Paavamjinn

 

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Will be good to have it in mainspace once there are a couple of reviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sumesh and Ramesh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sumesh and Ramesh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 08:29, 21 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi Nomadicghumakkad, The article I created is about an Upcoming Malayalam cinema which is to be releasing soon. Can you please mention what more details I have to add in the article. I added the sources which are valuable in Wikipedia. If any more details to be added please mention here and take this a requestPaavamjinn (talk) 14:48, 21 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey Paavamjinn , thank you for your contributions. First of all, I must warn you of WP:COI. Please declare any conflict of interest you may have with this film. Beyond that, as per WP:NFILM, it should have two full length reviews. However, considering there is so much coverage, it also might just qualify WP:GNG. Out of all these sources, can you highlight WP:THREEE? Means present three best sources according to you. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 14:54, 21 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi Nomadicghumakkad, I don't have any personal interest on this film. My only objective is to improve Wikipedia articles. Basically I from Kerala. My intrested side is movies. So that I choose film section. Choosing difficult articles firstly is not easy. So I choose Films so that I can improve and later I can be part of some other articles. This film is an upcoming movie which is not released due to this pandemic. So that I am not able to provide that. Regarding latest news article, I am attaching four articles about the movie that come this year 1, 2, 3. Also I have a article from Techrader, which I have a doubt regarding it is a valuable source. The Link is 4. I added the article with maximum sources that I could find. Due to this pandemic the movie is in hold and no updates where came later January 2021.Paavamjinn (talk) 16:14, 21 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Paavamjinn. I will go through these tomorrow and respond. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you Nomadicghumakkad for your valuable comments and support

Hey Paavamjinn, The Two The Hindu sources are not indepth. The Sify is not reliable. Would you like to present any other sources? Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 11:49, 23 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi Nomadicghumakkad these all are latest Sources I got from Internet. If I need to mention more sources it will be at the time of announcement, i.e, in 2019 sources. Can I save this draft and at the time any updates come I will add those sources and will resubmit this article. Is that fine.Paavamjinn (talk) 14:29, 23 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey Paavamjinn, sure, that sounds good. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 10:08, 24 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Paavamjinn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sumesh and Ramesh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:12, 13 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Paavamjinn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sumesh and Ramesh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:49, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Mirnaa Menon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is the main space version of a draft that was declined six times (Draft:Mirnaa) before the page creator just created a main space version.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:21, 25 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Bheeshma Parvam. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:32, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

DaxServer The template says the content is long. As it is the plot of the movie how can we reduce the content. Many movies plot has more than this article. As the plot of the movies refers we giving what the movie story. So I thought I can remove the template and sorry for the mistake I done. I read the content I don't think that the content need to reduce, as it contains the important informations about the movie story. Please cross check it.Paavamjinn (talk) 10:50, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please read MOS:FILMPLOT - It outlines what can go into the plot sections. It restricts the plot to a maximum of 700 words. Nothing more than that. There is always a way to reduce the current plot. Other articles which have more plot like you said, also need to be trimmed. Hope it helps :) — DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:53, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

DaxServer So can I add maintenance templates to the articles that contains more than 700 words. I go throught many articles like that. Anyway I will try my Maximum to reduce the plot summary of Bheeshma Parvam Paavamjinn (talk) 19:04, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Yes, you can if you believe it would improve the project. Also, you must be prepared to answer any questions raised by others related to your edits.

• Wikipedia:Be bold

— DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:37, 9 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I am working on Mammootty's Hindi film Draft:Sau Jhooth Ek Sach, could you please add sources? DareshMohan (talk) 21:45, 16 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello DareshMohan I will try to find the sources will update. But I don't know how much time will it take and will do asap.Paavamjinn (talk) 23:26, 16 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi DareshMohan, I have added some sources and made changes to the article according to the sources I added. you can go through and edit if needed. You can resubmit for article submission again.Paavamjinn (talk) 18:31, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for contributing to the article Mammootty filmography. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 00:35, 21 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

kuru I have added the citations that are available in Internet. May I know which citation is in problem I provided. I have got all the sources by searching in Internet and I tried my level best in it.Paavamjinn (talk) 02:47, 21 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Could you please read through the links I gave you above? Specifically, the one on reliable sources. "Available on the internet" does not qualify something as an acceptable source. You can look at the article's history here, and from that see my two edits (here and here) which remove the same link you added. It's probably that one that is the problematic source. Kuru (talk) 12:10, 21 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

kuru I am sorry. I added DBpedia source because I was not able to find a source for the movie. Later I discussed with a user who is a good editor and makes some featured lists and articles and added the official website of the actor Mammootty itself. For the old movie back 1980s it will be very difficult to find reliable sources. I tried my level best to find the reliable sources. From now I wiol be very carefull in adding sources.Paavamjinn (talk) 14:36, 21 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

kuru Can I use actor Mammootty official website https://mammootty.com as source for Mammootty filmography. For movies in 1980s it is very difficult to find the sources.Paavamjinn (talk) 15:23, 22 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mammootty you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 01:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi Tayi Arajakate, thanks for considering the nomination. If any error or changes to be made in the please give me the comments and I will edit asap. Currently I added the sources for the areas where cn were required. Waiting for your comments.Paavamjinn (talk) 22:12, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

The article Mammootty you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mammootty for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 05:20, 14 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Paavamjinn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sumesh and Ramesh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:05, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

The article Cristiano Ronaldo you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:Cristiano Ronaldo/GA5 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. ––FormalDude talk 16:58, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

The article Mammootty you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:Mammootty for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 16:01, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Bazooka (2023 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. UtherSRG (talk) 00:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello Paavamjinn. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Paavamjinn. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Paavamjinn|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 12:32, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi 331dot, till now I haven’t add or edit any article for paying. I done the edits when I am free and I will get a proper research for the artice I am creating. I was busy with my future plans and I missed this. You can check my login timings and from now I will try to be active and I will create the articles as per your instructions for the safer side for all the parties involved in it. Thanks for your guidance.

  Hello, Paavamjinn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bazooka (2023 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Paavamjinn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bazooka".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:38, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Kerala Newsletter JULY 2024

Newly Nominated content Western Ghats     Open tasks You can add your suggestions for open tasks here Articles to be improved Malabar River Festival Edamalayar Edayattoor Erattayar Ezhuvathiruthy Gayathripuzha River High Range, Kerala Holy Land Chalakudy Irumbuzhi

WikiProject Kerala Main page talk Participants Newsletter talk  → Subscribe  → Contriute  → Archive Article alerts Popular pages Articles Delsort Todo tasks Cleanup Templates Sandbox User group   Miscellaneous We need more contributors for the newsletter. Feel free to add your ideas here We want to give the newsletter a unique name. Please add your suggestions here.   Events These are some of the events in Kerala in the month of July Malabar River Festival, 25-28 July, 2024 Muharram, 16 or 17 July, 2024

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Contribute
• Subscribe/Unsubscribe
• Archive

---

Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject Kerala. © Copyleft 2024.
Go here to unsubscribe if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:36, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply