[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v8y2020i3p39-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Automated Journalism as a Source of and a Diagnostic Device for Bias in Reporting

Author

Listed:
  • Leo Leppänen

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, Finland)

  • Hanna Tuulonen

    (Swedish School of Social Science, University of Helsinki, Finland)

  • Stefanie Sirén-Heikel

    (Media and Communication Studies, University of Helsinki, Finland)

Abstract
In this article we consider automated journalism from the perspective of bias in news text. We describe how systems for automated journalism could be biased in terms of both the information content and the lexical choices in the text, and what mechanisms allow human biases to affect automated journalism even if the data the system operates on is considered neutral. Hence, we sketch out three distinct scenarios differentiated by the technical transparency of the systems and the level of cooperation of the system operator, affecting the choice of methods for investigating bias. We identify methods for diagnostics in each of the scenarios and note that one of the scenarios is largely identical to investigating bias in non-automatically produced texts. As a solution to this last scenario, we suggest the construction of a simple news generation system, which could enable a type of analysis-by-proxy. Instead of analyzing the system, to which the access is limited, one would generate an approximation of the system which can be accessed and analyzed freely. If successful, this method could also be applied to analysis of human-written texts. This would make automated journalism not only a target of bias diagnostics, but also a diagnostic device for identifying bias in human-written news.

Suggested Citation

  • Leo Leppänen & Hanna Tuulonen & Stefanie Sirén-Heikel, 2020. "Automated Journalism as a Source of and a Diagnostic Device for Bias in Reporting," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 39-49.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v8:y:2020:i:3:p:39-49
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.v8i3.3022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3022
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v8:y:2020:i:3:p:39-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.