[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sara Macliver (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged for BLP sourcing issues since 2020. Not clear that the subject passes WP:GNG. 4meter4 (talk) 16:00, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Passes GNG I don't believe the nominator checked all sources. I have found a lot of coverage about them using Google and other search engines Monophile 💬 10:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Monophile Which of the sources are both independent and have significant coverage? What am I missing here? I am not seeing even one source that is both independent and has in-depth coverage.4meter4 (talk) 18:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and Australia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. @Monophile Here is a source analysis of every source and external link in the article currently. Not one meets the criteria at WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 18:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Source | Significant? | Independent? | Reliable? | Secondary? | Pass/Fail | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
"Directory Search Results". directory.uwa.edu.au. | Broken url, but its a directory listing with no attributed author. Unclear if it is a secondary source of information. Lacks in-depth coverage. Fails WP:SIGCOV. | |||||
Ryan, Gavin (2011). Australia's Music Charts 1988–2010 (PDF ed.). Mt Martha, Victoria, Australia: Moonlight Publishing. p. 173. | Brief mention in a table. No in-depth coverage or discussion. Fails WP:SIGCOV | |||||
"ARIA Awards – Winners by Award". Australian Recording Industry Association (ARIA). Retrieved 12 November 2018. | A primary source, so can not be used to prove notability as it is not secondary. Fails WP:SIGCOV | |||||
Sara Macliver website | Not actually a website of the subject. Bach cantatas is a website anyone can edit, including the subject, just like wikipedia. Not reliable. | |||||
*Naxos website | Lacks independence from the subject as it is her record label. Fails WP:SIGCOV | |||||
Post Newspapers interview | Interviews are considered WP:PRIMARY sources because they typically don't involve fact checking and lack independence from the subject. Fails WP:SIGCOV. | |||||
Total qualifying sources | 0 | There must be multiple qualifying sources to meet the notability requirements
|
- Keep. Verifiably Satisfies three criteria of WP:NMUSIC by being nominated for ARIA Awards and charting on Australia's main album chart and releasing multiple albums on ABC Classics. duffbeerforme (talk) 21:51, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- A very quick search found [1] and [2] in addition to the two album reviews I've added to the page. A simple BEFORE found stuff. Try it. duffbeerforme (talk) 23:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep has significant coverage in reliable sources such as the Sydney Morning Herald newspaper linked above by Duffbeerforme. Also has charted on Australia's national album chart for a pass of WP:NMUSIC in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 20:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)