Vvven

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bolívar (state) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Canaima

Campeche (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mangle

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 31 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi. When you recently edited Quintana Roo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mangle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Campeche, Campeche (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Church

Ica Region (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Marcona

La Libertad Region (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sierra

Lambayeque Region (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lambayeque

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Vvven,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Atlantic Building should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atlantic Building .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, The Banner _talk 21:42, 10 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi Vvven, I saw you translated some articles from spanish wikipedia very well. I recently have translated some spanish article called Independence of Trujillo but it was tagged as bad translation or some like that. Please if you had some time some day I would thank you checked it and get it better to get out that tag. If you're too much busy I understand. Thanks anyway. Best regards.--Twicettowns (talk) 18:48, 10 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Vvven! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:22, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:22, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Just lettng you know that I'm editing the German horse breeds template to be consistent with the other national templates for horse breeds. Montanabw^(talk) 19:49, 12 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Vvven. You have new messages at Montanabw's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

 Template:Music originated in Europe has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 22:46, 18 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please join the conversation at Talk:Association football. Your addition of "the king sport" as a nickname for association football is somewhat confusing. --Khajidha (talk) 09:59, 31 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hola LUIS, AL de Portugal al habla,

por favor, deja el nombre al inicio tal como está. Sin duda, es un nombre Catalán, pero lo dejamos todo en ESPAÑOL (y no catalán, ni basco, ni gallego), para simplificar. OK? También, algunos usuarios ponen (u han puesto) que (ejemplo) Carles Puyol es un jugador catalán, y no lo es, es un jugador español, punto.

Gracias, buena semana --AL (talk) 19:09, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

• Yes i know, you only changed the template and not the player's nationality, but even so it's not correct in terms of WP edits, we use only NATIONAL naming customs, not GEOGRAPHIC naming customs. Thanks --AL (talk) 19:18, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Oh i see, you reverted me again. Fair enough, i am going to ask for mediation. --AL (talk) 19:20, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Tourism in Chile page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help), a broken reference name (help) and a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 26 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

I tried to fix these references, are so because I have not been able to pute effectively. These are clear and current references, are the same reference of that page in the wiki in Spanish. These days I'm going to continue translating what is needed to improve the article, also will be almost all the same images of the wiki in Spanish, since that is the language of Chile, and thus has contributed and improved but in that article in spanish.

I need your help to fix the references without deleting. --Vvven (talk) 02:29, 26 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tourism in Argentina may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[tropical climate]] in the north, through a vast expanse of [[mild climate]] and natural wonders (like the [[Aconcagua]], the highest mountain in the world outside the [[Himalayas]], the widest

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:31, 31 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Tourism in Honduras page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 6 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

just and are the only that had problems that were with the "centuries". i fixed but the others articles is that in fact not exist.. thanks--Vvven (talk) 17:06, 6 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Ecuadorian dogs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 00:16, 13 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal.

Erick (talk) 23:54, 13 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Western Saharan cuisine page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 18 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Lady of Elche page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 21 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for creating Chichiriviche, Vvven!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please note that bold text should be used very rarely, and never for emphasis: see MOS:BOLD for more.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Malabo page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 8 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I just came across your new Malespín article. Yesterday I saw the film Jaula de Oro, about a trio of Guatemalan teenagers, and the word "tuanis" was used. I looked it up and found this web page. It may not be of any consequence to you but I just felt like sharing the coincidence. —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:54, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Villanuco de Las Encartaciones page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:White people#Ever-expanding infobox. Thanks. NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:29, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I thought you said, "i will try to fix on twelve images." Twelve of the thirteen lived when white people was also a racial category as described on the page, but he didn't. So, can he be the one we throw off?--Carwil (talk) 01:55, 11 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Scottish dogs has been nominated for merging with Template:English dogs. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Cavalryman V31 (talk) 10:39, 20 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Irish dogs has been nominated for merging with Template:English dogs. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.Cavalryman V31 (talk) 10:38, 20 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Vvven, Why have you written that Ch is considered a single letter in Old Spanish? Is it a convention used in abecedaria of the time when Old Spanish was a living language or a convention of modern Spanish philologists? I know that Antonio de Nebrija did consider Ch and Ll to be letters, but was this convention common? RAE considered Ch and Ll to be letters not from its foundation, but from 1754. Burzuchius (talk) 15:34, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Had to revert your edits on List of music artists and bands from Argentina. As much as you'd like to list everybody, Wikipedia is not a collection of stuff. Lists are there to organize and direct people to articles. If an entry does not have an article in en.WP then it does not belong, as clearly stated in the edit notice on the page. If you fell an entry should be there, please write the article first and assert notability. -- Alexf^(talk) 23:06, 28 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Please DON'T move churches in Spanish-speaking locations to "...de (Place)". This is English Wikipedia and you should use English forms per our guidelines. It also makes the subject a good deal less clear to English-speakers without Spanish. Thanks. Johnbod (talk) 13:40, 20 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

I answered in the User talk:Johnbod--Vvven (talk) 18:47, 20 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

I see you've moved it to the appropriate article, and for that thanks. But the sources are terrible. You've copied some of this from [1] and it is your responsibility to check the sources. Not only can I not even find one, random websites by non-experts can't be used as sources, and one of your sources is an artist, not an archaeologist or runologist. Doug Weller talk 12:11, 22 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Doug Weller Well, i think can be valid, Valeriĭ Ivanovich Guli͡aev is from the Institute of Archaeology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, is one of the sources that suppor this theory, other one as Mariana Accornero is a author of books specialized towards the artistic manifestations of the Indigenous of the Americas, and the latter Miguel Angel Scenna (1924-1981) was an renowned Argentinian historian "He published many books and articles, among which stand out for its impact. He was a regular contributor to the magazine Everything is History, directed by Felix Luna, where he published many articles. He was considered a moderate member of the revisionist trend.". some even could be more valid resources than other many in the hiphotesis sections in the article--Vvven (talk) 23:34, 22 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Let's look at your Russian source. It says Valeriĭ Ivanovich Guli͡aev Pre-Columbian travels to the Americas: myths and realities University of Texas. Pub. Abya-Yala, 1992 pages 186 et seq. What does the University of Texas have to do with this, and could you please quote some of what he says from his book that backs this?

And quotes from Mariana Accornero and Miguel Ángel Scenna, "Antes de Colón", Universitary publisher of Buenos Aires, 1974, page 79. I

This should be at the article talk page and I'm copying some of it there. By the way, your attempt to notify me didn't work. It only works if you add it, correctly, the first time you save an edit. If you revise the edit later adding a "ping" it won't work. Doug Weller talk 17:58, 23 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

You've got to follow these guidelines or your edits are copyright violations. This applies to Walls of Philip IV and I think to at least one other article where you copied material:

If copying or moving via "transwiki" from another Wikimedia project that is licensed under CC BY-SA (such as Wikimedia Commons, Wiktionary, and Wikispecies), you may satisfy attribution either by providing a complete list of authors of the original content (the complete list can be generated by copying the history of the remote page) or by providing a direct link to the original material. If the list of authors is brief, this may be provided in the edit summary. A direct link (such as an InterWikimedia link) should be included in the edit summary; the template {{Interwiki copy}} is available for the article's talk page. If leaving a list of authors, please also provide a URL to the original page in case it becomes necessary in the future to access that history. (See Help:Transwiki.)

Although most Wikimedia projects are licensed under CC BY-SA and require attribution consistent with the Foundation's Terms of Use, some projects are handled differently. For example, content from Wikinews is licensed under CC-BY and may be reused with attribution only to "Wikinews." (See Wikinews:Copyright.) It is the responsibility of the editor importing content to determine the license that applies and ensure that attribution is satisfied.

Translations of copyrighted text, even from other Wikimedia projects, are derivative works, and attribution must be given to satisfy licensing requirements. When translating material from a Wikimedia project licensed under CC BY-SA, a note identifying the Wikimedia source (such as an interlanguage link) should be provided in an edit summary in the translated page, ideally in its first edit. Where applicable, the template {{Translated page}} can also be added to the talk page to supplement copyright attribution. You may use an edit summary like (using French as an example) Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

In copying material here, remember you take responsibility for the sources and also for any copyright violations in the original articles - hopefully there won't be any but we frequently find copyright violations in our articles, so it isn't impossible. Doug Weller talk 18:09, 23 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Doug Weller ok thanks, but i really need you help me with the requests, of the sources editors, but is well known that all these created articles were of constructions that existed--Vvven (talk) 19:13, 23 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Doug Weller look, the Walls of Philip IV doesnt have a rough translation, is just i left its gates its complete names--Vvven (talk) 19:13, 23 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Oh they should have articles, I'm not questioning that. But I'm finding it hard to understand some of Walls of Philip IV. I can't help with the sources, I'm afraid. Doug Weller talk 19:41, 23 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Muslim Walls of Madrid page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help) and an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 26 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Black people. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kendall-K1 (talk) 21:22, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

i get youre confuse, wiriting a kind of threat on my talk page saying you will block me just for be im debating some on a article that i consider not fair, you evident not agree on my position, i m debating but also respecting to the people discussing on the talk page, i even invited to the discussors to debate in that talk page, i think that you need block or other measure for threat in a far way without sense--Vvven (talk) 21:28, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

I refer to your recent move of Marquesado del Carpio to the new title Marquisate del Carpio and invite you to the article's talk page to discuss this move.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Marquisate_del_Carpio

Best, - Clark Sui (talk) 04:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm the current coordinator over at DRN. Your request there has been removed because it was not made through our listing bot using the "Request dispute resolution" button at the top of the page. Manually-filed requests breaks our maintenance bot. I would ordinarily recommend refiling through that button, but your request would have been declined even if you did because DRN, like all other forms of moderated content dispute resolution requires extensive talk page discussion, preferably at the article talk page, before seeking assistance through dispute resolution. Please try discussing the matter at the article talk page in question. If the other editor will not discuss, consider the recommendations made here. If that comes to a standstill after extensive discussion, please feel free to refile (using the button mentioned above). Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 17:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC) (Not watching this page)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Spanish knights orders page, your edit caused an empty citation error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 4 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm Kudpung. Vvven, thanks for creating Al-Andalusian palatial complex and neighborhood of San Esteban!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article is not of sufficient quality o of English for an encyclopedia.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:50, 23 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Helo there VVVEN, from Portugal,

in all my years of editing in here and in soccer (nearly ten), I have never seen writers address the naming of a footballer as such ("known in SPAIN/PORTUGAL/GERMANY/whatever as"). We choose the name by which the sportsperson is most widely known, for 99,999999999% of his career so far, he has been called "Saúl".

I trust you will accept this judgement, only wanting to help. Attentively, happy editing --Be Quiet AL (talk) 00:13, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harlem Renaissance. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:44, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at New Black Panther Party, you may be blocked from editing. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 00:39, 24 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

ok thanks to think of me lol i feel at least readed. i'll check that--Vvven (talk) 23:47, 1 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Sacromonte page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Vvven -- I saw that you changed (moved) "Hispania Baetica" to "Baetica". I couldn't find any discussion about this, and I'm curious as to why you changed it. I'd like to learn why "Baetica" is better than "Hispania Baetica".  – Corinne (talk) 03:58, 9 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Well, when i saw Lusitania, a Roman province of the former Hispania, abbreviated, I wanted to pair them, also i saw checking that was said also as abreviated by the Romans self, i dont made the same with hispania Tarraconensis, cuz would come a some troll, or some crtical that could revert, so i made a bit carefully making just one, are you right with that, i dont care much that articles though--Vvven (talk) 04:08, 9 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Well, since I know very little about that period in history, I don't know whether your change was a good one or not. I guess we'll find out if others agree or not.  – Corinne (talk) 04:34, 9 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Me too--Vvven (talk) 04:42, 9 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

I see that you added content in the article on Ferdinand I of León which you translated from es.wiki. I have added the translation template in the talk page, something that must be done whenever you translate from another wikipedia, as was mentioned previously in your talk page. I will be going over the translation since some parts are unintelligible. Regards, --Maragm (talk) 17:33, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

you should not delete all the translation with the intention of fixing it later. First, because you can replace the translation arranged two months later or maybe within two years, and second because anyone, and not only you, can arrange translation. so just you should not take the initiative. I will revert your decision, waiting for someone wishes to improve the translation, anyone with a native level in English can improve it because it can understand--Vvven (talk) 18:19, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

I reverted your edits since in you seem to have deleted previous text that was well-referenced, and also due to the faulty translation. Will be adding more from es.wiki but only if info is not already in the article. --Maragm (talk) 18:21, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

I'll put the references early posting by others users who contributed. but give me time, a short time--Vvven (talk) 18:24, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

The translation is awful. You have erased referenced text. The lead should be a summary, not as long as it is now. If you want to keep it, fix it: translation, references and all. --Maragm (talk) 18:27, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

it I see it as as a summary of several events, and neither see long when compared to other articles of the same indoen on the rest of Europe, I will return references and continue translating. It is what I can do. anyone else going to visit, administrator, amateur, interested, specialist or native English can is their right to pass to correct grammatical errors and sentences, and so is made as quickly and contribution as possible--Vvven (talk) 18:36, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

If you cannot write in proper and correct English, then maybe you should not do so in this wikipedia. Nobody else is under the obligation of fixing your mess. You have destroyed a perfectly good and referenced article. --Maragm (talk) 18:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Perfect was neither is, if so had a "golden star". and just some translating, and i saw, it was very incomplete. also it had enough paragraphs difficult to understand, with sentences that look like did not read the formerly and over putting them. after this article, I will continue to improve other Iberian medieval kings's articles, adding new sections not mentioned, instead of trying to discredit me and insult my work deliberately, for a few errors, which in many articles I've been doing Users to have arranged, or thank me several administrators/users, you might as well help improve it--Vvven (talk) 18:50, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Now are added the references and relevant information that i deleted (along with the information and references that I add). Arranged.--Vvven (talk) 19:41, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Vvven, if somebody offers to fix your translation, you should let them and not revert them. I have reverted to the version Maragm was working on. Srnec (talk) 19:42, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

and How people will see, to fix it, unless the interested see this discussion, and if he is too much interested it will fix, if that comes to watch the revert to see if it's worth doing. I do not think, it's better to do as I indicated, that what any see at first glance, think or not to fix it, and so could be arranged--Vvven (talk) 19:48, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

You can report me as you want, I think I'm right, I'm just improving and developing the article... I included all the old article, adding new important information, references and new images related. I have not reverted anything--Vvven (talk) 20:00, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

and I will make time to do the same with other articles of iberian kings that are now very incomplete, even some of them yet a stub--Vvven (talk) 20:17, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your only contribution was badly translating paragraphs from es. wiki, without even attributing as per license requirements. You did no research, did not check any books, merely added info from another wikipedia, some of which was already in the original version in English, therefore some info is redundant and duplicated. Before you "translate" any more, please learn some proper English so that others don't have to do the dirty work. --Maragm (talk) 00:59, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

See that you erased your remark. FYI, I reported your disruptive behavior and editing. --Maragm (talk) 01:31, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

On Jule 2016 my English skills improve a 99 % of its perfection--Vvven (talk) 22:14, 18 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

I see that you have translated many articles from the Spanish Wikipedia but that you are not indicating that this is the case. I suggest you read Translating from other Wikimedia projects: "Translations of copyrighted text, even from other Wikimedia projects, are derivative works, and attribution must be given to satisfy licensing requirements". When you start translating an article, you can indicate this in the edit summary or you can paste the following template as I have done in Convento de la Natividad y San José where I pasted in the respective talk page of the article, the following template: {{Translated page|es|Convento de la Natividad y San José}}.

Above you say: "On Jule 2016 my English skills improve a 99 % of its perfection". I'm afraid that, just by looking at some of your recent edits, that your English still needs to be improved if you want to add content to this wikipedia without the need for someone else to correct the grammar and make it comprehensible. --Maragm (talk) 13:19, 19 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Abbey of Santa Engracia page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 22 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Leaning Tower of Zaragoza page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 23 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Vvven, first of all, do not ever call me or any other female Wikepedian "honey". That is condescending and "machista". Secondly, the note you wrote above is full of grammatical errors. Your English is not good enough and you should not be editing in en.wiki. I would say that all of the articles you created are not in proper English and either you fix them or someone else will have to waste their time in doing so, and it's not going to be me. Rather than tackling the translation of articles on Iberian monarchs, you should correct all the articles you created and also add the translation template since you have not done so, only in a couple after I mentioned that it was mandatory for licensing purposes, for example, Castle of Burgos. Should you continue to insist on mis-translating, I will have no other choice than reporting you again as I did earlier this month. --Maragm (talk) 11:30, 23 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

I also notice in your user page that you mention the name you had previously and the articles you created under that account. Again, same problem with your English translations from es.wiki and lack of attribution (translation template or edit summary).--Maragm (talk) 13:54, 23 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Tell me honey can i now expand some monarchs's articles, and related, because are too shorts, not as should to be that topic's articles, and besides do not have images contemporaries of their times, but artists's imaginary from centuries later, not best images for that, a more contemporary image has significance besides are closer to real. Please look to my translations, that on my user's page articles marked with nc (nice). Look please i want to, for larger, more images, and you'll watching, and i most, to be you changing just a few. Check my High Quality images, all very well-sources, with right dates, as most as it is possible found on internet. i now uploading a whole British book on drawings of locations in the Spain of early-19th century--Vvven (talk) 04:31, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Vvven, first of all, do not ever call me or any other female Wikepedian "honey". That is condescending and "machista". Secondly, the note you wrote above is full of grammatical errors. Your English is not good enough and you should not be editing in en.wiki. I would say that all of the articles you created are not in proper English and either you fix them or someone else will have to waste their time in doing so, and it's not going to be me. Rather than tackling the translation of articles on Iberian monarchs, you should correct all the articles you created and also add the translation template since you have not done so, only in a couple after I mentioned that it was mandatory for licensing purposes, for example, Castle of Burgos. Should you continue to insist on mis-translating, I will have no other choice than reporting you again as I did earlier this month. --Maragm (talk) 11:28, 23 July 2016 (UTC) Would appreciate if Black Kite chimes in and gives his opinion. --Maragm (talk) 11:41, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

I truly really sorry if you felt offend, i just say you like a pretty because firstof all youre a lady i want you show aprreciate , always in my life im against with machism, that empathy and love to female's rights is part of me. second, i just try to better the articles at most, and each time fixing, is not matter of just one edit, or one month. you saw that each time i do it with all my articles created, my english is not too bad, but also is not too good, but in a mearly future, idk, maybe 2 or 3 months will be better and the articles develoved by me these articles on my userpage will be more spelling and more developed, better. i don't know where you say on castle of burgos there some a violation. Some Castle of Burgos images came from a book of 500 years old, almost all imeges of 100 years old and more has right to shows in wikipedia. the rest of aarticle is just a translation from es.wiki. there many people with less English skills than me and people dont threats them to get out from wiki, or say to them that dont write in wiki. Of one or another way i'm helping--Vvven (talk) 16:03, 23 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

In my real life the female rights i felt it so much, and defend if you would know because the women is more intelligent and perfect, and i'man but with life i knew that. With that articles translates from es.wiki and other external references, i will each more adding better references and try each more on be more understandtable them, following the patterns of English grammar, is all i can do in the present but is not i can do in a future--Vvven (talk) 16:03, 23 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please DON'T create "Iglesia de..." titles, ever. They should normally have the form "Church of San Jorge, Manzaneda" for village churches, not Iglesia de San Jorge (Manzaneda). For churches in larger cities, the style San Julián Obispo, Burgos is best. I have looked at the Spanish Wikipedia - not a single church is titled using "Church of...". Please reciprocate. "Monastery" etc titles should also be in English. Johnbod (talk) 14:55, 18 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Ok as in "San Luis Obispo, Salamanca" I get it. Thank you for gift your time, almost among the most valuable thing in life, the time. to improve this side of the wikipedia.--Vvven (talk) 17:13, 18 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks =D, do the real life things, how many awesome things you can realize--Vvven (talk) 17:30, 18 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Greetings! I appreciate your enthusiasm, but before you create a stub template and/or category, you should propose its creation at the stub sorting project. As a Spanish language stub type did not exist, there's probably a good reason for that; if there were need for it, we'd know that, too. Unless you can find 60+ articles that would use this template and category, it would be better to delete the category and "upmerge" the template. Please come and have a look at WPSS for guidelines. (Also, please don't put a "maintained by WPSS" banner on a category about which WPSS knows nothing.) Her Pegship (talk) 23:32, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:56, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:10, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

The name of this song is raptor house created by dj baba in venezuela, the term tuki, is an insult they use in to refer to this music, so I think that should be modified the title of the article by Raptor house. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sala.x.sala (talk • contribs) 12:32, 17 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm Graeme Bartlett. Vvven, thanks for creating Barlovento, Venezuela!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. excessive use of "it" and awkward choice of English words when translated.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:01, 23 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Boconó, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dr. K. 03:02, 2 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Alcázar of Toledo page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

See my talk page. An editor says you are copying the results of a machine translation into this article, and you are edit warring to insert your preferred text. You can respond to that complaint if you wish. If you continue to revert, you are risking a block for disruptive editing. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:34, 25 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://www.toledo-turismo.com/en/convent-of-carmelitas-descalzos_273. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 03:01, 5 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Convento de San Antonio de Padua, Toledo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.toledo-turismo.com/en/convento-de-san-antonio-de-padua_274. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 03:53, 5 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

Category:Former Visigothic buildings and structures, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:19, 17 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello Vvven,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Puente Colgado (Aranjuez) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 08:16, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at WP:ANI regarding repeated copyright breaches. The thread is Copyright breaches by User:Vvven. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 09:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello. I am Diannaa and I am an administrator on this wiki. Prose you find online is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the law to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. There's more information about copyrights and how it applies to Wikipedia at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. Copyright law and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. This is your final warning. — Diannaa 🍁; (talk) 11:51, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Says Dianna that the next time I will block. I ask for a moment of consideration, maybe it will block a troll or a person who is creating articles of buildings that were important part of the history of countries when they were erected, however it is difficult for another person to create--Vvven (talk) 21:07, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Sorry but adding copyright material to this website violates the copyright policy of this website and of copyright law. If you do it again, I will block you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:18, 9 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

See the page. I did not do anything illegal. Just put dates, and important data as it is "classic architecture" and little else. Has no violation, only actual data. And use that page as a source.--Vvven (talk) 23:31, 9 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi again Vvven. I have removed some content from your user page, as it's not appropriate content for userpages on this wiki. It reads more like an advertisement. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:13, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi Vvven, some time ago I mentioned that it was necessary to indicate if an article you created was a translation from another wiki. You should go over all the articles you translated and in the discussion page of the article insert the corresponding template, as I just did in this article. Regards, --Maragm (talk) 08:01, 9 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm Mduvekot. Vvven, thanks for creating Puente Colgado (Aranjuez)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article needs references providing substantial coverage from independent, reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 20:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm Mduvekot. Vvven, thanks for creating Sephardic Museum!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article needs more references to substantial coverage in independent, reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 02:32, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm Mduvekot. Vvven, thanks for creating Convento de las Agustinas Calzadas, Toledo!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article needs more references to substantial coverage in independent, reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 02:32, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for creating Palacio de Benacazón, Vvven!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for this; could you please see if you can address the tags?

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 18:48, 8 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Vvven. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Puy du Fou Toledo, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Salimfadhley (talk) 23:07, 7 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Category:2021 architecture requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 05:28, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Soy residente en Aranjuez y nativo del anglofono y jubilado con solo un poco Español. Tu pudes usar mi correo electronico asi: User:Timpo Saludos: Timpo (talk) 09:46, 3 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vvven (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Let me tell you that I'm a bit retarded, and that shows in this, I can not answer those questions for everything I have to learn and I can not, I just can not, I know everything but a better explanation than the one I gave I can not give, as I said I've diagnosed some retardation, I charge a pension for that, but nothing to ruin my work on the internet or anything, but there is something in which I stand out, in what I am good, and it is in translating pages from the Wikipedia in Spanish to the Wikipedia in English, demonstrating it on many of the pages i create, I invite you to come through my userpage to see part of my translations, and I say I assure you that I am going to commit nothing else in translating from that wikipedia, please allow me to do it, it is one of the few things that I can do in my life, is not going to repeat what I did previously, I swear, WP blocked me just once but it will not happen again.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks and no admin has decided to weigh in. You are welcome to request another unblock, but if you do so, please rewrite your request. Yamla (talk) 01:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 

The article House of the Jesuits, Cartagena has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article does not meet Wikipedia's guidelines for inclusion in the encyclopedia, specifically the general notability guideline and verifiability policy.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  --- Α Guy Into Books™ § (Message) -  01:24, 28 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vvven (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please, I already learned the lesson, I do not copy any text from another website, only from wikipedia, and the language I know, from Wikipedia in Spanish, please let me do it, it's a lesson that blocked me for almost a year, for that and other things, because I love to write in wikipedia, I will not miss in that rule. The wrong Q1: What licence is Wikipedia published under? Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License This is related to the images, the images must be included by own photo or when the author has died after 100 years according to US laws and, the GNU Free Documentation License : this is applicable without changing a single word, the text made by recognized authors, or by permission of the author already expressed. To copy a text, you have to ask the author, and also put it on the talk page of the article, I will not do so, that to be clear, I will just copy from the wikipedia in Spanish mostly, and create some STUBS with references--Vvven (talk) 18:41, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This is incorrect. Images are not listed under that license by default. That is not how you reuse text published elsewhere. It looks like you don't understand WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:FAIRUSE. Yamla (talk) 11:59, 7 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

 

The article Toche (Gocho Spanish) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. This article is only a list of meanings for a regional Spanish word, with no indication of encyclopedic significance.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Largoplazo (talk) 13:10, 2 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

I used to read it but I always refused the answer, but good. Since there is no other option I accept the Standard Offer. Thank you for giving me that opportunity but you can assure me that after that time of sanction you will unlock my two accounts, this one and above all that of User:ILoveCaracas that I would like to use it after my sanction is fulfilled. Could we reach that agreement of the Standard Offer (from right now?). I dont undestand that of "can adequately address the copyright issues you have" but surely I will (just tell me what that means)--Vvven (talk) 11:33, 21 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

I suggest that you review the reason you were blocked and the declined unblock requests above, including the policies other administrators linked to in them. You will have plenty of time to do so before you come back six months from today(not before October 21st, and assuming you did not create additional accounts). If you still do not understand the reason you were blocked, you won't be unblocked even in six months.

Both your usernames will not be unblocked. If you decide that you no longer want to use this account after it is unblocked, you can then request unblock on the other account, stating that you want to abandon this one. I don't know if that will succeed, but you can try. 331dot (talk) 11:45, 21 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

331dot Sir thats somewhat hard, I honestly tell you I have some problems to give a convincing answer for more than I read a lot something. I was born with that defect, it's more I tell you that I'm sure people read my thoughts (my mind), but I've never moved that into wikipedia, I've made excellent articles since I stole the other account, I'm just saying that I'm a good editor, but at the moment to give you a convincing answer I can not do it, review the previous declinings, if you knew how it cost me a lot to give those answers and I re-read a lot it and thats did not help with this.--Vvven (talk) 11:53, 21 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your responses do not need to be formatted as unblock requests unless you are actually requesting to be unblocked. If you are going by the Standard Offer as you claim, you should not do so.

If you are physically or mentally unable to answer the questions given to you, I have nothing but sympathy for you, but editors must have the capacity to adequately communicate with other editors and discuss issues that come up. This requirement does regretfully prevent some people from contributing, but it is necessary for Wikipedia to function.

I also see that you are Venezuelan; perhaps you would find it easier to contribute to the Spanish Wikipedia, if you don't already. Your block only applies to the English version. 331dot (talk) 12:02, 21 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much, yes life is very hard for those of us who do not have a voice like other minorities yes have, not only for that but for the things that nobody knows that we have to live some of us (especially because we do not like anyone!), but I do not say never that because be a victimist is the most stupid, I only ask that all of you administrators consider that It's hard for me to give 'good' answers when I have to give this--Vvven (talk) 12:07, 21 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Category:Destroyed landmarks in Spain demolished during the Spanish Civil War, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:29, 3 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Category:Destroyed landmarks in Spain demolished during the Second Spanish Republic period, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:31, 3 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Category:Destroyed landmarks in Spain demolished between 1925 - 1931, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:33, 3 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vvven, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions) 19:20, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Category:Destroyed landmarks in Spain demolished during the Medieval Spain, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:44, 24 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Category:Destroyed landmarks in Spain demolished during the Francoist Spain period, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:40, 18 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Category:Partially demolished landmarks in Spain, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:45, 2 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Category:Destroyed landmarks in Spain demolished during Habsburg Spain, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:56, 2 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Category:Destroyed landmarks in Spain demolished by period, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Iglesia de San Pedro Mártir (Calatayud), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://www.calatayud.org/enciclopedia/spedro_martir.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Iglesia de San Pedro Mártir (Calatayud) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Iglesia de San Pedro Mártir (Calatayud), in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Iglesia de San Pedro Mártir (Calatayud). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Iglesia de San Pedro Mártir (Calatayud) with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Iglesia de San Pedro Mártir (Calatayud) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! FAR (talk) 12:57, 27 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Tourism in Venezuela has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An enormous article with only a handful of references, this is basically a tourism ad rather than an encyclopedia article. I came here because someone had added that Caracas was a murder capital - I wanted to revert that, but once I saw that almost the whole article is uncited, I found myself asking why should one opinion should go while others stay? From the head tag, it appears that this has been the state of the article for at least four years, so I think we should get rid of it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ubiquity (talk) 19:01, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tourism in Venezuela is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tourism in Venezuela until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ubiquity (talk) 21:00, 22 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Festivals in Tarazona requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:11, 1 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Sport in Tarazona requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:02, 4 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Category:History of Tarazona requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:36, 12 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Buildings and structures in Tarazona requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:35, 20 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Maltese dogs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:30, 9 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Can de Chira has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can find absolutely no sources at all

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cavalryman (talk) 23:37, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Hierran Wolfdog has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, sources cited not RS, nothing notable could be located.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cavalryman (talk) 11:52, 6 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Colombian dogs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kind regards, Cavalryman (talk) 01:25, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Puerta de Córdoba (Seville) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://culturadesevilla.blogspot.com/2015/04/sevilla-oculta-puerta-de-cordoba.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:51, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Monument to victims of the attack against Alfonso XIII requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.pasionpormadrid.com/2010/04/monumento-las-victimas-del-atentado.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:03, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Churches completed in 1537 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:03, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Category:Greater León has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Super Ψ Dro 12:15, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Balneario da Toxa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://elmundodedoodo.wordpress.com/2011/06/08/gran-hotel-la-toja/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 03:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Puerta del Campo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://artevalladolid.blogspot.com/2011_11_01_archive.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 08:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Casa Consistorial de Tarazona requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://tarazonamonumental.es/patrimonio-2/ayuntamiento-de-tarazona/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 06:55, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Category:Theatres in Castilla–La Mancha has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:27, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply