The Judge

You need to put something in the article and not just a category. Create the article on your own computer and then paste it in. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:25, 1 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ok. Thanks.--The Judge 04:27, 1 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello, you used the {{helpme}} tag. How may I help you? When you've asked your question, please put the tag back so we know to check back. Alternatively, you can join the Wikipedia Bootcamp IRC channel to get real-time help. (Use the web-based client to get instant access.) GeorgeMoney (talk) 22:56, 2 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm having troubles with this Template:Infobox DCAU character I created. It's creating about 4 blank spaces between the section header and the text and the infobox. Example: Black Manta#Other media#Justice League--The Judge 22:57, 2 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've been experimenting with it and here's what I've come up with:

I think the problem lies in the template, somewhere here:

{{#if: {{{nickname|}}} | <tr> <th>Nickname(s)</th> <td>{{{nickname}}}</td> </tr>}}
{{#if: {{{alias|}}} | <tr> <th>Aliases</th> <td>{{{alias}}}</td> </tr>}}
{{#if: {{{species|}}} | <tr> <th>Species</th> <td>{{{species}}}</td> </tr>}}
{{#if: {{{gender|}}} | <tr> <th>Gender</th> <td>{{{gender}}}</td> </tr>}}
{{#if: {{{age|}}} | <tr> <th>Age</th> <td>{{{age}}}</td> </tr>}}
{{#if: {{{born|}}} | <tr> <th>Year of Birth</th> <td>{{{born}}}</td> </tr>}}
{{#if: {{{death|}}} | <tr> <th>Year of Death</th> <td>{{{death}}}</td> </tr>}}
{{#if: {{{occupation|}}} | <tr> <th>Occupation</th> <td>{{{occupation}}}</td> </tr>}}
{{#if: {{{title|}}} | <tr> <th>Title</th> <td>{{{title}}}</td> </tr>}}
{{#if: {{{family|}}} | <tr> <th>Family</th> <td>{{{family}}}</td> </tr>}}
{{#if: {{{spouse|}}} | <tr> <th>Spouse</th> <td>{{{spouse}}}</td> </tr>}}
{{#if: {{{children|}}} | <tr> <th>Children</th> <td>{{{children}}}</td> </tr>}}
{{#if: {{{relatives|}}} | <tr> <th>Relatives</th> <td>{{{relatives}}}</td> </tr>}}
{{#if: {{{alliances|}}} | <tr> <th>Alliances</th> <td>{{{alliances}}}</td> </tr>}}
{{#if: {{{powers|}}} | <tr><th align="center" colspan="2" style="background: {{{colour|}}}; font-size: 110%">Powers/Abilities</th></tr>}}
{{#if: {{{powers|}}} | <td align="center" colspan="2"> {{{powers}}} }}

because if I remove that block it goes away, but when I re-add it, it happens again. I will work on it more, I'm just giving you a heads up on what's the problem. GeorgeMoney (talk) 00:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ok, problem fixed. It was tricky but i managed to get it working. Hope that's ok! GeorgeMoney (talk) 01:11, 3 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well, I just kept moving around the |'s |-'s and !'s and I kept testing it and finally found the right way. GeorgeMoney (talk) 01:24, 3 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well, you'll get used to it after a while. It took me time to learn even how to read them! GeorgeMoney (talk) 01:36, 3 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

PS: Thanks for the barnstar! GeorgeMoney (talk) 01:36, 3 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about tagging your article for speedy, I didn't realize what you were doing, I thought you just made a blank page. --Wildnox 04:24, 4 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:B60s-Clocking.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:05, 4 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

A little help here. What copyright tag is this picture missing?--The Judge 20:14, 4 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

If you're referring to Image:B60s-Clocking.jpg, you need to add what television program it's from and who the copyright holder is to the image description page. --Carnildo 20:29, 4 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

The television show is Easy, but how do I find out the copyright holder? Actually I just realized that's not a screenshot, it's more like a promotional image released for publicity or that sort of thing.--The Judge 20:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Is this good enough?: "Promotional picture of Walter Slazak as the Clock King in Batman".

If you're going to claim it's a promotional image, you need to provide proof that it is indeed from promotional material intended to be distributed widely. Far too many people use the "promotional" claim to mean "I can't be bothered to find out where this is from". --Carnildo 21:21, 4 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

I would agree with having the infobox, and that he shouldn't be edit-warring.

I've left a comment on the talk page and request that people discuss there before making any more reversions.

This should cool down the edit war.

GeorgeMoney (talk) 19:41, 5 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your note. That user was one that was hassling me so much over trivial matters in Superman Returns. I quit editing that page a couple of months ago and no longer watch it. So far he hasn't hassled me about anything else, but that could just be coincidental. Wahkeenah 02:41, 6 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

• It could be worse. You should see what we've had to deal with at the Apollo "hoax" page. Wahkeenah 02:47, 6 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

My thanks for your note as well! -- JHunterJ 02:58, 6 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

what's up, the judge?

since you're practically doing the merge of kara zor-el and supergirl anyway, you might as well change the kara page to redirect to supergirl otherwise we'll pretty much have two of the same article. and if you do that, i would move the Supergirls pic to "other supergirls" and have a solitary pic for the superhero box. what do you think? Exvicious 06:35, 6 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to ask because it's the right thing to do. Are you User:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow? Steve block Talk 12:10, 6 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

No, I'm not.--The Judge 12:16, 6 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hmmm. Okay. Please don't be offended, but I am going to investigate this further. The user in question was banned from Wikipedia, and as I'm sure you can imagine, evasion of a ban is a serious matter. I apologise for my actions, but Wikipedia needs to be protected against banned users, something I'm sure you will agree with. Steve block Talk 12:21, 6 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sure. Go ahead. --The Judge 12:44, 6 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

The spelling of a number of words is wrong, including 'appearEnces', some of the categories automatically put up their tag text, including the 'appearEnces' tags, and so on. I removed it from the Joker page for the same reason. It needs to be fixed, and all pages having it need to be individually spellchecked and reviewed. Good luck fixing it up, hope to see a fullly fucntional IB on the pages. ThuranX 22:20, 7 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

No, the capital E referred to the incorrect spelling. the other problem was the IB was configured, like I said, to put up the tags for each category which were supposed to be invisible, like next to 'number of appearancees, it said ' the number of times the character has appeared' or somethign very similar, and obviously intended to be a no-wiki'd remark statement. I think that most of he significant parts of this debate are going on at the WP:COMICS talk page, and are far bigger than the typos and minor functionality issues. I've put in thoughts there, so I'm going to let you focus there. It does appear that my 'technical' side issues are repaired though, so at least your coding skills are getting better. regards, ThuranX 04:25, 9 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

... This template I just created doesn't work fine, the content doesn't fully hide Template:Appearances

Using Firefox 1.5 I cannot see any real problem. The contents properly hides although the alignment can be improved a bit maybe. --J B 12:11, 8 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

all but the pink line should hide and it's not doing so.--The Judge 21:50, 9 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

It only hides when there are other similar templates that hide. Ryūlóng 23:24, 9 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Regarding this comment: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --InShaneee 14:43, 9 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

User talk:The Judge/Attacks archive of 09-09-06

Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with inappropriate content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. Martinp23 22:21, 9 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Naconkantari 23:33, 9 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

The thing is I want to remove the section and he is rv my own page. I don't want to have it. I could do the same to him. Specially since, the feeling is mutual, and I'm honest. But I'm trying to forget and move on. Do you really think it is well intended not letting me move on?

I really think they might be in some sort of puppet relationship. No offense intended, it's just that they team up too much. How can I put it without sounding like I'm attacking? I don't like that on my page. I think I should only take that kind of warnings from an administrator not from regular people. You know what I mean? The comment bothers me, it comes from no authority and I want to take it off. Can you please take it off from me? That's what I'm asking. Please. Really. If I'm supposed to keep it, can you quote the rule stating so?--The Judge 23:33, 9 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well, you can archive the warnings, but you also have to realize that anyone can edit your talk page and anyone can give you a warning, so long as they feel it is necessary. I'm not an administrator, but if I see you insert "GABBLEGABBLEGABBLEGABBLE" into an article, I can give you a {{test2}} warning. If you really want them off your talk page, read the archiving link. Also, I am replying here because it is easier for you to see my reply; I would prefer that if we continue this conversation, that we copy each others replies to our respective talk pages. Ryūlóng 23:37, 9 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well, thanks That was what I needed to hear. However, from my understanding, I *should* archive, but it is not obligation, you know what I mean? I don't know that to do about those two. Do you see the mean intention in forcing me to keep it?

I recently put an "underconstruction" tag on a page I've been editing, Implying I'm not done up untli 3-4 hours. But CovenantD periodically rv me. How am I supposed to work with that? I see CoventD's poit but I can't continue from the point he is forcing me to. Actually, right now, it is a collection of raw material I noticed another user started from copypasting other articles. I want to work on it and give it some shape. Now I dn't know if I can keep working... It's not fear I put the tag, and according to my understanding he was supposed to respect it.--The Judge 23:56, 9 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well, I would suggest conversing with him. And I realize that you just made an archive in my usersubspace, and I have moved it into yours (before you link to it). Ryūlóng 00:03, 10 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I just copypaste it from yours and forgot to change the names. :P . I can't dialogue with him. Actually I'm kinda scared. A lot of what I've been writting lately has been considered as attacks by Chris, CovenantD, you and I think somebody else, so I'm not gto him ot chirs anymore. I'm afraid they can really block me somehow. They don't talk too much in their talk pages. Chris just refuses to accept any responsability (even though a user besides me told him to chill the first time he attacked me) and ConeventD barely talks. Actually I'd like to avoid them. And I say them because they act almost as team.--The Judge 00:12, 10 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

I would suggest bringing this up at the incidents noticeboard or perhaps try to get a third party to help you. It's a really tough situation. Ryūlóng 00:20, 10 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

I don't know, that sounds hard. I repported him to the 3rr noticeboard. But I don't care, I just don't want to see him anymore. He has been following me to edit war over several articles. The problem is that there is no clear WP rule for or against either of us.

Actually I'm going to confess something to you. I made a big mistake after the first time he was blocked beacuse of me. I noticed several users had similar complaints to mine on his talk page. I talked to them to make them aware there is several people in the same 3rr situation with him... big mistake. They thanked me, but CovenantD got help from chris and started being more "agressive" towards me. It was a very big political mistake on my part, but I thought some sort of intervention would be a good idea since that was a recurring behavior that bother many other people before. But now, I don't want anything to d with him anymore.

Do you know if there is a rule against more than one infobox in a single article? He seems to go by that rule. I go by something I read somewhere in the introduction articles that it is good to use tables and infoboxes to organize the information better. According to what I undesrtoos that's better than ussing only paragraps.--The Judge 00:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

This is definitely a situation that needs mediation. Also, is this helping at all? The copying and pasting, I mean. Ryūlóng 00:39, 10 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

I think it looks like an atractive idea, but it's Saturday and I have to go out. The problem is that it looks too dificult. Well maybe because I'm tired, but maybe it will provocate them further.

What's the deal with canvassing? I mean I see how it backfired me, but technically there is nothing wrong with it. That's how you gather an intervention in real life. I felt CovenatD was being unfear to several of us, so I comunicated. The other guys even thanked me knowing what I was doing. I relly felt identified with the way CovenatD treated them.--The Judge 02:23, 10 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Could you please complete it? I need diff times, etc. Thanks, alphaChimp^(talk) 01:01, 10 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Let's see. First off, you transcluded his userpage. I fixed that. You need to: 1) post diff times 2) post original version and version time 3) post time of 3RR warning 4) post warning diff, 5) properly link to article name. I think that's about it. alphaChimp^(talk) 02:25, 10 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Per a finding at checkuser, this is a sockpuppet of a blocked user[1]. CovenantD 02:51, 11 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. See block log. (toolbox: contributions • page moves • current autoblocks)

huh?--The Judge 04:53, 11 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

 

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Judge (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't have a reason, I don't fully understand my blocking. I get the basic picture of what you say, but not the justification

Decline reason:

CheckUser is a tool, restricted to a very few trusted administrators, which can be used to identify the IP address from which a Wikipedia user edits. A request for checkuser was filed to determine whether you are the same as User:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow, who is currently serving a six-month ban. The investigation showed that you were. Sorry. — Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 06:28, 11 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

That's the part I get. But I don't get why.--The Judge 14:34, 11 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.