[go: up one dir, main page]

Theology10101

Joined 22 July 2008

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Theology10101 (talk | contribs) at 14:09, 23 January 2009 (Undid revision 265913325 by Ironholds (talk)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 15 years ago by Theology10101 in topic Please Discuss Here and Sign Your Statements

Users who are known to harass me and are banned from my talk page by the pains of being marked as vandalism

Any further communication on my talk page by these users will result in an automatic vandalism flag
This is your final warning
1. Snowded (talk)


Please Discuss Here and Sign Your Statements

Given your persistent refusal to discuss changes first I have asked for intervention here. I note that you have seen fit to delete previous requests and warnings from your talk page. --Snowded TALK 05:46, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I was the one who started the messages on the talk board and been trying to be productive. I have no doubts that if an administrator looks at what is said and done, that you'll be charged with harassing me by reverting every edit (by not being productive) that I've done and essentially holding me prisoner by stalking my edits and reverting each one of them. I've sourced my contributions, all I ask is to let the objective truth be told, even if you object to Christianity or any other philosophy Theology10101 (talk) 07:18, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


It appears many other users have been having many problems with Snowded (talk) and has been harassing others as well, please see his talk page Snowded (talk) for further complaints on him Theology10101 (talk) 07:55, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

January 2009

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Naturalism (philosophy). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Toddst1 (talk) 06:46, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your concerns Toddst1, I too am concerned because the user Snowded is "not engaging in consensus building" and is reverting every edit I've ever done in what seems to be an attack on me, frankly I don't know what to do in that situation, if you can help me in any way I would be very grateful Theology10101 (talk) 07:05, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply