Patronanejo

First, let me start with: I am not an admin; I cannot see the deleted article, other than the version you were able to provide, which doesn't show the edit history (or I would suggest attempting to get feedback from the article creator and any major contributor(s)). Second, I believe I looked at when it was at Wikipedia:Proposed deletion, but even if I had edited it, I would no longer be able to tell, as the deletion would also have deleted my linked contribution. Third, I look at a lot of Greek organization articles at Prod and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, but they tend to blur together; I look for them here. Fourth, I prefer editing the AfD discussion page, as, even if the article gets deleted, I'll be able to find my participation, but the article didn't get there. Fifth, even as your original may have looked tl;dr, as it involved deletion, and an admin, I felt you deserved a response, and it seemed to me to have gone unanswered longer than it should have, so I empathize with your second post, and I'll apologize for the length of this.

Having looked into this further, Wikipedia:Deletion review directs you to attempt to address it to the deleting admin, User:SarekOfVulcan (Talk), and I've found him to be helpful and reasonable in the past. Since the article was deleted by Prod and not an AfD discussion, you may request Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. There is also Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles, who are unlikely to have put themselves in the category by error, and the article was not the normal attack, copyright violation, hoax, or juvenile humor page admins frequently delete.

I have attempted without success to find additional sourcing to help you, but I will note the following: it is on the university page and therefore verified. Only minimal sourcing should be necesssary to justify a stub article. It is in search engine autosuggestions by the 9th character, and with Brown university by the 12th, but that indicates use, not notabilty. If you have access to membership rosters, the directory listing of names, even Wikipedia article entrants, would not be notable, but a biography which included sufficient university/fraternity coverage would be one reliable source. As an older institution, any coverage of it is likely not online, and university newspaper coverage also wouldn't help, but local coverage might; regardless, either might mention 'was featured/profiled by x magazine/newspaper'. Anything referenced will be verified.

This all seems like a lot of work, since you stated you are not a member; even if you don't act further on it hopefully someone will. If a request for userfication is approved, it would be placed in a sandbox or subpage for you; as long as continued improvement is made, this would be left alone for as much as a year or longer until deleted as a stale draft. Any future coverage may of course be included, but would need to be primarily about the fraternity, or provide sufficient coverage of it. A feature that was half about the fraternity and half about it's charity efforts this year might be sufficient; one of this year's seniors which only mentions it once and then profiles each would not be. Note that once verified by sufficient sourcing, uncontested information from the university, directory of notable members, and basic details like founding from its own sources would be includable. Dru of Id (talk) 22:10, 1 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Goidelic languages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Famine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 28 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

I wanted to briefly thank you for your thoughtful opinions regarding the RFC for the Murder of Kitty Genovese article. You were the first to offer more than just a superficial consideration to my concerns and you did so much more. Thanks. BashBrannigan (talk) 05:00, 19 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 61st Cavalry Regiment (United States), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army Reserve (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 12 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Environmental risks of the Keystone XL pipeline, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ambient, Insulated and Rutting (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 24 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Do I Ever Cross Your Mind (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Bodyguard

The Best of Chet Atkins & Friends (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Music for Pleasure

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 8 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pat Fry may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• January 2011 Ferrari announced that Fry had replaced Chris Dyer as head of race track engineering (while retaining his assistant technical director position [[Aldo Costa]].<ref>{{cite web | title =

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:42, 30 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of metonyms, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Waterloo and K Street (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:58, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Patronanejo. Some time ago you edited List of metonyms, adding a large number of items. Your source for all of these items was originally your own user name, and ultimately the Wikipedia article London. Wikipedia content is not considered a reliable source for further Wikipedia content. You need to cite some book, article, or other source that is independent of Wikipedia and presumed reliable. Furthermore, several of the metonyms you added (e.g. Calle Ocho, The Arab Street, The Brill Building) have nothing to do with London. I have removed all of the content you added. Please cite an independent source that explicitly discusses the item as a metonym if you re-add the content. Thanks, and happy editing. Cnilep (talk) 05:35, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Aegean Sea

• Sea of Crete
• Sea of Marmara

Adriatic Sea

Ionian Sea

Ligurian Sea

Tyrrhenian Sea

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Global OLED Technology LLC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Speakers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 1 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Elysium screencap detail.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

You recently made a correction to Singular they, effectively changing

• [use of] "he or she" to
• "the usage in cases of consistent antecedent-matching".

Your interpretation does not appear consistent with the author's intention and suggests that you misread the word "or" as being in roman typeface, which it was not.
In other words, you understood

he or she,

but the author wrote

he or she.

The sic that you also removed was intended to indicate where Baskervill apparently misquoted Byron. All the original sources I could find with Byron as the author, from 1822 on, give the wording

"Every one must judge according to their own feelings"

while various grammarians, published later and possibly copying from an original misquotation by Goold Brown in 1826, give the (apparently incorrect) wording

"Every one must judge of their own feelings".

--Boson (talk) 08:07, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marilyn Davenport, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Republican Party and Tea Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 5 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Danelectro Shorthorn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NOS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 8 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul Bettany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transcendence. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 2 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bugatti Veyron, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sedan, W18 and W16. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 7 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Looks like there is now a live article for it. Should User talk:Patronanejo/Zeta Delta Xi be deleted as a stale draft? DMacks (talk) 20:36, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Nihonjoe. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sea of Japan naming dispute have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I noticed that you reverted your own edit, but please do not make such disruptive edits in the future. Thank you. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 15:50, 6 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of British desserts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romantica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dewi Sukarno, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:03, 27 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please do not spam my talk page unless you know what you're talking about. The In popular culture section was already populated with examples that can only be documented by links to the examples themselves. I added a single example to the list, and was careful to do so to the same standard as the pre-existing list. If you have a problem with such sections perhaps you should have policed it properly instead of blaming it on the final unwitting editor. If you want references added, insert citation needed tags instead of deleting the section altogether. Thank you. Patronanejo (talk) 17:55, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for editing Repco. I am originally responsible for that part of the article. A part of your addition says "This meant that Buick heads would fit on Oldsmobile blocks, but not vice versa." but as the studs are fixed on the block and the heads have holes, I believe the Oldsmobile heads have extra holes. Isn't it a mistake that it should state "This meant that Oldsmobile heads would fit on Buick blocks, but not vice versa."? Yiba (talk | contribs) 00:57, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mnet vote manipulation investigation, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Alex (talk) 17:46, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

I was in the middle of doing that I had to switch to desktop view give me five minutes Patronanejo (talk) 17:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps using an edit summary would have been a wise move then. Something to take note of for future though, Soompi is not a reliable source, per WP:KO/RS. Please avoid using Soompi in the future and consider replacing the citations you have already used in the article. Alex (talk) 18:16, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Consider making use of the citation needed tag instead of wholesale reversion—things are already difficult enough in the mobile editor. Patronanejo (talk) 18:20, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply