[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DO NOT MERGE] : WIP: Dump strategy branch in sync with devel #144

Open
wants to merge 160 commits into
base: devel
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

brtnfld
Copy link
@brtnfld brtnfld commented Feb 10, 2021

This is Bin's update_strategy work which is in sync with devel. This is proposed to replace the current dump_strategy branch.

A couple of issues:

(1) the perform_restore test was disabled (like in the current dump strategy branch); we might want to enable that again.
(1a) buffered_particle test was disabled because buffered_particle_dump_restart fails, need to fix.

(3) UNVOXEL is not in devel.

ctest passes (minus tests noted)

Dave Nystrom and others added 30 commits December 30, 2018 16:39
…NL ATS-1 and CTS-1 machines.

Document how to use these two scripts.
…ment

starts out as the Cray default of PrgEnv-intel. This change checks for the
case where the user has modified their module environment and swaps it back
to the case assumed by the build script.
…le sort

implementation. Add build script support for a few more CMake variables that
were missing and should be availble to users of the build scripts.
@codecov
Copy link
codecov bot commented Feb 13, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #144 (417f23a) into devel (6e98503) will decrease coverage by 4.33%.
The diff coverage is 34.32%.

❗ Current head 417f23a differs from pull request most recent head 9982d79. Consider uploading reports for the commit 9982d79 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel     #144      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.52%   76.19%   -4.33%     
==========================================
  Files         123      125       +2     
  Lines        8543     9104     +561     
  Branches     1437     1482      +45     
==========================================
+ Hits         6879     6937      +58     
- Misses       1031     1534     +503     
  Partials      633      633              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/vpic/dump_strategy.h 1.04% <1.04%> (ø)
src/vpic/dump.cc 52.54% <37.63%> (-5.63%) ⬇️
deck/main.cc 47.27% <43.18%> (-10.18%) ⬇️
src/vpic/dump_strategy.cc 60.65% <60.65%> (ø)
src/vpic/vpic.h 83.07% <81.66%> (-1.93%) ⬇️
src/vpic/vpic.cc 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
test/unit/energy_comparison/3d_test.cc 98.00% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
test/unit/energy_comparison/weibel_driver.cc 98.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/util/io/FileUtils.h 0.00% <0.00%> (-66.67%) ⬇️
src/util/io/StandardUtilsPolicy.h 0.00% <0.00%> (-40.00%) ⬇️
... and 5 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@brtnfld
Copy link
Author
brtnfld commented Jun 10, 2021

Brought branch current with devel:

CI test failing: particle_annotation_restart (Failed)

With the skipped test enabled, the same tests fail, as mentioned previously.
5 - particle_annotation_restart (Failed)
7 - buffered_particle_dump_restart (Failed)
8 - buffered_particle_dump_readhdf5 (Failed)
21 - perform_restore (Failed)

#endif
//#define CHUNK_FLAG 1

//#define METADATA_COLL_WRITE 1
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this commented out? It should get better performance when enabled.

// if(!mpi_rank)
// printf("Write original files /w HDF5! \n");
// }
file_exist_flag = 0;
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this hard coded?

//#define HAS_HYDRO_COMP 1
//#define HAS_PARTICLE_COMP 1

//#define HAS_INDEPENDENT_IO 1
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this commented out, so IO is always collective?

@brtnfld
Copy link
Author
brtnfld commented Jul 29, 2022

This implementation seems to have a minimum version of HDF5 requirement, so there should be a check for this in CMake.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants