Personisgaming

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Buckley Air Force Base; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Garuda28 (talk) 00:02, 27 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Julietdeltalima. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Lazarus Group, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please be careful with capitalization, as well. "Computer Intrusion" and "Second" were incorrectly (and inexplicably) capitalized. Thanks for your close attention to this. Julietdeltalima (talk) 19:46, 27 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please stop adding the category "National Security Agency Field Sites Directorate". There is no such category on Wikipedia, so it shows up as a redlink. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:41, 29 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

I thought the field sites directorate was called "Directorate F"

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lazarus Group, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:19, 30 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Red Apollo (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Apollo (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Is there a formal cause for deletion?

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Leschnei (talk) 12:48, 9 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Geolodus (talk) 07:20, 13 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hey, could you start using edit summaries as shown above? ☆ Bri (talk) 02:17, 9 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lazarus Group, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Railfan23 (talk) 19:40, 28 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Helix Kitten. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Railfan23 (talk) 19:45, 28 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Personisgaming (talk) 20:48, 28 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

ATTN:Working on new article

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button   located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Railfan23 (talk) 23:50, 3 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Railfan23. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Railfan23 (talk) 00:10, 4 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi, you might want to work on your new article Capital One data breach to actually be about the breach, and to remove the name of the person indicted. WP:BLPCRIME states "For relatively unknown people, editors must seriously consider not including material—in any article—that suggests the person has committed, or is accused of having committed, a crime, unless a conviction has been secured. Schazjmd (talk) 00:53, 4 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

I see her name has been in the Capital One article for awhile, unfortunately. Still, your new "main" article on the breach needs to have more information than is in the Capital One article (presently, it has much less) and the accused is not the "perpetrator" until convicted. Schazjmd (talk) 01:15, 4 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Capital One data breach, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 12:43, 4 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dridex, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aqua (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 4 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Capital One data breach, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:40, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

These links are already in the infobox.[1] Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:35, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/SureWeCan3 online, 2 PM Sunday, Sept 6. Jim.henderson (talk) 00:19, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Personisgaming. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ElectricFish".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 02:12, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

November 21st, 11am-1pm E.S.T: NYC COVID-19: Environmental Justice in Public Health Edit-A-Thon - ONLINE

Hello Personisgaming!! You are invited to join the Brooklyn based Sure We Can community for our 2nd NYC COVID-19 themed Wikipedia Edit-a-thon / translate-a-thon - ONLINE - this Saturday, Nov 21st, 2020 11am - 1pm. The edit-a-thon is part of Sure We Can's work with NYC Health + Hospitals to stop the spread of Covid-19. We plan to continue to work on translating the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City article into the many languages spoken in New York City; as well as, work on other ideas about how wikipedia could slow the spread of Covid-19. Please join us, we'd love to see you (online). Saturday November 21 NYC COVID-19: Environmental Justice in Public Health Edit-A-Thon - ONLINE (optional RSVP on-wiki). 11:00am - 1:00 pm E.S.T online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms available)

--Wil540 art (talk) 22:22, 2 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Wil540 art: Dear Wil540 art what facility in Brooklyn will the edit-athon take place ? Personisgaming (talk) 18:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Personisgaming - The event will take place online but it is hosted by Sure We Can, a redemption center and environmental organization located in Bushwick, Brooklyn. --Wil540 art (talk) 19:24, 16 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Template:Epstein Sex trafficking Scandal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --TheImaCow (talk) 14:54, 22 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Death of Hal Ketchum, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Seagull123 Φ 19:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Looks like this was taken care of above. Any questions just let me know. Red Director (talk) 21:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Personisgaming. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Capital One data breach".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:38, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited BASHLITE, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Symantec.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 6 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nikolay Bogdanovsky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 35th Army.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 26 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited APT40, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Proofpoint.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Ghislaine Maxwell has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Keivan.f^Talk 22:46, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking scandal has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 03:20, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Carding sidebar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:55, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

 Template:US Scheduled Substances has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello Personisgaming, I see your recent Update tag on the Rhysida (hacker group) article. Do you have any links to sources or news that should be included? Chumpih ^t 04:58, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the question; You can see here for sources @Chumpih.

https://www.google.com/search?q=Rhysida+(hacker+group)&sca_esv=537cb7f0bc786b92&hl=en-US&prmd=invmbstz&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiHtsXz-LSEAxVvIjQIHcHUA64Q0pQJegQIBhAC&biw=1556&bih=887&dpr=1.75 Personisgaming (talk) 13:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for that. Are there any in particular that warranted the 'update' notice? I see the ones there are before the article date, or mention the British Library hack, which has its own article. Chumpih ^t 13:22, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

So perhaps it's not clear what needs to be updated. Have removed tag for now. Chumpih ^t 23:57, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Landon Ingraham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward Patterson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Lyane Leigh has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. DB1729^talk 23:43, 3 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mustafa Badreddine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lebanese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply