Ponsonby100

 

The article Nicola Eimer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP with dubious notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kurepalaku (talk) 12:01, 28 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Kimberly Wyatt: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 20:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Mary Shelley: while I agree that "the couple and her sister" is not ideal, we try hard not to name our subjects by given name alone (unless as children). Any idea how to avoid that? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:34, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

It could read 'In 1816 the couple, accompanied by Claire Clairmont, famously.....' (we can't say Clairmont alone, since her mother is also referred to in the lead paragraphs) Sbishop (talk) 12:11, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Lady Louise Windsor, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. DrKay (talk) 06:57, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Greetings. FYI the word "church" is not capitalised in Wikipedia articles by itself even when it is referring to a specific church such as the Church of England. In WP articles this principle is exactly the same as it is for universities and other institutions, even if those institutions capitalise them in their own publications. There are a few exceptions but this is not one of them. Please see MOS:INSTITUTIONS for further information. It includes "church" in its examples of words which are not capitalised by themselves. Regards, Afterwriting (talk) 09:44, 14 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harry Hadden-Paton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Gill. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I'd like to explain somewhere the various symbols for cancellation marks. Where would be a good place, do you think? Not all are available in Unicode, so I've created SVGs for CTO cancel ( ), pen cancel ( ), etc. But I'm not sure what they all mean, exactly, as I've only found explanations in German. Please ping, — kwami (talk) 21:50, 11 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I did get reverted on one article by an editor that said ☉ does not mean postmark cancellation, per RS's, but just a used stamp. So far they haven't provided a source. — kwami (talk) 07:35, 12 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks again for the info re His Last Bow. I see the ref you mentioned in the Retirement section, but I have to say that without some knowledge of British history, it's not immediately apparent that it's the one. Here in the Colonies :) many of us don't know the exact dates of the reigns of Mdm. Victoria or Messr. Edward. BMJ-pdx (talk) 16:06, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I agree a note like the one now inserted should be fine Sbishop (talk) 16:21, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

Yesterday I made an edit that was reverted by this account. It is a convention in Wikipedia that those holders of titles (among them, Peers), shall have The Right Honourable as a prefix, their title in lieu of a name, and their Post-nominal letters in the Honorific Suffix field. Please refer to Valerie Amos, Baroness Amos, Margaret Thatcher, Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington, or Alexander Windsor, Earl of Ulster (who is not a peer but has his subsidiary title as a name), for further examples. Duke of Somewhere (talk) 07:36, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Having looked at the pages for his son, and the Earl of Leicester, I have reverted my changeSbishop (talk) 08:20, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

He was clearly a priest in the English church. He doesnt appear to have ever been a priest in Scotland. Rathfelder (talk) 17:05, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Thomas (antiquary), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Worcester.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 27 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Heya - you're right to revert my edit to Mary I; I just thought starting a section with "Meanwhile", with no given context of time, sounded a bit clunky. If you can come up with something 1am me couldn't that flows better, please do! Thanks --Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) ({{ping}} me!) 10:00, 30 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Neveselbert. I noticed that you recently removed content from Joseph Stalin without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 16:44, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello Sbishop. Placings in the WDC achieved with a car are and always have been considered directly relevant to the car's article, hence why we have always reported on drivers' titles achieved with a particular model. Drivers use a chassis to compete just as much as a constructor uses a chassis to compete, so both championships are equally distant from the car as each other. Please do not remove this information. 5225_C (talk • contributions) 07:03, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elsrickle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native Americans.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Janeite, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Opprobrium.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

You reverted my edit as "Expresses personal POV about film script - not encyclopedic ". Hardly POV to show that the film-maker opted to insert a historically untrue bit of love-interest fluff, while excluding a vital bitter-sweet element of the book whereby the deliverer of the fake documents was ultimately hanged for his anti-Nazi efforts. Of course it is encylopaedic! There are so many examples (such as "The Last King of Scotland") where a film-maker takes a good true story and emasculates it with unbelievable nonsense. Arrivisto (talk) 10:28, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

It would be fine to discuss the scriptwriter choices in a factual manner, including omissions and additions. But using terms such as 'superfluous' turns it into personal commentary. Someone else might believe the opposite - but neither POV should be in Wikipedia (unless it were to be a quote from a reliable critical source). Sbishop (talk) 10:59, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

OK, thanks! I will amend the text to be factual. The reliable source is the book itself! Arrivisto (talk) 18:23, 23 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Juliet Aubrey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Three Sisters.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Many thanks for correcting my silly error - was distracted at the time. Regards Denisarona (talk) 08:46, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

A pleasure. Thanks Sbishop (talk) 09:37, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Flora Montgomery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West End.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emily Woof, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

I can not understand why you reverted my edit (the whole edit actually).

What do you mean with "links don't work"?

And "licence not license", I think it's related with [[American and British English spelling differences

And the Irish flag link is related to Irish Tricolour, not to "Tricolour" alone. Meridiana solare (talk) 18:36, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

The user did this with my edit to Spencer film. He cited "British English" on edit summary which is no way an explanation for a not rather "minor" editing on the page. He literally deleted all the contents regarding the filming equipment used which is valid and comes with links for citation. AgencyX Deadpool (talk) 12:20, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

As an FYI on the revert on Julie Christie, it was part of a mass rollback from an IP hopping block evading editor causing a lot of disruption on actor's articles. Not all of their edits are disruptive, though most are. No issues with you reverting individual edits if it's valid and valuable. Canterbury Tail talk 13:37, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Length of movie. Vitaeterna (talk) 16:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

If you mean the 1935 film, my DVD is 89 minutes which is close enough to the 95 minutes stated at present. Sbishop (talk) 17:53, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Derek Newark, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West End.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. FF toho (talk) 18:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I should say that due to my pressing a button too early, the revert was published without the short explanation I intended to insert, which in brief was that the CIA and its 1950s publication cannot be regarded as a neutral and academic source for a view on whether Stalin was a dictator. This question is certainly open but other sources would be more appropriate to a change. Sbishop (talk) 07:37, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

This isn't stalking, just coincidence from [1]!--AntientNestor (talk) 11:42, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

I am giving a warning regarding the removal of the filming details for Spencer without citing the grounds for removal. The user cited the whole edit summary as "Article is in British English, see editing notes" which is in no way related to the deleted contents. This doesn't seem the first time you have done it with other articles WITHOUT adding the grounds to the edit summary. More of this and I'm raising this concern to the administrator's noticeboard. Refer to Disruptive user

AgencyX Deadpool (talk) 12:22, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited D. Denenge Duyst-Akpem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ICA.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 5 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi, you have made a series of edits to this article without providing anything in the way of edit comments. Such comments are good practice, as they indicate your intentions to other editors. Unconstructive edits are often uncommented, so leaving your edits without comments causes other editors to check everything you do wondering if you are being helpful or not, a waste of volunteer time. So, it would be much appreciated if you'd provide at least brief comments (as short as "rm overlinks" may be sufficient). All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:45, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello!

The reason I changed the short description on Quiche was because:

• Short descriptions should start with a capital letter
• Short descriptions generally don't need that much information in them, and should be concise.

However, disambiguating from pages such as Quiche Lorraine is important, so you are right, I'll leave the ingredients in. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 19:08, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

1) The link to WikiQuotes is on the ritgh-hand side of the page; you will find it there.

2) If you view the WP page ALL the way to the END, you will find a link to the WikiSource text of the novel, at https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Northanger_Abbey

3) Both quotes come from the 3rd paragraph of Chapter 1.

Cheers! Shir-El too 06:19, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Ignatius Taylor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maryborough.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fruitcake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Epiphany.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ilija Despot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Doctor Thorne (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rachel Shenton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Channel 5.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Bryant (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pygmalion.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi, greetings, etc. I see your talk page is plagued by notifications from a well-meaning but fuckwitted bot which is programmed to complain when you link to eg Pygmalion, since there are (strange as it may seem) multiple articles with this approximate title. That's what dab pages are for. The solution is unbelievably simple. Click Special:preferences → Gadgets → Appearance, and click/enable "Display links to disambiguation pages in orange". It does what it says on the tin. All you need to do (assuming you can read orange text) is to navigate to the specific article which you were intending to link to (out of the multitude of possibilities of which you you are now aware), copy the actual article title, and paste it between the time-honoured square brackets. Voilà!

Re: Nikolai Voznesensky - he was indeed dead: but karma works in many ways, and (if I may opine) you come across like some sort of Soviet-era commissar, as if N. Voznesensky's rehabilitation was (as if by magic) wholly unconnected with Beria's death. Смерть великолепна, блестящая, удивительно красивая. MinorProphet (talk) 23:13, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the information - which I have actioned. And thank you for the (unwitting?) compliment.Sbishop (talk) 07:11, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Happy to help. I actually was hoping to be mildly insulting, which obviously didn't work quite as I intended. Nevertheless, is there not a case for connecting the importunate B's untimely demise to the restoration of N's reputation, since B seems to have caused N's downfall in the first place? I made an immediate connection when I worked out the timeline, and I suspect other readers would also like to be informed: but of course correlation does not imply causation. There may be a case for continuing this discussion on the relevant talk page. Best wishes, MinorProphet (talk) 12:08, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

I shall be happy to reply to any talk page comment you make on the subject.Sbishop (talk) 12:50, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Full-course_dinner&oldid=prev&diff=1169785072

Reason for revert was "Not a reliable source". Sandler appears to be a reliable source. He is a historian and the author of more than 50 books. This factoid about Ziryab is also mentioned on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ziryab#Cuisine so I have no reason to doubt it. Do you think we can put this edit back? beefyt (talk) 16:30, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Okay, in view of your further information I think that would be alright. Thanks.Sbishop (talk) 07:48, 12 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I saw your edit summary reverting my edit on Agatha Christie's The Moving Finger. I have a copy of the book here—a recent US reprint—and it definitely says "an airplane accident." Do you have a copy of the book that says "motorcycle"? If so, perhaps this is a UK vs. US edition change, although I'm not sure why it would have been made. In any event, in another place in the article it still says "plane," so at least we ought to be consistent. Please let me know what you think. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 18:38, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

It may well be a US/UK thing. Yes, I do have a UK edition which refer to a motorcycle accident. Certainly there should eb consistency - in my view the easiest way to achieve this simply is to delete all reference to the cause of the accident. After all, it is not germane to the plot, it is simply a device to show why Jerry is in the village in the first place.Sbishop (talk) 08:03, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Sbishop. I notice that you reverted my see also link from Eton mess to Mess with the claim that there is no connection. You might want to take this up at the talk page for Mess, as the lead of that article states This sense of mess, which appeared in English in the 13th century, was often used for cooked or liquid dishes in particular, as in the "mess of pottage" (porridge or soup) or Eton mess. Shantavira|^{feed me} 07:34, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you - having looked at that I agree your edit was correct, probably no need to take to the Talk page.Sbishop (talk) 07:45, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

About this: Google Books doesn't display all works in every country. If the URL doesn't work for you, it can still work for other people. WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:08, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, there. Since I am fully making a page for the second Elizabethan era, I noticed that you reverted my edit on Mary of Teck - the one where I said that she was also known as the Lonesome Queen.

This was simply not vandalism, but a misunderstanding on your part. I read it on some random website that she had been called that, but now I can't find the source for it. It wasn't vandalism, just lack of clarity.

Happy editing :)

BillClinternet (talk) 20:20, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Okay, thanks for clarifying - though it shows the need for references for additions which are completely new in content if intent is not to be misunderstood.Sbishop (talk) 08:42, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

The latter was a mistake on my part.

BillClinternet (talk) 14:01, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I would like to inform about your statement under the title Turkey women's national volleyball team: Revision history. Turkey changed its official name as Türkiye. https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2022/06/28/turkey-is-now-turkiye-what-other-countries-have-changed-their-name Sincerely. Yavuzy (talk) 09:48, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

That isn't the point. The official name of Finland isn't Finland and the official name of Italy isn't Italy, but English Wikipedia refers to those countries by their names in English, just as French Wikipedia, for exampel, refers to the United Kingdom as Royaume Uni. Sbishop (talk) 10:08, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

The new version of this film is adapted using unconventional filming techniques such as breaking the fourth wall. If you have not seen the film then possibly you could restore the additions to the plot section which were started. If you are not familiar with films which use the fourth wall then I could list some for you. The changes should be restored for me to finish the plot section. HenryRoan (talk) 15:58, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I am very familiar with what 'fourth wall' means and how it is used in this film. Your additions need to separate out the plot from commentary on filming technique, which belongs elsewhere in the article, if necessary in a new section. And in the case of the latter, anything substantial needs to be sourced from reliable sources, not just be your personal commentary.Ponsonby100 (talk) 16:42, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for adjusting the caption to the image. The Purple Rose of Cairo is one well known film plot which uses fourth wall in the Wikipedia Plot section, among other films that do this. There are so many fourth wall asides made in this new version of Persuasion that it seems it will need to mention the fourth wall in the Plot section, no matter who writes it. See the plot section to The Purple Rose of Cairo as an example. If you have seen the 2022 film Persuasion then you can include it using your way of stating it. HenryRoan (talk) 18:22, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have read the summary section in The Purple Rose of Cairo article and it does mention the fourth wall issue - but does so by restricting itself to what the characters do, which I suppose is alright. If you wish to try something siimilar for the Persuasion article, there is nothing to stop you.Ponsonby100 (talk) 07:50, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

You noted that "pictures should not be linked like this in text"

How should they be linked? Thanks! :) Beth Timken (talk) 15:57, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Either the photo should appear alongside other photos in the article, as happens with some other people with blue plaques or, particularly if the article is already crowded, there should be a link in the 'see also section' at the foot of the article to the relevant English Heritage page at:

https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/blue-plaques/lawrence-alma-tadema/

Ponsonby100 (talk) 16:23, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I very much appreciate your recent edits clarifying the above article. I still find one thing unclear regrading who inherits Rutherford Hall: is it whoever is the eldest grandson at the time of Luther's father's death or at the time of Luther's death?

Many thanks Zin92 (talk) 12:34, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

The latter. One son has already died at the time the book has set. Ponsonby100 (talk) 14:08, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello Ponsonby. I noticed that you removed the explicit mention of Mike Wallace and reworded it to just "Several people" but looking at another actress page like Taraneh Alidoosti in which there are explicit mentions of people who reacted. Iam curious, isn't the sentence "About 600 members of the international arts community from 30 different countries signed an open letter demanding Alidoosti's release." be enough alone rather than mentioning everybody as everyone must have said something. 182.183.20.126 (talk) 11:07, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

The text on the Alidoosti page identifies a large number of well known people in the same profession as Alidoosti supporting her. It is unclear to me why an Irish politician with no connection to Barrera should be identified by name in this context, it appears quite random.Ponsonby100 (talk) 11:14, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

I see your point but, there is also a article like Mahsa Amini, in which there is mention of each celebrities's reactions. Whereas, the remarks of politicians and organizations may hold relevance but actors/actresses reaction one by one seems bit weird and extra since everyone around the world have said something about that. 182.183.53.207 (talk) 13:23, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Holiday wishes, user Ponsonby. Unregistered users can't thank other editors for their contributions with a simple click - I suppose a protection against misuse, vandalism, but a shame. Thank you for doing some valuable cleanup on the lead at The Lion in Winter article. 2601:196:180:DC0:6D5F:E3F9:2209:ADBA (talk) 19:36, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for doing the initial change. Best wishes. Ponsonby100 (talk) 19:43, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome. All the best in 2024.2601:196:180:DC0:6D5F:E3F9:2209:ADBA (talk) 21:37, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Persuasion (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cobb. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Ponsonby100. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Choir (1995 TV series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply