Yorkshiresky

 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:37, 17 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

On 23 June 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Stanley A. McChrystal, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:58, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

thanks for adding the date reference on A Serious Man --Ring Cinema (talk) 15:17, 29 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

No problem, the ref was there previously. But an over zealous editor removed it when trimming the plot.yorkshiresky (talk) 16:10, 29 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

The August 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:59, 1 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

I have nominated Philip Dodd, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Dodd. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 12:26, 1 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

The September 2010 project coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting five coordinators from a pool of candidates to serve for the next year; members are invited to nominate themselves if interested. Please do not vote yet, voting will begin on September 15. This message has been sent as you are registered as an active member of the project. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:50, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:Grenata street gang.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:41, 9 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:41, 9 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

On 15 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Longitudinal Video Recording, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 14:39, 15 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Ian Christie (film scholar) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Alpha Quadrant ^talk 20:09, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

The September 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:29, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Great minds think alike! We must have started writing the same article on about the same day, after getting our copies of Mojo. Anyway, let me know what you think. I'd be happy to nominate it to "Did You Know" as a collaboration, maybe after a few more tweaks to it. Regards, Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:08, 8 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

I noticed you added back in succession boxes for some articles including The Wonder of You. While the general opinion in various discussions at WT:CHARTS is leaning against them, a true consensus has not been reached and it would be great if you can add to the discussion to give reasons why you prefer to have them for songs and albums that went to number one on any chart.

Here is a link to summary of issues that I brought up when trying to come up with a compromise for succession boxes back in March: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 35#Proposal for use of succession boxes for #1 albums/singles. Below are a number of comments culled from the various discussions on similar and other problems people have with them. You can find links to the entire history of the discussion at WT:CHARTS#Consensus on use of succession boxes?.

• "A labyrinth of every imaginable component chart and airplay chart"
• "A succession box where neither the predecessor nor the successor has an article isn't a useful navigation tool"
• "Succession boxes are not to present information. They are not to document the number of weeks on a chart. ... They are a navigational tool."
• "Succession boxes [relating to music articles] are an indiscriminate collection of information as "Excessive listing of statistics" that is not notable to the subject"
• "They are a "navigation tool" to other number one "Songs" and Albums that really have no connection with the page they are on."
• "The information contained in the boxes is often unsourced (particularly the dates) and relies on other Wiki articles to determine what came before and after the article topic on the charts."
• "People are posting incorrect dates concerning the time frame that a song is at #1 on Billboard's charts"
• "We don't have to include the nav-boxes so people can find this information, since we have all these lists"

In addition to the above, I see them as unnecessary and redundant, especially since I am providing links to lists of #1 charts, which still may be a bit excessive. Thanks. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 23:25, 12 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

On 14 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kathy and Carol, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:02, 14 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Octoberr 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:49, 1 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

On 20 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bigger Trees Near Warter, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that measuring 15 feet by 40 feet, Bigger Trees Near Warter is the largest painting by David Hockney? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 06:04, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

On 21 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article So It Goes (Nick Lowe song), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that "So It Goes" by Nick Lowe was the first record released on Stiff Records? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

On 28 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Queen and Country (artwork), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Queen and Country is an artwork by Steve McQueen which commemorates the deaths of 155 British soldiers as a set of postage stamps? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 28 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

The November 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:59, 1 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Colour state has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since October 2006. I can find no reasonable sources for this, therefore if fails the core policy of verifiability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sven Manguard Wha? 23:30, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

The December 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:09, 4 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Jim McSherry has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ironholds (talk) 17:25, 14 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 14:00, 25 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

The January 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:19, 1 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

On 1 February 2011, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article John Barry (composer), which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:59, 1 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

On 19 February 2011, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010–2011 Belgian government formation, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Modest Genius ^talk 22:20, 19 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

The February 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:21, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! Your submission of Frankie & The Heartstrings at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:22, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

On 13 March 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Frankie & The Heartstrings, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that members of the indie rock band Frankie & The Heartstrings met at a calypso night in a Sunderland pub? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:33, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading File:King-curtis-live-at-fillmore-west.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 09:16, 27 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I've reviewed your DYK nomination of Live at Fillmore West - could you please see my comments at T:TDYK#Live at Fillmore West? Prioryman (talk) 08:25, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Fine now, thanks! Prioryman (talk) 18:58, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Notability on Wikipedia is not a question of counting how many Google hits the topic did or didn't get in any given week, nor is it a matter of splashing sources all over a deleting administrator's talk page after the deletion is over. A page can be deleted at any time if it doesn't already make an actual statement of notability (the article as written didn't; it just asserted his existence) which are already referenced to reliable sources (the article as written didn't have any; blogs and twitter feeds don't count).

Speedy deletion doesn't mean that nobody can write a better article in the future; it just means that that the particular version of the article in question didn't cut it. You're free to try rewriting the article at any time to better explain his notability, using some of the sources you had ready to throw at my talk page — but Wikipedia administrators can't read your mind to know what you intend to add to the article in the future; we can only judge the article as it actually stands at the time we see it. Bearcat (talk) 05:00, 29 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Just to clarify, I wasn't "offended by your posting to my talk page", as you implied in your response — but administrators do get a bit frustrated sometimes at being told that "Topic X is notable because of this gigantic list of new sources that weren't in the article at the time it was originally deleted". It just happens way too often, that's all. Sorry if I gave the wrong impression. But you're right, the new version is a more solid and genuinely keepable article. Bearcat (talk) 15:53, 29 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks for your encouraging comment regarding Isaac Perrins. I knocked it out in 24 hours after seeing one sentence in an economic history journal which I was actually using further to develop W & J Galloway & Sons & another article I've been drafting on and off for some weeks.

Now for the kicker ... For some reason I thought using modern comparative values in a form such as "£20,000 (£2.2 m today)" was deprecated on Wikipedia. If it is not then I have a host of areas that could benefit from this. I wonder if the best treatment would be to cite the site your mention in your DYK review next to the comparative figure, which would enable people at least to get a grasp of the implications. If you have time then I'd appreciate your views. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 12:59, 29 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I can't find anything specific which counsels against using inflation adjusted values, MOS:CURRENCY#Currencies doesn't have anything to say on the matter. There are articles which explicitly have these values e.g. List_of_most_expensive_paintings#List_of_highest_prices_paid_at_auctions_or_private_sales_.28inflation_adjusted.29 I wouldn't go overboard with it, adjusting every value and I agree you could use the site I used as a ref. yorkshiresky (talk) 13:38, 29 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, esp for the example proof. I'd just show one adjusted figure and then the reader can, as the Yanks say, "do the math" themselves for the others. - Sitush (talk) 14:01, 29 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

The March 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 21:17, 3 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

On 7 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Live at Fillmore West, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that saxophonist King Curtis was stabbed to death a week after releasing his album Live at Fillmore West? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mary Leigh, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/WleighM.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:16, 11 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

On 15 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Egyptian Halls, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that although described as one of the finest buildings in Glasgow, The Egyptian Halls may be demolished? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Mary Leigh, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/WleighM.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Mary Leigh and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Mary Leigh, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Mary Leigh with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Mary Leigh. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Mary Leigh saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! NortyNort (Holla) 09:38, 19 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello, responded to you here.--NortyNort (Holla) 21:39, 19 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello. This article has come due for administrator closure. While it has certainly come a long way, I note that it still contains derivative elements of the original (some of these are documented at the article's copyright problems board listing, although it's not an exhaustive list). The article needs more work if it is to be retained, but no rewrite has been proposed. Since you have obviously put a lot of effort into it, I wanted to ask you if you planned to address the outstanding issues.

Also, while I'm here, I need to note that I've reviewed your correspondence at User talk:NortyNort, and I understand that you had intended to paste the source article in your userspace as a starting point for you own. I'm afraid that Wikipedia's terms of use do not allow such copying of non-free content in any space. Before you hit "save" on Wikipedia, you really need to be sure that all content you are added complies with terms of use. Additionally, there are challenges in that model of working. In order to avoid creating a close paraphrase, it's best to rewrite from scratch. Writing over existing content runs a substantial risk of retaining too much of the language and structure, both elements which may be copyrighted.

Please let me know here or at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2011 April 18 if you'd like more time to address these concerns. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 18:05, 26 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

The April 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 22:54, 1 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I wanted to take a second and thank you for setting up List of dates of the end of the world. It's something I've been thinking for the past few months would be great addition, but somehow I never thought to get off my tail and create it. Thanks!

KNHaw ^(talk) 08:10, 19 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your kind words and the expansion you did on the article. hopefully we'll be around after this weekend to enjoy it ;-) yorkshiresky (talk) 13:03, 19 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

The May 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:55, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

On 8 June 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Berwick Rangers F.C. 1-0 Rangers F.C., which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Berwick Rangers 1-0 defeat of Rangers in 1967 has been described as "the most astonishing result ever returned in Scottish football"? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Calmer Waters 00:53, 8 June 2011 (UTC) 18:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Yorkshiresky. There's a meetup being planned for Tuesday. See this page on Meta-Wiki for details. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:57, 17 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

The June 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:47, 2 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

The July 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:25, 2 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manchester United F.C. 8-2 Arsenal F.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manchester United F.C. 8-2 Arsenal F.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 22:24, 28 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

The September 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk | contribs) 16:47, 30 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Voting for WikiProject Film's October 2011 project coordinator election has started. We are aiming to select five coordinators to serve for the next year; please take a moment from editing to vote here by October 29! Erik (talk | contribs) 12:08, 15 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

The October 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk | contribs) 15:10, 31 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

The October 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk | contribs) 22:45, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Freedom and Rain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Richard Thompson

Ragged Kingdom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Guardian

Robin Denselow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to New College

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 8 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi. In List of directorial debuts, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Portland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 19 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi. When you recently edited 1977 Scottish Cup Final, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tommy Burns (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 1 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

The December 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk | contribs) 22:12, 4 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

On 7 January 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1889 Scottish Cup Final, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in the 1889 Scottish Cup Final, conditions were so poor that the players threw snowballs at each other? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1889 Scottish Cup Final.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:04, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. When you recently edited 1974 Scottish Cup Final, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Harry Hood and Steve Murray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 8 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. When you recently edited John Talabot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Producer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 4 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of cinematic firsts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Jim the Penman, Film projector, Al Johnson, Richard Davis and Bound for Glory

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:24, 18 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. When you recently edited List of cinematic firsts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Napoleon (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 26 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

The January 2012 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

To unsubscribe, please remove your name from the distribution list. GRAPPLE X 00:45, 4 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of directorial debuts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to The Awakening (film) and Darkness Falls

Best Laid Plans (2012 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to David Blair

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 6 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

for reinstating the missing information for the Paralympics opening ceremony article - I hadn't realised quite so much had been culled! 86.133.210.76 (talk) 11:29, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

No problem, seemed to be a very bizarre and unconstructive edit to make.yorkshiresky (talk) 12:06, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gambit (2012 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Universal

Private Road (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to BFI

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 4 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited My Teenage Dream Ended, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Friday (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 11 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Berwick Rangers F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newcastle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:55, 19 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Sinking of the Titanic, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Episcopal, Guggenheim Museum and Cork (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 1 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

On 3 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Sinking of the Titanic, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the musical work The Sinking of the Titanic by Gavin Bryars was originally a sheet of typed instructions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Sinking of the Titanic. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Yngvadottir (talk) 00:03, 3 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Machine Music, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://wolffifth.blogspot.com/2011/06/65-john-white-gavin-bryars-machine.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 15:19, 3 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Machine Music, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Derek Bailey and Sandra Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:32, 8 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of directorial debuts, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Baazi, One More Day and Phool (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 15 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of songs recorded by Saint Etienne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tim Burgess (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 26 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Stephen Hunt (footballer born 1956), without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 09:16, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

On 2 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1975 LaGuardia Airport Bombing, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 1975 LaGuardia Airport Bombing which killed 11 people remains unsolved? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1975 LaGuardia Airport Bombing. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:03, 2 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neil Paterson (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Paterson (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Keithbob • Talk • 17:15, 21 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Daydreamer (David Cassidy song), has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Daydreamer (David Cassidy song)" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 17:59, 24 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

On 25 May 2013, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Article name, which you recently nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Danger ^{High voltage!} 00:43, 25 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Catapult (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dutch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 23 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Richard Matheson may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• writer Richard Matheson dies aged 87|publisher=LondonEvening Standard|accessdate=26 June 2013}}</ref>
• *''[[Burn Witch Burn (film)|Burn Witch Burn]]'' (1962); a.k.a. ''[[Night of the Eagle]]'' (screenplay co-written with [[Charles Beaumont]] and [[George Baxt]] based on the novel ''Conjure

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:26, 26 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sunshine on Leith (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Time Out (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 3 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of British films of the 2010s is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of British films of the 2010s until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. => Spudgfsh (Text Me!) 16:53, 4 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:StEtienneWordsandMusicCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:53, 19 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Goodmorning, a little while ago you wrote an article about Ms Grace by The Tymes. I, writer on the Dutch, made an article with some more info about the song. Orleans did record it, but only on Orleans Live, an album made for the Japanese market.Greetings,Ceescamel (talk) 07:01, 13 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I don't know if you're aware but there is a wikimedia meet up in Leeds this Saturday (14 June) if you're interested. Hopefully you can make it. Regards IJA (talk) 18:18, 11 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard De Aragues is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard De Aragues until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 20:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of directorial debuts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page My Best Friend. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

  User:Yorkshiresky/Berwick Rangers F.C. 1-0 Rangers F.C., a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Yorkshiresky/Berwick Rangers F.C. 1-0 Rangers F.C. and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Yorkshiresky/Berwick Rangers F.C. 1-0 Rangers F.C. during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 22:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  User:Yorkshiresky/Newcastle United F.C. 5-0 Manchester United F.C., a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Yorkshiresky/Newcastle United F.C. 5-0 Manchester United F.C. and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Yorkshiresky/Newcastle United F.C. 5-0 Manchester United F.C. during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 22:04, 14 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lists of financially notable films, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 24 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

On 24 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William Morales, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that William Morales' attorneys claimed the police confiscated his fingers as evidence? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Morales. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, William Morales), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of NME covers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walker Brothers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 23 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of NME covers, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Nerve and Tom Jones. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please see note on your DYK review. Yoninah (talk) 16:23, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please see new note on your review. Yoninah (talk) 22:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

On 31 August 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Outdoor Miner, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "Outdoor Miner" by the English rock band Wire was covered 19 times on a 2004 tribute album? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Outdoor Miner. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Outdoor Miner), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 31 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm really sorry for having blanked that section, I really didn't meant to. It was all an accident: I was trying to delete something else and I didn't notice that I have cancelled that section. I saw that just after you told me. I'm really, really sorry. :-( By the way, I wouldn't ever delete intentionally something THAT important. AleCapHollywood (talk) 20:46, 2 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

No problem, thanks for letting me know. Editing got a bit messy with people edit warring his cause of death. yorkshiresky (talk) 20:52, 2 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wait, I just understood why I have cancelled the Coen brothers collaboration section. While you were adding the section, I was editing that page as well: I was deleting a grammar error and I have saved the page after you did, deleting your edit. Once again, I'm really, really sorry. :-( AleCapHollywood (talk) 20:59, 2 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited BBC Four Goes Slow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ingleton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 6 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! Your submission of Gösta Peterson at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 18:15, 11 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

There have been further issues with the nomination, which was pulled back from prep for additional review. Please respond there as soon as possible. Many thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 00:19, 2 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Energy Flash, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EDM. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 8 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

On 11 October 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gösta Peterson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Swedish photographer Gösta Peterson met his wife at a cocktail party, where he was watering the flowers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gösta Peterson. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Gösta Peterson), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 11 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! Your submission of Ed Rush at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:33, 17 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yorkshiresky, this is your final call to address the outstanding issues for this nomination. Please respond right away; if we don't hear from you in the next few days the nomination will have to marked for closure. Thanks for your attention. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:40, 3 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

There's been a further comment from the reviewer. Please return to the review as soon as possible. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:45, 15 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! Your submission of Ed Rush at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:10, 20 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Chirnside F.C. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable amateur sports team, no reliable sources, fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jellyman (talk) 17:00, 9 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Yorkshiresky. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Sumo book".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 19:26, 25 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

I just wanted to let you know I edited a lot of formatting issues on List of songs recorded by Pet Shop Boys.

• Album names get italicized. You over-linked them, also.
• You over-linked the writer's names. Too many instances of it. I removed them.
• You left "The" at the end of song names. I'm not sure if this was a copy and paste oversight. I fixed it. --Jennica✿ / ^talk 21:24, 2 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of songs recorded by Pet Shop Boys, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages George Clinton and Please (album). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Climate of France, from its old location at User:Yorkshiresky/Climate of France1. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:22, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

	The Real Life Barnstar
	Thank you so much for this. It's great to see, nice work! "I drank a jar of coffee, then I took some of these"  :) >SerialNumber54129...speculates 19:09, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Seconded. Ceoil (talk) 19:14, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much! Glad you liked it. yorkshiresky (talk) 23:59, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Norma Waterson (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Thompson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 13 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Boyd Jarvis, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Levert and Evelyn King (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi there,

My name is Sonia, and I write for The Washington Post. I'm interested in pursuing a story about Wikipedia users who update/edit pages detailing specific histories of the Academy Awards (e.g. "List of black Academy Award winners and nominees," "90th Academy Awards"). I believe you might have edited a similar page recently, perhaps during the ceremony. People who are simply curious often end up on these informative pages, and I believe our readers might find it interesting to hear the story behind the quick edits — are there some Wikipedia users who wait for the awards to be announced and then update the pages immediately? How do you keep track of all the history? And so on.

If you'd be interested in chatting with me, please let me know as soon as possible. I can be reached at sonia.rao@washpost.com.

Thanks! Sonia

Soniarao23 (talk) 16:35, 5 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Aseriousman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 15 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Climate of France, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 20 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Yorkshiresky (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, can someone explain why I've been blocked. I haven't done any edits since 20th March either in my user account or any other account.

Accept reason:

I don't know what hell my problem is... please accept my apologies; this block was not intended for you. I'm unblocking your account now... ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:32, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Stand by... I'm looking. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:31, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much :-) yorkshiresky (talk) 13:47, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

No problem - please excuse my stupidity and have a great rest of your day. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:50, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Yorkshiresky. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Climate of France".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:00, 19 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bill Gold, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barbarella (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 23 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for finding a source for Paddy McAloon's date of birth and adding it to his bio. You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. I've gone ahead and added that source to back up your recent addition to June 7. Please be sure to include sources with additions to these pages as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 20:16, 9 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ken Nordine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rosemont (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 7 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! Your submission of Penelope Endersby at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! David Eppstein (talk) 00:33, 22 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Green Guide.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 2 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! Your submission of Penelope Endersby at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 13:48, 22 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

On 5 December 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Penelope Endersby, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that this month, the armour and explosives researcher Penelope Endersby became the first female Chief Executive of the Met Office? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Penelope Endersby. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 5 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Richard De Aragues has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced stub. Does not meet WP:BLP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. » Shadowowl | talk 09:51, 7 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard De Aragues is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard De Aragues (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. » Shadowowl | talk 09:53, 7 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! Your submission of Coldwar Steve at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 18:36, 30 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

On 20 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Coldwar Steve, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Twitter satirist Coldwar Steve creates most of his works on a phone while travelling to work by bus? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Coldwar Steve. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Coldwar Steve), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 20 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi, this might interest you: Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates.--Phibesfan (talk) 18:50, 23 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

On 26 March 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Scott Walker (singer), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

Black Kite (talk) 23:42, 26 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi Yorkshiresky, I replaced the citation of businesstelegraph.co.uk that you added to Coldwar Steve (in Special:Diff/878602841) with a citation to the original article from The Guardian. The businesstelegraph.co.uk domain appears to be a collection of scraped articles from other publications, and we should avoid linking to that domain per WP:ELNEVER. Please see WP:RSN § businesstelegraph.co.uk for details. Thanks. — Newslinger talk 00:27, 12 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello Yorkshiresky! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:42, 7 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap fillers - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

 

Greetings,

Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.

It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.

Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap filler - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!

Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Britain's Best Sitcom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Good Life. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply