: a review of methods, recent innovations and future research agenda," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(11), pages 3395-3456, November.
    20. LAILA Nisful & MAULIDIYAH Hikmah & CAHYONO Eko Fajar, 2018. "Comparing The Efficiency Of Islamic Bank In Indonesia And Malaysia," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 70(2), pages 48-67, August.
    21. Hela Kallel & Mohamed Triki, 2024. "Foreign ownership, bank efficiency and stability: Whether the institutional quality of countries is important?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 632-653, January.
    22. Noor Shazreen Mortadza & Rossazana Ab-Rahim, 2022. "Digital Cashless Payments and Economic Growth: Evidence from CPMI Countries," Capital Markets Review, Malaysian Finance Association, vol. 30(2), pages 91-106.
    23. Pérez-Cárceles, María Concepción & Gómez-García, Juan & Gómez Gallego, Juan Cándido, 2019. "Goodness of governance effect on European banking efficiency," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 29-40.
    24. Unal, Huseyin & Masih, Mansur, 2017. "Discerning causal relationship between operational cost and bank profit for commercial banks: Turkish evidence with ARDL approach," MPRA Paper 86391, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Conventional bank; Participation bank; Efficiency; DEA; Tobit; Turkey;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • C29 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bor:bistre:v:17:y:2017:i:2:p:86-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ahmet Palu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rdisetr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.