- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 22:26, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Krishna Shroff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks significant independent coverage and mostly relies on promotional content, particularly for Matrix Fight Night. The tone suggests potential paid editing, violating Wikipedia’s neutral point of view. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 19:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Businesspeople, Women, and Maharashtra. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:10, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep I really don't understand why this article is being proposed for deletion. the article meets Wikipedia's criteria WP:GNG. Moreover, reliable media sources, which are verified by Wikipedia, have covered news about this person. Additionally, I did not find any sentence in the text that promotes Matrix Fight Night (There is just a Mention).Parwiz ahmadi (talk) 12:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The article does not qualify for a Speedy Keep.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 21:45, 6 October 2024 (UTC)- Keep Editing can clean up the conflict of interest aspects of the article. The sourcing looks okay to me. Doha Dear (talk) 00:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. I'd like to also hear from more experienced editors.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep WP:TOI is a reliable source provided that paid advertorials are not used. The sources used do not seem to be paid advertorials. The article requires some rewritting to ensure neutral point of view, but the subject meets WP:SIGCOV and hence is notable.Contributor892z (talk) 12:06, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.