Wikipietime

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Tyler (DNC spokesman) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Tyler (DNC spokesman) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:43, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Great, done with wikiP anyway Wikipietime (talk) 13:04, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Oh well Wikipietime (talk) 13:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Wikipietime. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "DoThink Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 17:15, 13 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Wikipietime. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jeff King".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 16:54, 16 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Concord Management and Consulting requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Comatmebro (talk) 20:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Wikipietime. I've reverted a number of your recent article talk page comments because they appear to violate WP:BLP. I see you've been given what I'd consider to be final warnings for similar problems, so I'd hope my concerns are obvious. Should we discuss this, or would it be better to get others involved? --Ronz (talk) 02:51, 24 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Wikipietime. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "DoThink Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 19:44, 13 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Wikipietime. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jeff King".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 09:46, 17 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mikhail Bystrov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikhail Bystrov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG ^talk 16:12, 15 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Citizens Against Gambling Expansion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NORG. Local organization with local coverage only

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rogermx (talk) 21:49, 5 December 2018 (UTC) don't much care anymore, about done with wikipedia and stifling editorsReply

 

Hello, Wikipietime. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "DoThink Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:35, 15 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Wikipietime. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bergen performing arts center".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 20:33, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Wikipietime. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Palisades Amusement and Exhibition Company".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 20:35, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Wikipietime. Why have you created a new account, User:Tinybirds? Is it for yourself to use? Please note that one person isn't supposed to have more than one account, unless they have some good reason for it and the different accounts are linked by a note about the connection. Bishonen | talk 13:37, 16 February 2020 (UTC).Reply

I have a good reason Wikipietime (talk) 15:30, 16 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please cite reference addressing “good reason” as you state “ Please note that one person isn't supposed to have more than one account, unless they have some good reason for it and the different accounts are linked by a note about the connection”

Wikipietime (talk) 15:37, 16 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Really? Please explain how you intend to use the extra account, and read the policy WP:SOCK for information. Bishonen | talk 20:32, 16 February 2020 (UTC).Reply

Please reply below within a reasonable timespan (say 24 hours from now — I can see you have edited from both accounts since I posted, and have already got them mixed up), or I will simply block your second account. Bishonen | talk 17:58, 17 February 2020 (UTC).Reply

Fine Wikipietime (talk) 18:35, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

It, the second account, accomplished what I needed. Thanks! Wikipietime (talk) 18:36, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

I'm thinking both accounts need blocking. Lard Almighty (talk) 19:55, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Well, we'll see. Wikipietime is a 13-years-old account, so I won't block it on a whim. But you have danced around our questions concerning Tinybirds long enough, Wikipietime. I don't know if by "it accomplished what I needed" you mean that its usefulness is now over ("accomplished"), or not, nor do I care. I have blocked it as a sockpuppet. Don't create any more accounts without explaining in detail, on both the extra accounts' userpages and Wikipietime's, what exactly they are for, and it better be something acceptable. Bishonen | talk 22:29, 17 February 2020 (UTC).Reply

Intimidating Wikipietime (talk) 02:04, 18 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Yes, that's the idea. This is a serious warning from an administrator, so please take it seriously. Bishonen | tålk 20:32, 24 February 2020 (UTC).

Please stop with the offensive tone and what feels to me as intimidating bullying. Wikipietime (talk) 21:01, 24 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

You done? Wikipietime (talk) 04:12, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Trying to add to his talk page; Rather high? Any comparisons that would be relevant? I recently was “nailed” in rather harsh terms for having unknowingly creating a second account, sock puppet. Not reading it violated policy if done fo no good reason. With the high rate of anom contributions on this article combined with masking of ip, makes one wonder. the integrity of this article and Wikipedia ads a whole. This article seems overly puffy pr. My recent dust up over sockpuppetry has me thinking the tone was overly harsh, interrogation like, when done without knowledge that it violated the policy. I am exploring the “good reason” criteria. What you say, bo and lard? Wikipietime (talk) 01:10, 20 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

You don't seem to know how to use talkpages, Wikipietime, even though you have been here for 13 years. Asking questions into empty air on your own page is meaningless. If you want particular people to see what you say, ask on their talkpages, or at least ping them here, using their actual account names. Ain't nobody here called "bo" or "lard". Bishonen | tålk 20:38, 24 February 2020 (UTC).Reply

noted Wikipietime (talk) 14:00, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Appreciate if you would stay off my talk page Wikipietime (talk) 00:07, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Is this not trolling? Wikipietime (talk) 00:08, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Anyone can watch a talk page and comment. Bishonen has made only helpful comments here, so it's definitely not trolling. Lard Almighty (talk) 08:39, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Bullied into oblivion for ?? By ?? Oh well wtf Wikipietime (talk) 17:38, 17 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Wikipietime. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Total Noise".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:43, 5 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ready to quit and stop funding Wikipietime (talk) 17:43, 17 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Railroaded to oblivion, make note of how attention was garnered by most recent edits and trolling, watchdog, editors.... as planned Wikipietime (talk) 02:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. — Newslinger talk 03:54, 10 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Just about done with contributions to Wikipedia, obvious what is going on. Wikipietime (talk) 02:50, 4 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Reeling from unrestrained editor deletions of my contributions…. Wikipietime (talk) 13:02, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Abandoning ship Wikipietime (talk) 04:13, 3 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quitting for good Wikipietime (talk) 16:05, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Mike Sarimsakci has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Minimally sourced BLP. I'm between WP:ANYBIO and WP:BLP1E here but it's had a notability tag since 2017 and I'm not sure there's much to say about this dude.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FalconK (talk) 06:35, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Should not be deleted Wikipietime (talk) 13:16, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/22/business/trump-organization-scion-hotel-deal.html Significant Wikipietime (talk) 13:22, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as Talk:Eupatorium capillifolium are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. Toddst1 (talk) 17:37, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:Wikipietime, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. I've removed several WP:POLEMIC sections from your talk page. Knock it off. WP:YANI. Toddst1 (talk) 18:23, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

threatening Wikipietime (talk) 12:44, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

you should not be editing my talk page Wikipietime (talk) 12:54, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott Hatch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Hatch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

jps (talk) 13:01, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

should stay Tinybirdie (talk) 03:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Ed Butowsky has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable financial advisor. No significant in-depth coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 5 April 2024 (UTC)Reply