Privybst

The scope of this category covers both the current adminitration and that of the Kingdom. Perhaps they should be split. But right now, they are not. So it is indeed also a "former" country. Laurel Lodged (talk) 07:40, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Laurel Lodged I have already created Category:Government of pre-partition Ireland. Do you agree with this solution? Privybst (talk) 08:11, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

I do not. Technically every government from the time of the Fianna to 1922 would fall into that category. Laurel Lodged (talk) 09:59, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Also, please stop creating new categories like Category:High Shrievalties in pre-partition Ireland. You seem to have a wide agenda. Would you care to discuss it? Laurel Lodged (talk) 10:02, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Laurel Lodged is it a problem that every government from the time of the Fianna to 1922 would falls into Category:Government of pre-partition Ireland? Now they all fall into Category:Government of Ireland. Let's discuss it, I'm open to any discussion on any venue. If you have any objection to the existance of Category:Pre-partition Ireland (or any of its sub-cats) can you open deleting/renaming/merging/splitting discussion? I don't know how to do it properly. Privybst (talk) 11:17, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Laurel Lodged 178.170.182.221 (talk) 19:27, 19 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article President of the Netherlands is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/President of the Netherlands until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 09:07, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article President of Denmark is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/President of Denmark until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 09:11, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article President of Belgium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Belgium has no president (never had), none of these are referred to as the president of Belgium.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:13, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, 2010 Swedish local elections, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:08, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2010 Swedish local elections and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

@DoubleGrazing But I put both sources from which all data is taken. Is it not enough? Privybst (talk) 11:13, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

When I declined this, there was one source cited once. No, that's not enough. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

@DoubleGrazing no, the main source with all data was from the very start. In Draft:2010 Swedish local elections#External links section. Privybst (talk) 11:24, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

External links are not references. Only sources which are cited (using any of the acceptable methods, but preferably through inline citations and footnotes) are considered references. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:26, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

@DoubleGrazing @MPGuy2824 see 1991 Swedish local elections, 2002 Swedish local elections, 2014 Swedish local elections, 2018 Swedish local elections, the same amount of information, the same amount of sources. Privybst (talk) 11:19, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

See otherstuffexists. In creating new articles, we must comply with the relevant guidelines and policies, not use other articles as the model. If there are existing articles with insufficient referencing, we need to deal with them, not create more such problems. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:25, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Privybst! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect President of the Netherlands and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 14#President of the Netherlands until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Dronebogus (talk) 01:07, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Have you ever edited using a different account, or using an IP? TylerBurden (talk) 21:41, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

I guess that's a yes. TylerBurden (talk) 21:55, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:49, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 06:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 25 § Category:Warehouses by country on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply