[go: up one dir, main page]

🏠 User page 💬 Talk 🖨️ Contribs 🧪 Sandbox 📂 Open Directory

Sebastian Hudak, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
Teahouse logo 

Hi Sebastian Hudak! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

edit
Teahouse logo 

Hi Sebastian Hudak! You created a thread called Editing Wikipedia with a VPN? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 25 June 2019 (UTC)Reply


Help me!

edit

Hello! I've found three articles that I'd like to nominate for deletion, but I'm unsure how. I'd like help on 1: what method of attempting deletion I should use for these articles, and 2: how I nominate them for deletion. Of course, if for whatever reason you disagree that any of these should be deleted, please let me know.

  1. Alison Whitney - This actress is not notable, and the current article is an extremely short stub with no citations.
  2. Nintendo Week - From the notability guidelines: "Generally, an individual radio or television program is likely to be notable if it airs on a network of radio or television stations (either national or regional in scope), or on a cable television channel with a broad regional or national audience. It is far less likely to be notable if it airs in only one local media market. In either case, however, the presence or absence of reliable sources is more definitive than the geographic range of the program's audience alone." This article currently is not formatted the way a Wikipedia should be, has almost no citations (and plenty of claims with no citations), and it seems like very few people actually care about modifying the article. This show also aired exclusively on the Nintendo Channel for the Wii.
  3. Red Ryder (software) - This article has zero references or citations. I made an attempt to do some research and try to find some references for the article, but I found nothing in my search, leading me to believe that this software isn't notable.

Big thanks for your help, I really appreciate it.

SebastianTalk | Contrib. - 06:49, 22 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

If it were me I might first attempt to nominate them as Proposed Deletions; if they are challenged, then you can go to Articles for Deletion. 331dot (talk) 07:55, 22 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! Just did that. Hopefully things go alright. SebastianTalk | Contrib. - 19:17, 22 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
Teahouse logo 

Hi Sebastian Hudak! You created a thread called Why is the visual editor disabled when editing certain pages like talk pages? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Sebastian Hudak

Thank you for creating Stylus (browser extension).

User:Elliot321, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Could use more information (broken down into sections), but good start for an article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Elliot321}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 17:38, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply