UserTwoSix

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battery saver is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battery saver until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:50, 8 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi UserTwoSix! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! _signed, Rosguill ^talk 02:50, 8 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cavedog Entertainment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Taylor. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 24 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at League of Legends. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop repeating the same edits with inappropriate formatting. This article is a GA, and having had your edits challenged you need to stop and discuss, instead of just continually repeating them. -- ferret (talk) 00:11, 22 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Away (TV series), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 02:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ho, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hoe.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 14 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hey. Thank you for your considered statements over the last couple weeks at Talk:United States Electoral College. I wanted to expand on a string of Congressional reform addressing state mal-apportionment in federal elections. I noted previously, efforts to curb state majority abuses included three Acts of Congress passing both House and Senate in an effort to shape political communities that resembled the underlying populations geographically, socially, and ideologically (the culturally-related basket of religion, ethnic practice, and politics): contiguity (1842), and compactness (1872), including equal population (1911) (but only for a few sessions at a time, and never enforced).

If we expand the observation from listing Acts of Congress to exploring who was sponsoring them, the topic takes on an interesting aspect of US political intellectual history. The 1842 legislation was sponsored by Jacksonian Democrats, the 1872 by Lincoln Republicans, and the 1911 by Republican and Democratic Progressives. Wiki-fencing on Talk pages notwithstanding, I understand the impulse to the National Popular Vote generally to be aligned with that intellectual tradition. To take another page from the same democratizing impulse, if the states abuse their Constitutional duty to elect US Senators by their legislatures for thirty consecutive years as they did in the Gilded Age, then the American people will pass a Constitutional Amendment taking the abused trust away from the bad actors subverting their democratic republic.

So it is, that if the states do not refrain from the egregious anti-democratic practice of winner-take-all selection of their presidential electors, I expect that in due time the American people will take away the state legislature role in choosing a president, in one way or another. I will regret the loss of political community that might follow uniform standards for redistricting by equal population, contiguous boundaries, compact shapes, and respecting political boundaries aligned with the state geography. But the voting people are sovereign, at the very least, even if the non-voting populations of the voters' neighbors who are immigrants, young, and transients are left out of the national equation the future.

But whenever a persistent political majority takes form of the same opinion, it must be allowed to prevail, or we lose the American experiment that the London Economist last week noted is the political reason that Americans respect themselves and why others around the globe in turn respect them. - TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 16:51, 16 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Non-uniform rational B-spline, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spline.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 31 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Mars Helicopter Ingenuity. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 21:45, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

I have begun a new move discussion to Ingenuity (helicopter) @ Requested move 20 February 2021. I apologize for making the move as there seemed to be some consensus for something of the form Ingenuity (x) where x != "rotorcraft". I hope you will join me at the discussion. @BilCat: UserTwoSix (talk) 22:13, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Under WP:QUALIFIER there do not appear to be extensive guidelines for Parenthetical disambiguation and so maybe you could explain why "Mars helicopter" is not a good disambiguator. UserTwoSix (talk) 22:52, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

It's actually in the first paragraph of the section you linked to, particularly the second sentence. BilCat (talk) 23:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

I see what you are saying w.r.t. "when a more detailed title is necessary to distinguish an article topic from another, use only as much additional detail as necessary" however Ingenuity does not look like a "helicopter" to me, but I can see it classifies as one. I can see it as a UAV, a rotorcraft, or a "Mars helicopter" (however there aren't many of those are there?). UserTwoSix (talk) 23:10, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

The lack of a single appropriate disambiguator is part of the reason we went with the current title as a natural disambiguator. BilCat (talk) 23:25, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

But it is not the correct title anymore. It was called the "Mars helicopter" and then "Ingenuity", and someone moved the page to "mars helicopter ingenuity" when it should be "Ingenuity (disambiguator)". UserTwoSix (talk) 23:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

I realise you're trying to be helpful, but the 'forecastle' is the very front of a ship, under the foredeck; it's not the upper deck. By tradition, it's where the ordinary sailors (of merchant ships) sleep. (Naval ships had much larger crews, who needed more space.) Please read WP:COMPETENCE. Philip Trueman (talk) 18:13, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I didn't know what it meant and I assumed others might not too. I just took the definition from the first sentence of the forecastle article: the forecastle "is the upper deck of a sailing ship forward of the foremast". UserTwoSix (talk) 18:20, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

I put the full definition in. UserTwoSix (talk) 18:22, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Philip Trueman: Since you seem sure that the latter definition is more suitable, I have put it first in The Nigger of the "Narcissus". Is this definition better? UserTwoSix (talk) 18:30, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

As you've done it as a footnote, not inline, I think it's fine. Perhaps not everyone will agree, but I'm OK with it. Be aware that there are special considerations when it comes to what goes at the very start of an article - see WP:LEDE.

I have nominated Guinea pig for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:03, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Cannabidiol, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The source you used is not a secondary or reliable WP:MEDRS reference. Choose reviews in medical journals when sourcing content applying to human health or diseases. Zefr (talk) 18:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hi UserTwoSix! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Cannabidiol that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. - Sumanuil (talk) 00:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Sumanuil:, Sorry I get a little sloppy when I make a bunch of edits and I try to mark them appropriately. I looked at the edits and I see formatting ones, a grammatical correction, adding a wikilink, and changing the heading. So I guess you mean changing the heading. I thought I wasn't changing the meaning and it was a better heading. But I appreciate the link to what a Minor Edit is because I really should read the page through. UserTwoSix (talk) 02:57, 14 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please stop changing this redirect. Other editors believe there is a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. To have it changed, you need to start a redirect discussion and gain consensus. MB 23:36, 19 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

@MB: No one has commented on the Talk Page about the reason for a primary topic. UserTwoSix (talk) 00:28, 20 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Coffee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coffee shop.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Category:Nazi-appropriated items has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:14, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Pornography in Japan, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. KyloRen3 (talk) 06:22, 11 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I changed the short description for this article from your version "Designed to prevent immunity against SARS-CoV-2" to "Designed to provide acquired immunity against against SARS-CoV-2", since the vaccine provides rather than prevents immunity. -- The Anome (talk) 17:50, 24 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cheese on toast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Toast.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 27 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

[1]

Do you have a reference for the claim that bullets can be used against zombies? Philip Trueman (talk) 09:57, 30 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page TMI. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should:

• Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
• Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
• Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
  • Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
• Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
• Do not insert external links or references

Thank you. TJRC (talk) 21:18, 1 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article San Francisco bridge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/San Francisco bridge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MB 04:59, 5 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Flaked cereal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Nightmare Rarity_{Enter the palace} 18:31, 9 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Bartesian. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 13#Bartesian until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:07, 13 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi UserTwoSix, since Dejardin (disambiguation) contained only one entry - its primary topic Dejardin - I have redirected Dejardin (disambiguation) to Dejardin. This is more inline with MOS:DAB. If you disagree, feel free to argue! Leschnei (talk) 12:33, 17 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Newton, Massachusetts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heartbreak Hill.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 24 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, [this edit summary] caught my eye. Good edit. Just wanted to say that "Libido death drive" would be an awesome name for a band. Keep up the good work, Laplorfill (talk) 21:45, 29 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please review Original research for what we can and cannot say (or synthesize) without a reliable source for the content. General Ization ^Talk 22:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Also, what is "286"? The number of residents of the portion that collapsed? Of the entire building? The number of residents plus staff and guests of residents that might have been on the site at 0124 on 7/24? Too vague to be useful. General Ization ^Talk 22:35, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please explain where the elements of {{sum|127|14}} come from. I'm not understanding that, and why it is not also synthesis. Even if we agree it should stay, it needs a hidden comment to explain this so others can maintain it. General Ization ^Talk 22:48, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

The latest figure was June 26, 127 accounted for, 159 missing. June 30, 145 missing. So 14 more accounted for. UserTwoSix (talk) 22:54, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

I reverted the statement. As I have been trying to explain, that is a classic case of synthesis, and is based on what is now outdated information. We do not know who is or how many are accounted for that have not yet been reported. In addition, the two refs you cited will not change, but the number of people "accounted for" certainly will, and we should not need to have to try to re-source that specific statement every time new data on missing and dead is released. All that does is increase the probability of our relating misinformation. General Ization ^Talk 22:58, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Redux

You don't seem to be understanding what I have mentioned to you previously about original research. Did you read that policy? Do you have questions? General Ization ^Talk 19:48, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

OK. I will read the policy and be more careful about adding things. UserTwoSix (talk) 19:59, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on The Last of the Muricans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:52, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Our new overlords. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 3#Our new overlords until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:29, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikinese. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 3#Wikinese until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:30, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Oabam. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 3#Oabam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 18:42, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Joey Diggs. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 4#Joey Diggs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:42, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Stinky crack. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 4#Stinky crack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:59, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Billy Cosby. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 4#Billy Cosby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:06, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Upper crack. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 4#Upper crack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:09, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Man cream. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 4#Man cream until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:13, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Will Cosby. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 4#Will Cosby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 07:52, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Crotch grab. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 4#Crotch grab until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 07:57, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Most of your redirect creations are fine, but the number requiring discussion at RfD is a sizable percentage of those you've created. A significant number of these RfDs are probably going to result in deletion. Could I encourage you to be a bit more cautious with the redirects you create? You might want to take a look at Wikipedia:Redirect/Deletion reasons for some insight into what makes a good redirect or a bad redirect. Or if you have specific questions of "Would this make a good redirect?", feel free to ask me anytime. Thanks. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 08:01, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Car food requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:52, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Too much water. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 4#Too much water until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:54, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Coffee shakes. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 5#Coffee shakes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:19, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 2021 building collapse. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 8#2021 building collapse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 09:19, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 2021 condo collapse. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 8#2021 condo collapse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 09:26, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Poncho Libre. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 8#Poncho Libre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 09:32, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect End this war. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 8#End this war until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 09:38, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Global warring is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global warring until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

-- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 09:45, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Free food. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 8#Free food until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:56, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Turkey and cheese. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 9#Turkey and cheese until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:39, 9 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Term with Dutch indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:03, 10 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Humanus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:57, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The End Is Near, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doomsday.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to Nostalgia does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! --Renat 18:41, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Croakies. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 12#Croakies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:19, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Country-style white bread. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 12#Country-style white bread until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:27, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect See food diet. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 12#See food diet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:33, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Bugby. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 13#Bugby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:37, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Chili Cheese. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 13#Chili Cheese until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Always the one. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 17#Always the one until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:46, 17 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Japan problem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japan problem until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra (talk) 21:16, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Little Sister, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Brothers Big Sisters.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ass man. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 21#Ass man until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:51, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Division 9. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 23#Division 9 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:48, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Hot dogs and hamburgers. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 27#Hot dogs and hamburgers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:59, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please stop creating redirects as most of them are being deleted and it's making extra work. ♟♙ (talk) 21:24, 9 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your edits to carbonara. It really isn't necessary to say ground pepper or grated cheese or cut-up pancetta -- we presume that our readers aren't idiots, and anyway, this is just the ingredients list. As for charcoal burner, it's enough to click on that link if you don't know what a charcoal burner is. Finally, our standards for categories say that we don't include redundant categories. Since the category Category:Spaghetti dishes is itself categorized as Category:Pasta dishes, we don't need to add it to the article. See WP:Categorization. --Macrakis (talk) 21:58, 9 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Macrakis: When I had carbonara, I thought it had something to do with coal miners. I saw that it was actually named for "charcoal burners" which to me sounds like charcoal chimney so I thought maybe someone else would be confused and it would help to say it is a person. I know about the supercategories, like Category:Pasta dishes, but since it isn't always made with spaghetti, what do we do then? I thought maybe it could be both a "pasta" dish and a "spaghetti" dish. UserTwoSix (talk) 22:28, 9 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Flannel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plaid.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 10 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Nashor's tooth. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 10#Nashor's tooth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:17, 10 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Eat your vegetables. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 14#Eat your vegetables until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:10, 14 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Rustic white. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 14#Rustic white until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect OdoBan. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 14#OdoBan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:23, 14 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trinity Alps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Granite Lake.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 17 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Testivan. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 17#Testivan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:46, 17 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The original picante sauce. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 22#The original picante sauce until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:49, 22 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Bloody rag. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 24#Bloody rag until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:30, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Both I and User:EnPassant have spoken to you about your redirect creations, but you've continued to create questionable redirects. There are 35 RfD notifications on this page. Of those 35, I count 25 deleted, 5 retargeted or disambiguated, 1 no consensus, 1 keep, 3 ongoing. You have also had several redirects speedily deleted. To be clear, these aren't normal numbers. If I had to guess I'd say that most editors have less than 1% of their redirects taken to RfD; and the rate of keep outcomes is defintely more than 1⁄35.

I don't want to make you feel bad. You create a lot of good redirects, don't get me wrong. But you're still making a lot that have issues. Of your 50 most recent, I spot at least 5 that I'll need to take to RfD, including Bloody vagina and Cat-sized. And since this has persisted after my and EnPassant's requests (although I do think EnPassant was a bit too curt), I'd like to formally request that, in the future, you only create redirects using WP:AFC/Redirects, at least for a little while till you get a better sense of what makes a good redirect.

I'm not an admin, so I can't force you to do this, but I hope you'll seriously consider it. Rosguill is one of our best redirect admins, and since they've RfD'd a number of your redirects I'm pinging them to see if they have any thoughts regarding this request. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 22:53, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

To avoid spamming you with pings, I disabled individual notifications, but please see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 24 for RfDs of AR^, Cat-sized, Afghan withdrawal, Climate accords, Osborne's band, Zappa's band, and Bloody vagina. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 23:21, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Tamzin, I agree with your concerns and your framing. UserTwoSix, while you've contributed several good redirects (and many more that I'm indifferent to but that aren't bad in the way that necessitates intervention), your signal to noise ratio leaves something to be desired. Unlike past editors that have ended up banned from creating redirects, you have created some helpful redirects, so I think that Tamzin's suggestion to use AFC/R is reasonable. The one last thing I'll note for transparency's sake is that even as an admin, I do not have the authority to unilaterally ban anyone from creating redirects. If this situation isn't resolved, however, I or another editor will bring this issue to WP:ANI where it would be subject to discussion, with a redirect ban on the table as a possible outcome. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:33, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

OK, @Tamzin: @Rosguill: I got the message. I also left comments on the RFD's that you mentioned.UserTwoSix (talk) 02:20, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for listening to what we had to say, UserTwoSix. See you at AFC/R. :) -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 02:14, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, UserTwoSix. I think there may have been a misunderstanding here. I had taken your above comment to mean that you were going to stop creating redirects except through WP:AFC/R. But I see that since your last comment here you've made a number of redirects, including one that I've RfD'd (although in fairness I don't think it was a particularly bad choice of target). Do you or do you not intend to restrict your creations to AFC/R? If not, I'm afraid that, if I see you create a problematic redirect again, I'll have to go to WP:ANI to request that the community formally restrict you to creating redirects through AFC/R. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 20:28, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Crap plant. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 25#Crap plant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. firefly ( t · c ) 08:13, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Clean butthole. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 25#Clean butthole until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. firefly ( t · c ) 08:26, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Infrastructure bill. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 25#Infrastructure bill until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 16:08, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Turd bucket. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 25#Turd bucket until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Talk 20:16, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Bad gas. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 28#Bad gas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:35, 28 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Hot chips. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 31#Hot chips until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 20:15, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Live your best. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 2#Live your best until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 13:18, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, UserTwoSix. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories.
Message added 12:34, 3 September 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Qwerfjkltalk

 

Hello, UserTwoSix. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories.
Message added 17:35, 4 September 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Qwerfjkltalk

An article you recently created, Charcoal lighting, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 06:21, 6 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, UserTwoSix. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories.
Message added 11:58, 6 September 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Qwerfjkltalk

Hi, I'd like to thank you for your contributions to that page. Overall they've improved the page, but I'd like to just remind you to adhere to fundamental principles on Wikipedia, mainly verifiability. Some of your contributions were also excessively technical, but if you make sure your contributions are backed up by (preferably) reliable secondary sources, I think you'll solve both issues. Cheers. 2600:1012:B061:AEE:E54E:E593:E178:5C81 (talk) 21:02, 6 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

I am requesting that you make fewer edits on the recall page by combining your changes into one. It is extremely difficult to review your changes, which are quite substantial. If your changes had no issues, I would not object to the manner in which you are editing, but your contributions have not been anywhere close to being consistently satisfactory. Please slow down. 2600:1012:B061:AEE:E54E:E593:E178:5C81 (talk) 23:13, 6 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Dark spider man. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 7#Dark spider man until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:30, 7 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Category:Terms with Dutch has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. 1857a (talk) 13:24, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, UserTwoSix

Thank you for creating Alusion.

User:TheSandDoctor, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good idea for a redirect!!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|TheSandDoctor}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheSandDoctor ^Talk 06:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, UserTwoSix. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories.
Message added 06:10, 21 September 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Qwerfjkltalk

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ISS year-long mission, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sergey Volkov.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 14:29, 8 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at COVID-19 vaccine, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 18:15, 8 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

The sources are already there. UserTwoSix (talk) 18:47, 8 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Maybe I missed something. Could you identify the source and give me a direct quotation that confirms "thrombosis events have been associated in mainly younger (<50 or <55 years of age) female patients"? Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 20:18, 8 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

I was looking for what "younger" meant, as to me it suggests a woman in her 20s or younger, maybe 30s. I looked at references 194, 195, and 197. 194 says "Most of the patients included in these reports were women younger than 50 years of age", 195 says "TTS mainly occurs in patients aged < 55 years and is associated with high morbidity and mortality." and 197 says "is recommending an immediate pause in the use of the AstraZeneca vaccine in all individuals less than 55 years of age in Canada. This is based on evidence of rare instances of vaccine-induced pro-thrombotic immune thrombocytopenia (VIPIT) following AstraZeneca". UserTwoSix (talk) 20:27, 8 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

OK, thanks. I didn't look carefully enough. Sundayclose (talk) 20:52, 8 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Caldo de ovos and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 26#Caldo de ovos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 22:27, 26 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Invasive brooms indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 17:11, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Invasive ivies indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 17:11, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, UserTwoSix. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Charcoal lighting, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Comparison between Esperanto and Ido, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digraph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 10 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

I noticed that you are removing the line {{Short description|none}} fromarticles with no short description. Per WP:SDNONE, articles without a short description should still use the template in order to add them to Category:Articles with short description. - ZLEA _T\^C 01:00, 26 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Russia vs. Ukraine and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 26#Russia vs. Ukraine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:45, 26 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Mama

added a link pointing to Papa

Papa

added a link pointing to Mama

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Love List requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 07:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please raise a move discussion for the page. The page is highly trafficked. Thanks! – robertsky (talk) 21:59, 16 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

I understand. Not sure though I want to make move discussion given pending merger. @Robertsky: UserTwoSix (talk) 22:02, 16 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

This merge discussion? I didn't notice earlier. Not where I would expect it to be, on the talk page of a redirect page rather than on one of the active pages. Let's wait for the merge discussion to close first then. If and when there is a consensus as to where the content of the various articles ends up to be, and the various redirect pages needs to be swapped out of the way, I will be happy to assist. – robertsky (talk) 22:14, 16 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ukraine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Borderland.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Category:Constructed languages with a Wikipedia has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:44, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Stinky baby and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 7#Stinky baby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:32, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I've speedy deleted it as pure trolling. Please don't create any more useless redirects. Bishonen | tålk 21:11, 7 May 2022 (UTC).Reply

I get it, @Bishonen. UserTwoSix (talk) 21:37, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Do you get it? You previously told me and Rosguill that you would only create redirects through WP:AFC/R, and then as far as I can tell immediately went back on that. (See § Formal request regarding redirects.) -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 21:45, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Singles Inferno and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 7#Singles Inferno until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:34, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bananus and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 7#Bananus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 21:50, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect American peasant and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 7#American peasant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 21:56, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Drip Drip Drop and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 7#Drip Drip Drop until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 22:00, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Reading the notifications on this page about redirects such as "Turd bucket", "Crap plant", "Clean butthole" etc etc, up to and including "Stinky baby", I'm amazed at the patience some admins have shown with your persistent creation of ridiculous redirects that waste the community's time. You have been blocked indefinitely. If I could block you merely from creating pages, I would, but there is no such option available to me. With luck, you may be able to persuade a reviewing admin to exchange the block for a voluntary undertaking to create no more redirects of any kind. I'm not sure I would recommend it, in view of your history of previous warnings and assurances that you "get it",[2] but I'll leave that to them. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 07:55, 8 May 2022 (UTC).Reply

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Japenglish and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 10#Japenglish until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 04:32, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, UserTwoSix

Thank you for creating Shashenk.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I know you were blocked for too many offbeat redirects but this one looks plausible

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:42, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Revolution of Dignity documentary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a valid dab page, although List of documentaries about the Revolution of Dignity could be, assuming there are a sufficient number of items (usually more than five)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. (t · c) buidhe 17:49, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Revolution of Dignity documentary has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:53, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bear children and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 11#Bear children until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 19:21, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Cold oatmeal and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 11#Cold oatmeal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 19:25, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect David's and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 11#David's until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 19:34, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect D und D and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 11#D und D until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 19:54, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bottomless and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 11#Bottomless until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 20:06, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The new Yellen and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 9#The new Yellen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TraderCharlotte (talk) 00:44, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The new Bernanke and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 9#The new Bernanke until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TraderCharlotte (talk) 00:48, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, UserTwoSix. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Charcoal lighting".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:56, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Cash grab has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, orphaned, and unnecessarily specific per WP:OC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr.weedle (talk) 05:42, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Cash grab, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:55, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Category:Winter heat waves has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 23:56, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect Wonder drug has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 26 § Wonder drug until a consensus is reached. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:14, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect Kick in the butt has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 4 § Kick in the butt until a consensus is reached. Styx (talk) 09:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect Real fruit juice has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 21 § Real fruit juice until a consensus is reached. cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 20:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply