Sumitghosh14

Hello, Sumitghosh14, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Chengiz did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Introduction to referencing
• Help pages
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Ravensfire (talk) 00:51, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Chengiz, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 00:51, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chengiz, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Sacnilk is NOT a reliable source, please stop trying to use it on Chengiz. Ravensfire (talk) 00:53, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Raavan (2022 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 20:55, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Chengiz, you may be blocked from editing. You will end up blocked if you continue to make changes without including a reliable source. Sacnilk is NOT a reliable source. Ravensfire (talk) 03:39, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Chengiz. When the source given supports 15 as the budget, that's what the article should state. Any further edits from you that differ from the source or don't have a source and you will be reported and asked to be blocked. Wikipedia articles are based on what reliable sources say. Not what blogs, junk websites or editor preferences. Ravensfire (talk) 03:42, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Rajesh Ganguly has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.  // Timothy :: talk  09:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Rajesh Ganguly has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Hitro talk 10:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rajesh Ganguly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajesh Ganguly until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 // Timothy :: talk  10:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Avoid adding budget and gross collection of any film articles without references. Because content without references is removed from Wikipedia. খাঁ শুভেন্দু (talk) 11:10, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please don't use a source like mtwikiblog.com - it's a blog, which is not considered a reliable source for Wikipedia articles. Please read the reliable source page and self-published sources, which is what a blog is. Likewise, baapofmovies and sacnilk are also not considered good sources. WP:ICTFSOURCES can help you identify good sources. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 17:46, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please explain your contributions using a descriptive edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation, as you did at Boss 2: Back to Rule, may be confused with vandalism. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:31, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply