-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 311
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix sqa storage issue for input_constructors #2791
Conversation
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63442156 |
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63442156 |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: facebook#2791 I recently added storage for input constructors, and our json tests pass for this because json is able to eloquently handle the enum of inputconstructorpurpose since the enum value is a string, however, it looks like sqa storage is not able to do this. Differential Revision: D63442156
f0d695e
to
8c5b810
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63442156 |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: facebook#2791 I recently added storage for input constructors, and our json tests pass for this because json is able to eloquently handle the enum of inputconstructorpurpose since the enum value is a string, however, it looks like sqa storage is not able to do this. Differential Revision: D63442156
8c5b810
to
417e857
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63442156 |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: facebook#2791 I recently added storage for input constructors, and our json tests pass for this because json is able to eloquently handle the enum of inputconstructorpurpose since the enum value is a string, however, it looks like sqa storage is not able to do this. Differential Revision: D63442156
417e857
to
92eea09
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2791 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 95.72% 95.72%
=======================================
Files 490 490
Lines 48413 48437 +24
=======================================
+ Hits 46342 46366 +24
Misses 2071 2071 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63442156 |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: facebook#2791 I recently added storage for input constructors, and our json tests pass for this because json is able to eloquently handle the enum of inputconstructorpurpose since the enum value is a string, however, it looks like sqa storage is not able to do this. Differential Revision: D63442156
46eab37
to
9b2adaa
Compare
Summary: Pull Request resolved: facebook#2791 I recently added storage for input constructors, and our json tests pass for this because json is able to eloquently handle the enum of inputconstructorpurpose since the enum value is a string, however, it looks like sqa storage is not able to do this. Differential Revision: D63442156
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63442156 |
1 similar comment
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63442156 |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: facebook#2791 I recently added storage for input constructors, and our json tests pass for this because json is able to eloquently handle the enum of inputconstructorpurpose since the enum value is a string, however, it looks like sqa storage is not able to do this. Differential Revision: D63442156
9b2adaa
to
fb89696
Compare
Summary: Pull Request resolved: facebook#2791 I recently added storage for input constructors, and our json tests pass for this because json is able to eloquently handle the enum of inputconstructorpurpose since the enum value is a string, however, it looks like sqa storage is not able to do this. Reviewed By: saitcakmak, lena-kashtelyan Differential Revision: D63442156
fb89696
to
dcef8d3
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63442156 |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: facebook#2791 I recently added storage for input constructors, and our json tests pass for this because json is able to eloquently handle the enum of inputconstructorpurpose since the enum value is a string, however, it looks like sqa storage is not able to do this. Reviewed By: saitcakmak, lena-kashtelyan Differential Revision: D63442156
dcef8d3
to
01a0eb6
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63442156 |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: facebook#2791 I recently added storage for input constructors, and our json tests pass for this because json is able to eloquently handle the enum of inputconstructorpurpose since the enum value is a string, however, it looks like sqa storage is not able to do this. Reviewed By: saitcakmak, lena-kashtelyan Differential Revision: D63442156
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63442156 |
01a0eb6
to
2e9e360
Compare
This pull request has been merged in e09033c. |
Summary: I recently added storage for input constructors, and our json tests pass for this because json is able to eloquently handle the enum of inputconstructorpurpose since the enum value is a string, however, it looks like sqa storage is not able to do this.
Differential Revision: D63442156